World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
22825
World Ranking
8133
National Ranking
3482

Richard Fikes publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Fikes sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 102 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Richard Fikes D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Fikes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1990 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)

Overview

Richard Fikes is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research work predominantly falls within the field of Computer Science, with specific focus on the subfield of Artificial Intelligence.

The main research topics Richard Fikes has contributed to include:

  • AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies

Their recent publication record includes work such as:

  • Knowledge Representation and Reasoning - A History of DARPA Leadership (2020), published in AI Magazine

Richard Fikes has co-authored papers with researchers including Tom Garvey.

Their work has been published primarily in venues such as AI Magazine.

In recognition of contributions to the field, Richard Fikes was awarded the title of Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) in 1990.

Best Publications

  • STRIPS: a new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving

    Richard E. Fikes;Nils J. Nilsson

  • Enabling technology for knowledge sharing

    Robert Neches;Richard Fikes;Tim Finin;Tom Gruber

  • Learning and executing generalized robot plans

    Richard E. Fikes;Peter E. Hart;Nils J. Nilsson

  • The role of frame-based representation in reasoning

    Richard Fikes;Tom Kehler

  • PACT: an experiment in integrating concurrent engineering systems

    M.R. Cutkosky;R.S. Engelmore;R.E. Fikes;M.R. Genesereth

  • An environment for merging and testing large ontologies

    Deborah L. McGuinness;Richard Fikes;James Rice;Steve Wilder

  • OKBC: a programmatic foundation for knowledge base interoperability

    Vinay K. Chaudhri;Adam Farquhar;Richard Fikes;Peter D. Karp

  • The DARPA knowledge sharing effort: progress report

    Ramesh S. Patil;Richard E. Fikes;Peter F. Patel-Schneider;Don McKay

  • DAML+OIL: an ontology language for the Semantic Web

    D.L. Mcguinness;R. Fikes;J. Hendler;L.A. Stein

  • OWL-QL-a language for deductive query answering on the Semantic Web

    Richard Fikes;Patrick Hayes;Ian Horrocks

  • The Ontolingua Server

    Adam Farquhar;Richard Fikes;James Rice

  • The Chimaera Ontology Environment

    Deborah L. McGuinness;Richard Fikes;James Rice;Steve Wilder

  • Enterprise a Market-Like Task Scheduler for Distributed Computing Environments

    Thomas W. Malone;Richard E. Fikes;Michael T. Howard

  • A Reusable Ontology for Fluents in OWL

    Chris Welty;Richard Fikes

  • Swartout: Enabling technology for knowledge sharing

    Robert Neches;Richard Fikes;Tim Finin;Thomas R. Gruber

  • Collaborative Ontology Construction for Information Integration

    Adam Farquhar;Richard Fikes;Wanda Pratt;James Rice

  • A proof markup language for Semantic Web services

    Paulo Pinheiro da Silva;Deborah L. McGuinness;Richard Fikes

  • Contexts for the semantic web

    Ramanathan Guha;Rob McCool;Richard Fikes

  • REF-ARF: a system for solving problems stated as procedures

    Richard E. Fikes

  • Computing trust from revision history

    Honglei Zeng;Maher A. Alhossaini;Li Ding;Richard Fikes

  • IEEE Intelligent Systems: DAML+OIL: An Ontology Language for the Semantic Web.

    Deborah L. McGuinness;Richard Fikes;James A. Hendler;Lynn Andrea Stein

Frequent Co-Authors

Deborah L. McGuinness
Deborah L. McGuinness Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Nils J. Nilsson
Nils J. Nilsson Stanford University
Thomas R. Gruber
Thomas R. Gruber Austrian Institute of Technology
Wanda Pratt
Wanda Pratt University of Washington
Sheila A. McIlraith
Sheila A. McIlraith University of Toronto
Tim Finin
Tim Finin University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Ian Horrocks
Ian Horrocks University of Oxford
Alon Y. Levy
Alon Y. Levy Facebook (United States)
James A. Hendler
James A. Hendler Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
B. Chandrasekaran
B. Chandrasekaran Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Computer Science in the USA, there are plenty of flexible online options available. Many prospective students are drawn to cheap online college classes to reduce tuition costs while still accessing quality education. These affordable programs can help you start your Computer Science journey without a heavy financial burden.

Don’t let past academic challenges hold you back—there are reputable online schools that accept low gpa, providing opportunities for students with diverse educational backgrounds. This makes higher education more accessible, opening doors to various computer science careers.

For those hoping to accelerate their learning, some schools offer an accelerated computer science degree. These programs condense coursework into shorter timeframes, letting you enter the workforce sooner.

Beyond computer science, many students explore cross-disciplinary paths. For example, if you’re curious about the intersection of technology and the environment, you may want to know what can you do with an environmental science degree. Careers in this area leverage tech skills to solve real-world environmental challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Fikes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles