World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Paolo Maria Congedo

Paolo Maria Congedo

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 37 8484 8178 319 315 110 4503

Paolo Maria Congedo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paolo Maria Congedo between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paolo Maria Congedo published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2025. 25 of the 150 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2025. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 5 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 4 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 14 publications
2002 2025

150 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paolo Maria Congedo: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 0
2004 1
2005 1
2006 2
2007 1
2008 5
2009 2
2010 0
2011 2
2012 1
2013 4
2014 8
2015 13
2016 12
2017 13
2018 8
2019 4
2020 13
2021 10
2022 11
2023 13
2024 11
2025 14
Total 150
Download as CSV

Paolo Maria Congedo publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paolo Maria Congedo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 108–117 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 110 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369 110
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Paolo Maria Congedo D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paolo Maria Congedo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312 37
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Paolo Maria Congedo is affiliated with the University of Salento in Italy. Their research output spans multiple fields, with a particular concentration in engineering and environmental science. The scientist's work focuses notably on building energy and comfort optimization, wind and air flow studies, and renewable energy systems. Their scholarly contributions also extend to topics including energy and environment impacts, hybrid renewable energy systems, and urban heat island mitigation.

The main fields of study associated with Paolo Maria Congedo include:

  • Engineering
  • Environmental Science

The subfields in which they have published consist of:

  • Building and Construction
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Pollution

Key topics addressed in their research are:

  • Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Wind and Air Flow Studies
  • Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
  • Urban Heat Island Mitigation
  • Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
  • Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications

Paolo Maria Congedo's frequent publication venues include journals and platforms such as:

  • Energies
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
  • Energy and Buildings
  • Buildings

Collaborations have played a notable role in their research activities. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Cristina Baglivo
  • Domenico Mazzeo
  • Nicoletta Matera
  • Simone Panico
  • Giuseppe Oliveti

Among recent significant papers are:

  • "A literature review and statistical analysis of photovoltaic-wind hybrid renewable system research by considering the most relevant 550 articles: An upgradable matrix literature database" (2021), published in Journal of Cleaner Production
  • "A brief overview of solar and wind-based green hydrogen production systems: Trends and standardization" (2023), published in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
  • "Worldwide geographical mapping and optimization of stand-alone and grid-connected hybrid renewable system techno-economic performance across Köppen-Geiger climates" (2020), published in Applied Energy
  • "Complete greenhouse dynamic simulation tool to assess the crop thermal well-being and energy needs" (2020), published in Applied Thermal Engineering
  • "A review of recent studies and emerging trends in plasma-assisted combustion of ammonia as an effective hydrogen carrier" (2023), published in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Best Publications

  • CFD simulations of horizontal ground heat exchangers: A comparison among different configurations

    P.M. Congedo;G. Colangelo;G. Starace

  • Photovoltaic power forecasting using statistical methods: impact of weather data

    Maria Grazia De Giorgi;Paolo Maria Congedo;Maria Malvoni

  • Long term performance, losses and efficiency analysis of a 960 kWP photovoltaic system in the Mediterranean climate

    M. Malvoni;A. Leggieri;G. Maggiotto;P.M. Congedo

  • Performance measurements of monocrystalline silicon PV modules in South-eastern Italy

    P.M. Congedo;M. Malvoni;M. Mele;M.G. De Giorgi

  • Comparison Between Wind Power Prediction Models Based on Wavelet Decomposition with Least-Squares Support Vector Machine (LS-SVM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN)

    Maria Grazia De Giorgi;Stefano Campilongo;Antonio Ficarella;Paolo Maria Congedo

  • A literature review and statistical analysis of photovoltaic-wind hybrid renewable system research by considering the most relevant 550 articles: An upgradable matrix literature database

    Domenico Mazzeo;Nicoletta Matera;Pierangelo De Luca;Cristina Baglivo

  • Cost-optimal design for nearly zero energy office buildings located in warm climates

    Paolo Maria Congedo;Cristina Baglivo;Delia D'Agostino;Ilaria Zacà

  • Error analysis of hybrid photovoltaic power forecasting models: A case study of mediterranean climate

    Maria Grazia De Giorgi;Paolo Maria Congedo;Maria Malvoni;Domenico Laforgia

  • Comparison of strategies for multi-step ahead photovoltaic power forecasting models based on hybrid group method of data handling networks and least square support vector machine

    M.G. De Giorgi;M. Malvoni;P.M. Congedo

  • A brief overview of solar and wind-based green hydrogen production systems: Trends and standardization

    Unknown

  • CFD modeling and moisture dynamics implications of ventilation scenarios in historical buildings

    Delia D'Agostino;Paolo Maria Congedo

  • Worldwide geographical mapping and optimization of stand-alone and grid-connected hybrid renewable system techno-economic performance across Köppen-Geiger climates

    Domenico Mazzeo;Nicoletta Matera;Pierangelo De Luca;Cristina Baglivo

  • A novel energy-economic-environmental multi-criteria decision-making in the optimization of a hybrid renewable system

    Domenico Mazzeo;Cristina Baglivo;Nicoletta Matera;Paolo M. Congedo

  • Energy reliability-constrained method for the multi-objective optimization of a photovoltaic-wind hybrid system with battery storage

    Domenico Mazzeo;Giuseppe Oliveti;Cristina Baglivo;Paolo M. Congedo

  • Multi-objective optimization analysis for high efficiency external walls of zero energy buildings (ZEB) in the Mediterranean climate

    Cristina Baglivo;Paolo Maria Congedo;Andrea Fazio;Domenico Laforgia

  • Assessment of cost-optimality and technical solutions in high performance multi-residential buildings in the Mediterranean area

    Ilaria Zacà;Delia D’Agostino;Paolo Maria Congedo;Cristina Baglivo

  • Forecasting of PV Power Generation using weather input data‐preprocessing techniques

    Maria Malvoni;Maria Grazia De Giorgi;Paolo Maria Congedo

  • Complete greenhouse dynamic simulation tool to assess the crop thermal well-being and energy needs

    Cristina Baglivo;Domenico Mazzeo;Simone Panico;Sara Bonuso

  • Cost-optimal analysis and technical comparison between standard and high efficient mono-residential buildings in a warm climate

    Cristina Baglivo;Paolo Maria Congedo;Delia D'Agostino;Ilaria Zacà

  • Photovoltaic forecast based on hybrid PCA-LSSVM using dimensionality reducted data

    M. Malvoni;M.G. De Giorgi;P.M. Congedo

  • Interaction between Human Serum Albumin and Different Anatase TiO2 Nanoparticles: A Nano-bio Interface Study

    Viviana Vergaro;Claudia Carlucci;Mariafrancesca Cascione;Caterina Lorusso

  • Modeling And Analysis of Natural Convection Heat Transfer In Nanofluids

    Pietro Marco Congedo;Stefano Collura;Paolo Maria Congedo

Frequent Co-Authors

Domenico Mazzeo
Domenico Mazzeo Fondazione Politecnico di Milano
Domenico Laforgia
Domenico Laforgia University of Salento
Marco Beccali
Marco Beccali University of Palermo
Cinzia Giannini
Cinzia Giannini National Research Council (CNR)
Antonio Ficarella
Antonio Ficarella University of Salento
Riccardo Buccolieri
Riccardo Buccolieri University of Salento

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Engineering and Technology opens up a variety of related fields that can help broaden your skills and improve your career prospects. Many students opt to expand their expertise with flexible online degree programs that align with today’s industry needs.

For those interested in business leadership roles, consider the cheapest online mba no gmat options. An MBA can be a strong complement to an engineering background, helping you advance into management or entrepreneurial positions without the hassle of standardized testing requirements.

Project management is another high-demand skill set within technology. An online degree in project management can prepare you to lead engineering teams, oversee complex projects, and ensure objectives are met efficiently.

If you’re interested in fields outside traditional engineering, you might explore an online real estate bachelor's degree. This pathway is ideal for those considering property development or smart infrastructure careers.

Lastly, digital design is increasingly important in technology-driven industries. An online ux degree can help you develop user-centered digital products—an asset in both engineering and tech.

Best Scientists Citing Paolo Maria Congedo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles