World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
51
Citations
9538
World Ranking
5381
National Ranking
2465

Ashok K. Goel publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ashok K. Goel sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 368 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ashok K. Goel D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ashok K. Goel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ashok K. Goel is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research chiefly falls within the field of Computer Science, with a particular emphasis on Artificial Intelligence. Their work extends into several subfields including Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Computer Networks and Communications, and Education.

The scientist's contributions focus notably on topics related to Online Learning and Analytics, Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning, Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods, AI in Service Interactions, Ethics and Social Impacts of AI, Topic Modeling, and Online and Blended Learning.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Ashok K. Goel include Spencer Rugaber, Sungeun An, Karan Taneja, Jennifer Hammock, and Sandeep Kakar. These collaborations have contributed to their research output, which is disseminated mainly through several key publication venues.

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • AI Magazine
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series
  • EDULEARN proceedings
  • Cureus

Some recent publications by Ashok K. Goel and related research include:

  • AI-Powered Learning: Making Education Accessible, Affordable, and Achievable, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Perspectives on design creativity and innovation research: 10 years later, 2022, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation
  • Understanding the Design Space of AI-Mediated Social Interaction in Online Learning: Challenges and Opportunities, 2022, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Co-Designing AI Agents to Support Social Connectedness Among Online Learners: Functionalities, Social Characteristics, and Ethical Challenges, 2022, Designing Interactive Systems Conference
  • Toward more effective and equitable learning: Identifying barriers and solutions for the future of online education, 2022, Technology Mind and Behavior

The scientist's research output encompasses a broad array of topics intersecting technology, education, and social dimensions of AI. Their work contributes to the understanding and development of AI-driven educational tools and methodologies, addressing challenges such as accessibility, equity, and social connectedness in online learning environments.

Best Publications

  • Biologically inspired design: process and products

    Michael Helms;Swaroop S. Vattam;Ashok K. Goel

  • Design, analogy, and creativity

    A.K. Goel

  • Structure, behavior, and function of complex systems: The structure, behavior, and function modeling language

    Ashok k. Goel;Spencer Rugaber;Swaroop Vattam

  • Functional representation as design rationale

    B. Chandrasekaran;A.K. Goel;Y. Iwasaki

  • Cognitive, collaborative, conceptual and creative - Four characteristics of the next generation of knowledge-based CAD systems: A study in biologically inspired design

    Ashok K. Goel;Swaroop Vattam;Bryan Wiltgen;Michael Helms

  • Case-based design support: a case study in architectural design

    M. Pearce;A.K. Goel;I.L. Kolodner;C. Zimring

  • DANE: Fostering Creativity in and through Biologically Inspired Design

    Swaroop Vattam;Bryan Wiltgen;Michael Helms;Ashok K. Goel

  • Functional representation of designs and redesign problem solving

    Ashok Goel;B. Chandrasekaran

  • Integration of case-based reasoning and model-based reasoning for adaptive design problem-solving

    B. Chandrasekaran;Ashok Kumar Goel

  • Understanding Complex Natural Systems by Articulating Structure-Behavior- Function Models

    Swaroop S. Vattam;Ashok K. Goel;Spencer Rugaber;Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver

  • Use of design patterns in analogy-based design

    Ashok K. Goel;Sambasiva R. Bhatta

  • Jill Watson: A Virtual Teaching Assistant for Online Education

    Ashok K. Goel;Lalith Polepeddi

  • Biologically Inspired Design

    Ashok K Goel;Daniel A McAdams;Robert B. Stone

  • Innovation in Analogical Design: A Model-Based Approach

    S. Bhatta;A. Goel;S. Prabhakar

  • A content account of creative analogies in biologically inspired design

    Swaroop s. Vattam;Michael e. Helms;Ashok k. Goel

  • Biologically-Inspired Innovation in Engineering Design: a Cognitive Study

    Swaroop Vattam;Michael E. Helms;Ashok K. Goel

  • Functional modeling for enabling adaptive design of devices for new environments

    Sattiraju V. Prabhakar;Ashok K. Goel

  • A computational model for solving problems from the Raven's Progressive Matrices intelligence test using iconic visual representations

    Maithilee Kunda;Keith Mcgreggor;Ashok K. Goel

  • Case-based design: A task analysis

    Ashok K. Goel;B. Chandrasekaran

  • Towards Mutual Theory of Mind in Human-AI Interaction: How Language Reflects What Students Perceive About a Virtual Teaching Assistant

    Qiaosi Wang;Koustuv Saha;Eric Gregori;David Joyner

  • Functional device models and model-Based diagnosis in adaptive design

    Ashok K. Goel;Eleni Stroulia

Frequent Co-Authors

Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver
Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver Indiana University
Eleni Stroulia
Eleni Stroulia University of Alberta
B. Chandrasekaran
B. Chandrasekaran Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Rebecca Jordan
Rebecca Jordan Michigan State University
Nancy J. Nersessian
Nancy J. Nersessian Harvard University
Andrea L. Thomaz
Andrea L. Thomaz The University of Texas at Austin
Shamkant B. Navathe
Shamkant B. Navathe Georgia Institute of Technology
John S. Gero
John S. Gero University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Janet L. Kolodner
Janet L. Kolodner Boston College
Marc J. Weissburg
Marc J. Weissburg Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens up diverse career opportunities—not just in pure computing but also in interconnected fields. Many students now explore a range of accelerated computer science degree options online, letting you enter the workforce faster or balance studies with personal commitments.

For those interested in broader problem-solving and real-world applications, degrees like the environmental engineering degree combine technical know-how with environmental stewardship—skills in high demand today.

Alternatively, pursuing an online degree in mechanical engineering is ideal for those fascinated by how things work and interested in developing innovative technologies. Professionals with this background are vital in fields from robotics to renewable energy.

If your interests lean towards the underlying principles shaping our digital world, the best online physics degree programs can provide a strong foundation. This pathway prepares you for careers in research, education, and advanced technical roles.

Best Scientists Citing Ashok K. Goel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles