World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
55
Citations
15946
World Ranking
4227
National Ranking
54

B. Chandrasekaran publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where B. Chandrasekaran sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 216 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

B. Chandrasekaran D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where B. Chandrasekaran sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 1996 - ACM Fellow For contributions to knowledge-based systems research and applications, to statistical methods in pattern recognition, and to leadership in artificial intelligence.
  • 1986 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to statistical pattern recognition and artificial intelligence.

Overview

B. Chandrasekaran is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple areas within computer science and engineering, focusing extensively on topics related to blockchain technology, networking, and security.

Their recent publications include:

  • Understanding the Security Implications of Kubernetes Networking, 2021, IEEE Security & Privacy
  • Understanding Blockchain Governance: Analyzing Decentralized Voting to Amend DeFi Smart Contracts, 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Calibrating the performance and security of blockchains via information propagation delays, 2022, Proceedings of the 37th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing
  • Modeling Coordinated vs. P2P Mining: An Analysis of Inefficiency and Inequality in Proof-of-Work Blockchains, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Unlocking Diversity of Fast-Switched Optical Data Center Networks With Unified Routing, 2025, IEEE Transactions on Networking

Their frequent co-authors are:

  • Johnnatan Messias
  • Krishna P. Gummadi
  • Patrick Loiseau
  • Vabuk Pahari
  • Jialong Li

B. Chandrasekaran has contributed extensively to the following publication venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Security & Privacy
  • Proceedings of the 37th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing
  • IEEE Transactions on Networking

Their primary fields of study are:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering

Within these fields, their research covers several subfields, including:

  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Information Systems
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Management Science and Operations Research

The main topics addressed in their work comprise:

  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
  • Advanced Optical Network Technologies
  • Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • Optical Network Technologies
  • Advanced Photonic Communication Systems

B. Chandrasekaran has been recognized by professional societies with the following awards:

  • ACM Fellow (1996), for contributions to knowledge-based systems research and applications, to statistical methods in pattern recognition, and to leadership in artificial intelligence
  • IEEE Fellow (1986), for contributions to statistical pattern recognition and artificial intelligence

Best Publications

  • What are ontologies, and why do we need them?

    B. Chandrasekaran;J.R. Josephson;V.R. Benjamins

  • Generic Tasks in Knowledge-Based Reasoning: High-Level Building Blocks for Expert System Design

    B. Chandrasekaran

  • 39 Dimensionality and sample size considerations in pattern recognition practice

    Anil K. Jain;B. Chandrasekaran

  • The paradoxical success of fuzzy logic

    C. Elkan;H.R. Berenji;B. Chandrasekaran;C.J.S. de Silva

  • Generic tasks for knowledge-based reasoning: the “right” level of abstraction for knowledge acquisition

    T. Bylander;B. Chandrasekaran

  • Task-structure analysis for knowledge modeling

    B. Chandrasekaran;Todd R. Johnson;Jack W. Smith

  • What Are They? Why Do We Need Them?

    B. Chandrasekaran;J.R. Josephson;V.R. Benjamins

  • Diagrammatic Reasoning: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives

    Janice Glasgow;N. Hari Narayanan;B. Chandrasekaran

  • Function in Device Representation

    B. Chandrasekaran;John R. Josephson

  • Towards a Taxonomy of Problem Solving Types

    B. Chandrasekaran

  • Design Problem Solving: Knowledge Structures and Control Strategies

    David C. Brown;B. Chandrasekaran

  • Deep versus compiled knowledge approaches to diagnostic problem-solving

    B. Chandrasekaran;Sanjay Mittal

  • The Ontology of Tasks and Methods

    B. Chandrasekaran;J. R. Josephson

  • Functional representation as design rationale

    B. Chandrasekaran;A.K. Goel;Y. Iwasaki

  • Performance Comparison of MPI Implementations over InfiniBand, Myrinet and Quadrics

    Jiuxing Liu;Balasubramanian Chandrasekaran;Jiesheng Wu;Weihang Jiang

  • On dimensionality and sample size in statistical pattern classification

    Laveen N. Kanal;B. Chandrasekaran

  • Generic tasks and task structures: history, critique and new directions

    B. Chandrasekaran;Todd R. Johnson

  • Towards a functional architecture for intelligence based on generic information processing tasks

    B. Chandrasekaran

  • Functional representation of designs and redesign problem solving

    Ashok Goel;B. Chandrasekaran

  • A Mechanism for Forming Composite Explanatory Hypotheses

    John R. Josephson;B. Chandrasekaran;Jack W. Smith;Michael C. Tanner

Frequent Co-Authors

Ashok K. Goel
Ashok K. Goel Georgia Institute of Technology
Dhabaleswar K. Panda
Dhabaleswar K. Panda The Ohio State University
Richard Fikes
Richard Fikes Stanford University
Anil K. Jain
Anil K. Jain Michigan State University
Thomas G. Dietterich
Thomas G. Dietterich Oregon State University
Ronald R. Yager
Ronald R. Yager Iona University
George J. Klir
George J. Klir Binghamton University
Christian Freksa
Christian Freksa University of Bremen
Mo Jamshidi
Mo Jamshidi The University of Texas at San Antonio
Giorgio Rizzoni
Giorgio Rizzoni The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in Computer Science, exploring related online degrees and career paths can expand your opportunities. Many students pair their CS studies with specialized programs for a competitive edge. For example, online electrical engineering career outcomes are closely aligned with tech industry demand, allowing graduates to work in sectors like communications, robotics, and renewable energy.

Short on time? Some of the quickest masters degree online programs let you earn an accredited degree in as little as one year, fast-tracking your growth in high-demand tech fields. Alternatively, those seeking job-ready credentials can check out easy licenses and certifications to get, which boost your resume and quickly improve employability with minimal study time.

Finally, to maximize long-term value, it’s wise to pursue one of the most useful and valuable master's degrees in demand programs in the USA. These programs are tailored to current industry trends and increase your earning potential within just a few years. No matter your situation, online options make it easier than ever to advance your education and career in technology.

Best Scientists Citing B. Chandrasekaran

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles