World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 53 4821 4467 234 224 136 10448

Roel Verheul publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Roel Verheul between 1995 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Roel Verheul published across 30 years, from 1995 to 2024, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2011. 1 of the 141 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2011. 1995: 5 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1995 2024

141 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Roel Verheul: publications per year, 1995 to 2024
Year Publications
1995 5
1996 0
1997 0
1998 3
1999 2
2000 5
2001 5
2002 2
2003 4
2004 8
2005 11
2006 2
2007 9
2008 7
2009 12
2010 9
2011 16
2012 12
2013 3
2014 8
2015 4
2016 2
2017 3
2018 0
2019 3
2020 3
2021 0
2022 2
2023 0
2024 1
Total 141
Download as CSV

Roel Verheul publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roel Verheul sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 136 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 136
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Roel Verheul D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roel Verheul sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 53
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Roel Verheul is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research contributions primarily focus on clinical psychology, with a particular emphasis on personality disorders and psychopathology. The work also spans related fields such as philosophy, psychiatry, and mental health.

Verheul has explored various facets of psychotherapy techniques and applications, especially mentalization-based treatment for borderline personality disorder. Their research also touches on broader mental health issues including schizophrenia, suicide and self-harm, and child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development.

Frequent coauthors in their research include Maaike L. Smits, Patrick Luyten, Dine J. Feenstra, Dawn Bales, and Jan H. Kamphuis.

Their published papers include the following:

  • Trauma and Outcomes of Mentalization-Based Therapy for Individuals With Borderline Personality Disorder, 2022, American Journal of Psychotherapy
  • Day hospital versus intensive outpatient mentalization-based treatment: 3-year follow-up of patients treated for borderline personality disorder in a multicentre randomized clinical trial, 2020, Psychological Medicine
  • Impact of clinical severity on treatment response in a randomized controlled trial comparing day hospital and intensive outpatient mentalization-based treatment for borderline personality disorder, 2024, Personality and Mental Health
  • Economic evaluation of day hospital versus intensive outpatient mentalization-based treatment alongside a randomized controlled trial with 36-month follow-up., 2022, Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment
  • Day hospital versus intensive outpatient mentalization-based treatment: 3-year follow-up of patients treated for borderline personality disorder in a multicentre randomized clinical trial - ERRATUM, 2020, Psychological Medicine

Verheul's research is frequently published in several academic venues, with Psychological Medicine and American Journal of Psychotherapy among the main publication platforms. Other key venues include Personality and Mental Health and Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment.

The main fields of their scholarly work encompass:

  • Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities

Their research subfields specifically cover:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Philosophy
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Key topics frequently addressed in Verheul's studies include:

  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Best Publications

  • Dialectical behaviour therapy for women with borderline personality disorder: 12-month, randomised clinical trial in The Netherlands.

    Roel Verheul;Louise M. C. van den Bosch;Maarten W. J. Koeter;Maria A. J. de Ridder

  • A three-pathway psychobiological model of craving for alcohol.

    R Verheul;W van den Brink;P Geerlings

  • The economic burden of personality disorders in mental health care.

    Unknown

  • Proposed changes in personality and personality disorder assessment and diagnosis for DSM-5 Part I: Description and rationale.

    Andrew E. Skodol;Lee Anna Clark;Donna S. Bender;Robert F. Krueger

  • Dialectical Behavior Therapy of borderline patients with and without substance use problems. Implementation and long-term effects.

    Louisa M.C van den Bosch;Roel Verheul;Gerard M Schippers;Wim van den Brink

  • Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP-118): Development, Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity.

    Roel Verheul;Helene Andrea;Caspar C. Berghout;Conor Dolan

  • Reliability and validity of the borderline personality disorder severity index.

    Arnoud Arntz;Marije van den Hoorn;Jurgen Cornelis;Roel Verheul

  • Personality disorder types proposed for DSM-5.

    Andrew E. Skodol;Donna S. Bender;Leslie C. Morey;Lee Anna Clark

  • A meta-analysis of the prevalence and usage of the personality disorder not otherwise specified (PDNOS) diagnosis.

    Roel Verheul;Thomas A. Widiger

  • Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM-5, part II: empirical articulation of a core dimension of personality pathology

    Leslie C. Morey;Han Berghuis;Donna S. Bender;Roel Verheul

  • Sustained efficacy of dialectical behaviour therapy for borderline personality disorder

    Louisa M.C. van den Bosch;Maarten W.J. Koeter;Theo Stijnen;Roel Verheul

  • Personality disorder research agenda for the DSM-V

    Thomas A. Widiger;Erik Simonsen;Robert Krueger;W. John Livesley

  • The burden of disease in personality disorders: diagnosis-specific quality of life.

    Unknown

  • Prevalence of Personality Disorders among Alcoholics and Drug Addicts: An Overview

    Roel Verheul;Wim van den Brink;Christina Hartgers

  • Treatment outcome of 18-month, day hospital mentalization-based treatment (MBT) in patients with severe borderline personality disorder in the Netherlands.

    Unknown

  • Personality disorders predict relapse in alcoholic patients

    R. Verheul;W. Van Den Brink;C. Hartgers

  • Clinical utility of dimensional models for personality pathology.

    Unknown

  • Prevalence and Construct Validity of Personality Disorder not Otherwise Specified (PDNOS)

    Roel Verheul;Anna Bartak;Thomas Widiger

  • Prevalence rates of borderline personality disorder symptoms: a study based on the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2.

    Margreet ten Have;Roel Verheul;Ad Kaasenbrood;Saskia van Dorsselaer

  • Predictors of acamprosate efficacy: results from a pooled analysis of seven European trials including 1485 alcohol-dependent patients

    Roel Verheul;Philippe Lehert;Peter J. Geerlings;Maarten W. J. Koeter

  • Effectiveness of Day Hospital Mentalization-Based Treatment for Patients with Severe Borderline Personality Disorder: A Matched Control Study.

    Dawn Bales;Reinier Timman;Helene Andrea;Jan van Busschbach

  • Proposed changes in personality and personality disorder assessment and diagnosis for DSM-5 part II: clinical application

    Andrew E. Skodol;Donna S. Bender;John M. Oldham;Lee Anna Clark

  • Trauma, dissociation, and posttraumatic stress disorder in female borderline patients with and without substance abuse problems

    Louisa M. C. Van Den Bosch;Roel Verheul;Willie Langeland;Wim Van Den Brink

  • Effectiveness of different modalities of psychotherapeutic treatment for patients with cluster C personality disorders: results of a large prospective multicentre study.

    Anna Bartak;Marieke D. Spreeuwenberg;Helene Andrea;Lot Holleman

  • Predicting the effect of naltrexone and acamprosate in alcohol-dependent patients using genetic indicators.

    Wendy Ooteman;Mickaël Naassila;Maarten W. J. Koeter;Roel Verheul

  • Axis I and Axis II disorders in alcoholics and drug addicts: fact or artifact?

    R Verheul;H R Kranzler;J Poling;H Tennen

Frequent Co-Authors

Maarten W. J. Koeter
Maarten W. J. Koeter University of Amsterdam
Jan H. Kamphuis
Jan H. Kamphuis University of Amsterdam
Wim van den Brink
Wim van den Brink University of Amsterdam
Theo Stijnen
Theo Stijnen Leiden University Medical Center
Patrick Luyten
Patrick Luyten University College London
W. van den Brink
W. van den Brink University of Amsterdam
Paul M. G. Emmelkamp
Paul M. G. Emmelkamp University of Amsterdam
Jack Dekker
Jack Dekker Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Anna Kokkevi
Anna Kokkevi National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Per Vaglum
Per Vaglum University of Oslo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in psychology opens up multiple career pathways, especially in mental health counseling. Many prospective counselors are now choosing online degrees for flexibility and convenience. However, it's important to understand that each state and city has its own specific requirements for becoming a licensed counselor.

For instance, aspiring professionals can learn about North Las Vegas mental health counselor certification requirements, which outline the educational credentials and supervised experience needed locally. If you’re located in California, you’ll want to explore Oakland mental health counselor certification requirements to understand the specialized licensure process there.

Students considering a move or online study from other states should also review mental health counselor requirements in Oklahoma City and how to become a mental health counselor in Omaha. Each location has unique guidelines for clinical hours, exams, and certifications. Understanding these varying requirements is crucial when choosing a program or planning your career as a licensed mental health professional.

Best Scientists Citing Roel Verheul

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles