World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Timothy Andrews

Timothy Andrews

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
59
Citations
15881
World Ranking
3051
National Ranking
242

Timothy Andrews publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy Andrews sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 131 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Timothy Andrews D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy Andrews sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Timothy Andrews is affiliated with the Met Office in the United Kingdom and specializes in Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their research spans several subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Oceanography, Astronomy and Astrophysics, and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment.

Their work covers key scientific topics such as Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Climate variability and models, Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Atmospheric aerosols and clouds, and Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes.

Timothy Andrews has published multiple papers in prominent venues. Selected recent publications include:

  • "An Assessment of Earth's Climate Sensitivity Using Multiple Lines of Evidence" (2020), Reviews of Geophysics
  • "Effective radiative forcing and adjustments in CMIP6 models" (2020), Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "Implementation of U.K. Earth System Models for CMIP6" (2020), Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • "Historical Simulations With HadGEM3-GC3.1 for CMIP6" (2020), Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • "Intermodel Spread in the Pattern Effect and Its Contribution to Climate Sensitivity in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models" (2020), Journal of Climate

Common publication venues where Timothy Andrews frequently contributes include:

  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Frontiers in Climate

Collaborations are a notable aspect of their research with frequent co-authors being:

  • Piers Forster
  • Chris Smith
  • Gunnar Myhre
  • David Paynter
  • Kyle C. Armour

Best Publications

  • UKESM1: Description and Evaluation of the U.K. Earth System Model

    Alistair A. Sellar;Colin G. Jones;Jane P. Mulcahy;Yongming Tang

  • An assessment of Earth's climate sensitivity using multiple lines of evidence

    S C Sherwood;M J Webb;J D Annan;K C Armour

  • Aerosols implicated as a prime driver of twentieth-century North Atlantic climate variability

    Ben B. B. Booth;Nick J. Dunstone;Paul R. Halloran;Timothy Andrews

  • An update on Earth's energy balance in light of the latest global observations

    Graeme L. Stephens;Juilin Li;Martin Wild;Carol Anne Clayson

  • Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean climate models

    Timothy Andrews;Jonathan M. Gregory;Jonathan M. Gregory;Mark J. Webb;Karl E. Taylor

  • Evaluating adjusted forcing and model spread for historical and future scenarios in the CMIP5 generation of climate models

    Piers M. Forster;Timothy Andrews;Peter Good;Jonathan M. Gregory;Jonathan M. Gregory

  • The Dependence of Radiative Forcing and Feedback on Evolving Patterns of Surface Temperature Change in Climate Models

    Timothy Andrews;Jonathan M. Gregory;Mark J. Webb

  • Effective radiative forcing and adjustments in CMIP6 models

    Christopher J. Smith;Christopher J. Smith;Ryan J. Kramer;Ryan J. Kramer;Gunnar Myhre;Kari Alterskjær

  • Precipitation, radiative forcing and global temperature change

    Timothy Andrews;Piers M. Forster;Olivier Boucher;Nicolas Bellouin

  • The Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project (CFMIP) contribution to CMIP6.

    Mark J. Webb;Timothy Andrews;Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo;Sandrine Bony

  • Contributions of Different Cloud Types to Feedbacks and Rapid Adjustments in CMIP5

    Mark D. Zelinka;Stephen A. Klein;Karl E. Taylor;Timothy Andrews

  • Recommendations for diagnosing effective radiative forcing from climate models for CMIP6

    Piers M. Forster;Thomas Richardson;Amanda C. Maycock;Christopher J. Smith

  • Implementation of U.K. Earth system models for CMIP6

    Alistair A. Sellar;Jeremy Walton;Colin G. Jones;Richard Wood

  • Fast and slow precipitation responses to individual climate forcers: a PDRMIP multimodel study.

    B. H. Samset;G. Myhre;P. M. Forster;Ø. Hodnebrog

  • A Surface Energy Perspective on Climate Change

    Timothy Andrews;Piers M. Forster;Jonathan M. Gregory

  • Historical simulations with HadGEM3-GC3.1 for CMIP6

    Martin B. Andrews;Jeff K. Ridley;Richard A. Wood;Timothy Andrews

  • Improved aerosol processes and effective radiative forcing in HadGEM3 and UKESM1

    J. P. Mulcahy;C. Jones;A. Sellar;B. Johnson

  • Understanding Rapid Adjustments to Diverse Forcing Agents

    C. J. Smith;R. J. Kramer;G. Myhre;P. M. Forster

  • Accounting for Changing Temperature Patterns Increases Historical Estimates of Climate Sensitivity

    Timothy Andrews;Jonathan M. Gregory;Jonathan M. Gregory;David Paynter;Levi G. Silvers

  • Quantifying components of aerosol-cloud-radiation interactions in climate models

    Mark D. Zelinka;Timothy Andrews;Piers M. Forster;Karl E. Taylor

  • Volcanic radiative forcing from 1979 to 2015

    Anja Schmidt;Michael J. Mills;Steven Ghan;Jonathan M. Gregory

Frequent Co-Authors

Piers M. Forster
Piers M. Forster University of Leeds
Jonathan M. Gregory
Jonathan M. Gregory University of Reading
Gunnar Myhre
Gunnar Myhre Center for International Climate and Environmental Research
Gregory Faluvegi
Gregory Faluvegi Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Toshihiko Takemura
Toshihiko Takemura Kyushu University
Apostolos Voulgarakis
Apostolos Voulgarakis Imperial College London
Alf Kirkevåg
Alf Kirkevåg Norwegian Meteorological Institute
Olivier Boucher
Olivier Boucher Sorbonne University
Jean-Francois Lamarque
Jean-Francois Lamarque National Center for Atmospheric Research
Drew T. Shindell
Drew T. Shindell Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, numerous related online degree options are available. Students often explore an online bachelors in sociology to gain a deeper understanding of social dynamics that influence environmental policies and community engagement.

Educational professionals seeking to advance their careers might consider online edd programs no dissertation, which provide flexible opportunities without the lengthy dissertation commitment. These programs can enhance leadership skills crucial for environmental education initiatives.

For those aiming for the highest academic qualifications, accredited pathways such as accredited eds to edd programs offer an efficient route from a Doctor of Education to a Doctorate in Education, supporting careers in policy development and program administration.

Additionally, professionals looking to make a social impact through applied research or direct community work might explore online dsw programs, which focus on practical leadership roles within environmental and social contexts.

Best Scientists Citing Timothy Andrews

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles