World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Evanthia Galanis

Evanthia Galanis

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 83 15462 14546 7798 7215 364 30285

Evanthia Galanis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Evanthia Galanis between 1996 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Evanthia Galanis published across 31 years, from 1996 to 2026, averaging 14.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 51 publications in 2023. 30 of the 449 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 51. Peak 51 publications in 2023. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 6 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 51 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 28 publications 2026: 2 publications
1996 2026

449 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Evanthia Galanis: publications per year, 1996 to 2026
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 6
1998 10
1999 6
2000 8
2001 6
2002 5
2003 8
2004 8
2005 13
2006 16
2007 8
2008 13
2009 20
2010 15
2011 11
2012 20
2013 17
2014 14
2015 17
2016 16
2017 18
2018 16
2019 25
2020 19
2021 17
2022 16
2023 51
2024 19
2025 28
2026 2
Total 449
Download as CSV

Evanthia Galanis publications per year - data summary

  • Evanthia Galanis, a Medicine scholar from Mayo Clinic, has 449 publications recorded across 31 years, from 1996 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1996 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2023, with 51 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1996, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 14.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 14.5 per year counting only the 31 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 116 publications, 26% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1996-2006: 87 publications (7.9 per year); 2007-2017: 169 publications (15.4 per year); 2018-2026: 193 publications (21.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Evanthia Galanis publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Evanthia Galanis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 364 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838 364
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Evanthia Galanis publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Evanthia Galanis, a Medicine scholar from Mayo Clinic, records 364 publications - the 31st percentile of the discipline.
  • 31% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Evanthia Galanis, and about 69% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Evanthia Galanis ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Evanthia Galanis D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Evanthia Galanis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 83
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Evanthia Galanis D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Evanthia Galanis, a Medicine scholar from Mayo Clinic, records 83 D-Index - the 24th percentile of the discipline.
  • 24% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Evanthia Galanis, and about 76% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Evanthia Galanis ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Evanthia Galanis is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has a research focus primarily within the field of Medicine. Their work spans several interrelated subfields, including Genetics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's research topics prominently cover:

  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Brain Metastases and Treatment
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Meningioma and schwannoma management
  • Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • CAR-T cell therapy research

Among their recent publications are:

  • "Glioblastoma in adults: a Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Society of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions," 2020, Neuro-Oncology
  • "RANO 2.0: Update to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Criteria for High- and Low-Grade Gliomas in Adults," 2023, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • "Consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol for clinical trials in brain metastases," 2020, Neuro-Oncology
  • "Consensus recommendations for a dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI protocol for use in high-grade gliomas," 2020, Neuro-Oncology
  • "Glioblastoma Clinical Trials: Current Landscape and Opportunities for Improvement," 2021, Clinical Cancer Research

The scientist frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Neuro-Oncology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Neuro-Oncology Advances
  • Nature Medicine
  • JAMA Oncology

Collaborations have been established with several co-authors, including:

  • Patrick Y. Wen
  • Michael Weller
  • David A. Reardon
  • Priscilla K. Brastianos
  • Timothy J. Kaufmann

Best Publications

  • Updated Response Assessment Criteria for High-Grade Gliomas: Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group

    Patrick Y. Wen;David R. Macdonald;David A. Reardon;Timothy F. Cloughesy

  • Effect of Radiosurgery Alone vs Radiosurgery With Whole Brain Radiation Therapy on Cognitive Function in Patients With 1 to 3 Brain Metastases: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Paul D. Brown;Kurt Jaeckle;Karla V. Ballman;Elana Farace

  • Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery compared with whole brain radiotherapy for resected metastatic brain disease (NCCTG N107C/CEC·3): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

    Paul D. Brown;Paul D. Brown;Karla V. Ballman;Karla V. Ballman;Jane H. Cerhan;S. Keith Anderson

  • Phase II Trial of Temsirolimus (CCI-779) in Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme: A North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study

    Evanthia Galanis;Jan C. Buckner;Matthew J. Maurer;Jeffrey I. Kreisberg

  • Consensus recommendations for a standardized Brain Tumor Imaging Protocol in clinical trials

    Benjamin M. Ellingson;Martin Bendszus;Martin Bendszus;Jerrold Boxerman;Daniel Barboriak

  • Clinical trial results with oncolytic virotherapy: a century of promise, a decade of progress.

    Ta Chiang Liu;Evanthia Galanis;David Kirn

  • Is the blood-brain barrier really disrupted in all glioblastomas? A critical assessment of existing clinical data.

    Jann N Sarkaria;Leland S Hu;Ian F Parney;Deanna H Pafundi

  • Targeting angiogenesis: progress with anti-VEGF treatment with large molecules.

    Axel Grothey;Evanthia Galanis

  • Phase II Trial of Vorinostat in Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme: A North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study

    Evanthia Galanis;Kurt A. Jaeckle;Matthew J. Maurer;Joel M. Reid

  • Chapter 23 - Glioblastoma

    Hans-Georg Wirsching;Evanthia Galanis;Michael Weller

  • Patient tumor EGFR and PDGFRA gene amplifications retained in an invasive intracranial xenograft model of glioblastoma multiforme.

    Caterina Giannini;Jann N. Sarkaria;Atsushi Saito;Joon H. Uhm

  • Phase I Trial of Intraperitoneal Administration of an Oncolytic Measles Virus Strain Engineered to Express Carcinoembryonic Antigen for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

    Evanthia Galanis;Lynn C. Hartmann;William A. Cliby;Harry J. Long

  • Intra-arterial administration of a replication-selective adenovirus (dl1520) in patients with colorectal carcinoma metastatic to the liver: a phase I trial.

    T Reid;E Galanis;J Abbruzzese;D Sze

  • Use of a Vaccine Strain of Measles Virus Genetically Engineered to Produce Carcinoembryonic Antigen as a Novel Therapeutic Agent against Glioblastoma Multiforme

    Loi K. Phuong;Cory Allen;Kah Whye Peng;Caterina Giannini

  • Intraperitoneal Therapy of Ovarian Cancer Using an Engineered Measles Virus

    Kah Whye Peng;Cynthia J. TenEyck;Evanthia Galanis;Kimberly R. Kalli

  • Phase II trial of vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in recurrent glioblastoma: a north central cancer treatment group study.

    Bret B. Friday;S. Keith Anderson;Jan Buckner;Chunrong Yu

  • Mesenchymal Stem Cell Carriers Protect Oncolytic Measles Viruses from Antibody Neutralization in an Orthotopic Ovarian Cancer Therapy Model

    Emily K. Mader;Yoshihiro Maeyama;Yi Lin;Greg W. Butler

  • Clinical outcome of gliosarcoma compared with glioblastoma multiforme: North Central Cancer Treatment Group results

    Evanthia Galanis;Jan C. Buckner;Robert P. Dinapoli;Bernd W. Scheithauer

  • Identification of molecular characteristics correlated with glioblastoma sensitivity to EGFR kinase inhibition through use of an intracranial xenograft test panel

    Jann N. Sarkaria;Lin Yang;Patrick T. Grogan;Gaspar J. Kitange

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan C. Buckner
Jan C. Buckner Mayo Clinic
Patrick Y. Wen
Patrick Y. Wen Harvard University
Paul D. Brown
Paul D. Brown Mayo Clinic
Jann N. Sarkaria
Jann N. Sarkaria Mayo Clinic
David A. Reardon
David A. Reardon Harvard University
Karla V. Ballman
Karla V. Ballman Cornell University
Susan M. Chang
Susan M. Chang University of California, San Francisco
Martin J. van den Bent
Martin J. van den Bent Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative healthcare careers can be a smart move for those interested in Medicine but seeking different education pathways or quicker entry into the field. For instance, direct admit nursing programs offer a streamlined route for aspiring nurses by allowing students to enter nursing school immediately after high school without additional prerequisites.

If you prefer administrative roles, consider medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid. These programs prepare students for essential behind-the-scenes work and often provide flexible, affordable online options.

For those seeking a faster path into nursing, accredited lpn program no entrance exam options can help you start your healthcare journey without standardized testing barriers. This makes the process more accessible for many students.

Lastly, a degree in healthcare administration opens doors to leadership and management roles in clinics, hospitals, and other healthcare facilities. Accelerated online programs are available for those eager to advance their careers quickly.

Best Scientists Citing Evanthia Galanis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles