World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 36 6386 5934 3076 2807 114 8535

Rebecca Jordan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rebecca Jordan between 1982 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rebecca Jordan published across 43 years, from 1982 to 2024, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2018. 6 of the 143 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2018. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 1 publication
1982 2024

143 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rebecca Jordan: publications per year, 1982 to 2024
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 1
2005 1
2006 4
2007 4
2008 8
2009 7
2010 9
2011 9
2012 10
2013 10
2014 7
2015 10
2016 7
2017 12
2018 15
2019 7
2020 6
2021 4
2022 4
2023 5
2024 1
Total 143
Download as CSV

Rebecca Jordan publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca Jordan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 114–123 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 114 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474 114
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Rebecca Jordan D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca Jordan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261 36
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Public Participation in Scientific Research: a Framework for Deliberate Design

    Jennifer L. Shirk;Heidi L. Ballard;Candie C. Wilderman;Tina Phillips

  • Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science Education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report.

    Rick Bonney;Heidi Ballard;Rebecca Jordan;Ellen McCallie

  • Knowledge Gain and Behavioral Change in Citizen‐Science Programs

    Rebecca C. Jordan;Steven A. Gray;David V. Howe;Wesley R. Brooks

  • Tools and methods in participatory modeling: Selecting the right tool for the job

    Alexey Voinov;Alexey Voinov;Karen Jenni;Steven Gray;Nagesh Kolagani

  • The impacts of an invasive species citizen science training program on participant attitudes, behavior, and science literacy.

    Alycia W. Crall;Rebecca Jordan;Kirstin Holfelder;Gregory J. Newman

  • Design and Reflection Help Students Develop Scientific Abilities: Learning in Introductory Physics Laboratories

    Eugenia Etkina;Anna Karelina;Maria Ruibal-Villasenor;David Rosengrant

  • Using fuzzy cognitive mapping as a participatory approach to analyze change, preferred states, and perceived resilience of social-ecological systems

    Steven A. Gray;Stefan Gray;Jean Luc De Kok;Ariella E. R. Helfgott

  • Key issues and new approaches for evaluating citizen‐science learning outcomes

    Rebecca C Jordan;Heidi L Ballard;Tina B Phillips

  • Modeling the integration of stakeholder knowledge in social–ecological decision-making: Benefits and limitations to knowledge diversity

    Steven Gray;Alex Chan;Dan Clark;Rebecca Jordan

  • Restarting the conversation: Challenges at the interface between ecology and society

    Peter M. Groffman;Cathlyn Stylinski;Matthew C. Nisbet;Carlos M. Duarte

  • Understanding Complex Natural Systems by Articulating Structure-Behavior- Function Models

    Swaroop S. Vattam;Ashok K. Goel;Spencer Rugaber;Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver

  • Bridging the nature gap: can citizen science reverse the extinction of experience?

    Stephanie G Schuttler;Amanda E Sorensen;Rebecca C Jordan;Caren Cooper;Caren Cooper

  • What should every citizen know about ecology

    Rebecca Jordan;Frederick Singer;John Vaughan;Alan Berkowitz

  • Citizen Science as a Distinct Field of Inquiry

    Unknown

  • Understanding collaborative learning processes in new learning environments

    Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver;Ellina Chernobilsky;Rebecca Jordan

  • Systems learning with a conceptual representation: a quasi-experimental study

    Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver;Rebecca Jordan;Catherine Eberbach;Suparna Sinha

  • Combining participatory modelling and citizen science to support volunteer conservation action

    Steven Gray;Rebecca Jordan;Alycia Crall;Greg Newman

  • Data quality in citizen science urban tree inventories

    Lara A. Roman;Bryant C. Scharenbroch;Bryant C. Scharenbroch;Johan P.A. Östberg;Lee S. Mueller

  • Purpose, processes, partnerships, and products: four Ps to advance participatory socio-environmental modeling

    Steven Gray;Alexey Voinov;Michael Paolisso;Rebecca Jordan

  • Using Representational Tools to Learn about Complex Systems: A Tale of Two Classrooms.

    Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver;Lei Liu;Steven Gray;Rebecca Jordan

  • Understanding Factors That Influence Stakeholder Trust of Natural Resource Science and Institutions

    Steven Gray;Rachael Shwom;Rebecca Jordan

  • Twelve Questions for the Participatory Modeling Community

    Rebecca Jordan;Steven Gray;Moira Zellner;Pierre D. Glynn

  • Evaluating the Performance of Volunteers in Mapping Invasive Plants in Public Conservation Lands

    Rebecca C. Jordan;Wesley R. Brooks;David V. Howe;Joan G. Ehrenfeld

  • Studying citizen science through adaptive management and learning feedbacks as mechanisms for improving conservation.

    Rebecca Jordan;Steven Gray;Amanda Sorensen;Greg Newman

Frequent Co-Authors

Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver
Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver Indiana University
Ashok K. Goel
Ashok K. Goel Georgia Institute of Technology
Klaus Hubacek
Klaus Hubacek University of Groningen
Shannon L. LaDeau
Shannon L. LaDeau Duke University
Francis Juanes
Francis Juanes University of Victoria
Alexey Voinov
Alexey Voinov University of Twente
Joan G. Ehrenfeld
Joan G. Ehrenfeld Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Jay R. Stauffer
Jay R. Stauffer Pennsylvania State University
Aaron M. McCright
Aaron M. McCright Michigan State University
Peter M. Groffman
Peter M. Groffman City University of New York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities opens the door to dynamic careers in fields like psychology, counseling, and social work. Many students now choose flexible online programs, making higher education more accessible and affordable.

For those interested in psychology, there are cheapest psychology degree online options that provide a solid foundation for entry-level jobs or graduate study without high tuition costs. If helping others through clinical social work appeals to you, consider 1 year msw programs online no bsw. These accelerated master's programs are designed for students looking for a fast path to licensure, even for those without a Bachelor of Social Work.

For advanced clinical practice or leadership roles, a doctorate may be required. There are now high-quality psyd online programs with flexible formats for working professionals. Similarly, becoming a licensed marriage and family therapist is more accessible than ever, thanks to lmft programs that can be completed online in less time.

Online pathways offer diverse entry points and timelines, making it easier than ever to launch or advance a career in the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Rebecca Jordan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles