World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
44
Citations
11372
World Ranking
6614
National Ranking
2359

Kyle C. Armour publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kyle C. Armour sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 118 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Kyle C. Armour D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kyle C. Armour sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - James B. Macelwane Medal, American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Overview

Kyle C. Armour is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a focus on several interrelated subfields and topics.

The main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Notable subfields in their work are:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Oceanography
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Plant Science

Their research covers key topics such as:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate

Kyle C. Armour has published multiple papers in prominent journals. Their recent work includes:

  • "An Assessment of Earth's Climate Sensitivity Using Multiple Lines of Evidence," 2020, Reviews of Geophysics
  • "Systematic Climate Model Biases in the Large-Scale Patterns of Recent Sea-Surface Temperature and Sea-Level Pressure Change," 2022, Geophysical Research Letters
  • "Intermodel Spread in the Pattern Effect and Its Contribution to Climate Sensitivity in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models," 2020, Journal of Climate
  • "Contributions to Polar Amplification in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models," 2021, Frontiers in Earth Science
  • "Pattern Recognition Methods to Separate Forced Responses from Internal Variability in Climate Model Ensembles and Observations," 2020, Journal of Climate

The frequent venues of publication include:

  • Journal of Climate
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Nature Climate Change
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Frequent co-authors in Kyle C. Armour's research consist of:

  • David S. Battisti
  • Aaron Donohoe
  • Cristian Proistosescu
  • Yue Dong
  • Gerard H. Roe

Kyle C. Armour received the James B. Macelwane Medal from the American Geophysical Union in 2020.

Best Publications

  • IPCC, 2023: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Unknown

  • An assessment of Earth's climate sensitivity using multiple lines of evidence

    S C Sherwood;M J Webb;J D Annan;K C Armour

  • Southern Ocean warming delayed by circumpolar upwelling and equatorward transport

    Kyle C. Armour;John Marshall;Jeffery R. Scott;Aaron Donohoe

  • Quantifying climate feedbacks in polar regions

    Hugues Goosse;Jennifer E. Kay;Kyle C. Armour;Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo

  • Time-Varying Climate Sensitivity from Regional Feedbacks

    Kyle C. Armour;Cecilia M. Bitz;Gerard H. Roe

  • Polar amplification dominated by local forcing and feedbacks

    Malte F. Stuecker;Cecilia M. Bitz;Kyle C. Armour;Cristian Proistosescu

  • Systematic Climate Model Biases in the Large‐Scale Patterns of Recent Sea‐Surface Temperature and Sea‐Level Pressure Change

    Unknown

  • Persistence and Inherent Predictability of Arctic Sea Ice in a GCM Ensemble and Observations

    Edward Blanchard-Wrigglesworth;Kyle C. Armour;Cecilia M. Bitz;Eric DeWeaver

  • Climate Sensitivity of the Community Climate System Model, Version 4

    Cecilia M. Bitz;K. M. Shell;P. R. Gent;D. A. Bailey

  • The dependence of transient climate sensitivity and radiative feedbacks on the spatial pattern of ocean heat uptake

    Brian E. J. Rose;Kyle C. Armour;David S. Battisti;Nicole Feldl

  • The ocean’s role in the transient response of climate to abrupt greenhouse gas forcing

    John Marshall;Jeffery R. Scott;Kyle C. Armour;J.-M. Campin

  • Conditions leading to the unprecedented low Antarctic sea ice extent during the 2016 austral spring season

    Malte F. Stuecker;Malte F. Stuecker;Cecilia M. Bitz;Kyle C. Armour

  • Accounting for Changing Temperature Patterns Increases Historical Estimates of Climate Sensitivity

    Timothy Andrews;Jonathan M. Gregory;Jonathan M. Gregory;David Paynter;Levi G. Silvers

  • Attributing Historical and Future Evolution of Radiative Feedbacks to Regional Warming Patterns using a Green’s Function Approach: The Preeminence of the Western Pacific

    Yue Dong;Cristian Proistosescu;Kyle C. Armour;David S. Battisti

  • The ocean's role in polar climate change: asymmetric Arctic and Antarctic responses to greenhouse gas and ozone forcing.

    John Marshall;Kyle C. Armour;Jeffery R. Scott;Yavor Kostov

  • Energy budget constraints on climate sensitivity in light of inconstant climate feedbacks

    Kyle C. Armour

  • Impact of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation on ocean heat storage and transient climate change

    Yavor Kostov;Kyle C. Armour;John Marshall

  • Contributions to Polar Amplification in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models

    Lily Caroline Hahn;Kyle C. Armour;Mark D Zelinka;Cecilia M. Bitz

  • Intermodel spread in the pattern effect and its contribution to climate sensitivity in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models

    Yue Dong;Kyle C. Armour;Mark D. Zelinka;Cristian Proistosescu

  • Pattern Recognition Methods to Separate Forced Responses from Internal Variability in Climate Model Ensembles and Observations

    Robert C. J. Wills;David S. Battisti;Kyle C. Armour;Tapio Schneider

  • Ocean–Atmosphere Dynamical Coupling Fundamental to the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation

    Robert C. J. Wills;Kyle C. Armour;David S. Battisti;Dennis L. Hartmann

  • The remote impacts of climate feedbacks on regional climate predictability

    Gerard H. Roe;Nicole Feldl;Kyle C. Armour;Yen-Ting Hwang

  • The reversibility of sea ice loss in a state-of-the-art climate model

    K. C. Armour;I. Eisenman;I. Eisenman;E. Blanchard-Wrigglesworth;K. E. McCusker

Frequent Co-Authors

David S. Battisti
David S. Battisti University of Washington
Cecilia M. Bitz
Cecilia M. Bitz University of Washington
Gerard H. Roe
Gerard H. Roe University of Washington
Malte F. Stuecker
Malte F. Stuecker University of Hawaii at Manoa
Mark D. Zelinka
Mark D. Zelinka Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
David Ferreira
David Ferreira University of Reading
Dargan M. W. Frierson
Dargan M. W. Frierson University of Washington
Piers M. Forster
Piers M. Forster University of Leeds

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career avenues. Many opt for programs that balance quality with affordability, such as some of the cheapest online general studies degree programs, which offer flexible study options while keeping costs low.

Choosing the right degree often means finding a program that matches your academic strengths. If you’re seeking manageable coursework, some of the easiest bachelor degree programs provide an accessible path to completing your education without sacrificing your passion for environmental issues.

Specialized fields like Geoscience and Geology are closely connected to Environmental Sciences. Enrolling in one of the online geoscience degree programs can deepen your understanding of earth systems, which is critical for addressing environmental challenges.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are increasingly valuable in environmental careers. Pursuing a geographic information systems degree equips you with tools to analyze spatial data, essential for resource management and conservation efforts.

Best Scientists Citing Kyle C. Armour

Trending Scientists