World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
53
Citations
11129
World Ranking
4830
National Ranking
2249

Wanda Pratt publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wanda Pratt sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 187 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Wanda Pratt D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wanda Pratt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wanda Pratt is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research spans psychology, medicine, and health professions, with a focus on subfields such as social psychology, general health professions, clinical psychology, sociology and political science, and reproductive medicine. The scientist's work addresses diverse topics, notably LGBTQ health, identity, and policy; sexuality, behavior, and technology; reproductive health and technologies; mobile health and mHealth applications; adolescent and pediatric healthcare; racial and ethnic identity research; and clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills.

Recent publications by Wanda Pratt include:

  • "Maybe they had a bad day: how LGBTQ and BIPOC patients react to bias in healthcare and struggle to speak out," 2022, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • "Association of Health Record Visualizations With Physicians' Cognitive Load When Prioritizing Hospitalized Patients," 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • "Self-Characterized Illness Phase and Information Needs of Participants in an Online Cancer Forum," 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "User-centered design of a longitudinal care plan for children with medical complexity," 2020, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • "Different roles with different goals: Designing to support shared situational awareness between patients and clinicians in the hospital," 2020, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Wanda Pratt frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • Journal of Adolescent Health
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Transgender Health
  • Telemedicine Journal and e-Health

Collaborations with other researchers are a notable aspect of Pratt's career. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Nicole F. Kahn
  • Dimitri Christakis
  • Gina M. Sequeira
  • Laura P. Richardson
  • Kacie M. Kidd

The scope of topics covered in Pratt's publications reflects a comprehensive approach to healthcare and social issues, including technology application and identity frameworks within clinical and public health settings. Their work intersects multiple disciplines, addressing both theoretical and practical problems in healthcare communication, patient experience, and health technology design.

Best Publications

  • Methodological Review: Healthcare in the pocket: Mapping the space of mobile-phone health interventions

    Predrag Klasnja;Wanda Pratt

  • Understanding quantified-selfers' practices in collecting and exploring personal data

    Eun Kyoung Choe;Nicole B. Lee;Bongshin Lee;Wanda Pratt

  • How to evaluate technologies for health behavior change in HCI research

    Predrag Klasnja;Sunny Consolvo;Wanda Pratt

  • Managing the Personal Side of Health: How Patient Expertise Differs from the Expertise of Clinicians

    Andrea Hartzler;Wanda Pratt

  • Personal health information management

    Wanda Pratt;Kenton Unruh;Andrea Civan;Meredith M. Skeels

  • Coordinating heterogeneous work: information and representation in medical care

    Madhu C. Reddy;Paul Dourish;Wanda Pratt

  • Incorporating ideas from computer-supported cooperative work

    Wanda Pratt;Madhu C. Reddy;David W. McDonald;Peter Tarczy-Hornoch

  • Collaborative Ontology Construction for Information Integration

    Adam Farquhar;Richard Fikes;Wanda Pratt;James Rice

  • Catalyzing social support for breast cancer patients

    Meredith M. Skeels;Kenton T. Unruh;Christopher Powell;Wanda Pratt

  • Temporality in Medical Work: Time also Matters

    Madhu C. Reddy;Paul Dourish;Wanda Pratt

  • SleepTight: low-burden, self-monitoring technology for capturing and reflecting on sleep behaviors

    Eun Kyoung Choe;Bongshin Lee;Matthew Kay;Wanda Pratt

  • Patients as actors: The patient's role in detecting, preventing, and recovering from medical errors

    Kenton T. Unruh;Wanda Pratt

  • Using statistical and knowledge-based approaches for literature-based discovery

    Meliha Yetisgen-Yildiz;Wanda Pratt

  • A knowledge-based approach to organizing retrieved documents

    Wanda Pratt;Marti A. Hearst;Lawrence M. Fagan

  • Transparent Queries: investigation users' mental models of search engines

    Jack Muramatsu;Wanda Pratt

  • LitLinker: capturing connections across the biomedical literature

    Wanda Pratt;Meliha Yetisgen-Yildiz

  • Effective Intervention or Child's Play? A Review of Video Games for Diabetes Education

    Jonathan DeShazo;Lynne Harris;Wanda Pratt

  • Using mobile & personal sensing technologies to support health behavior change in everyday life: lessons learned.

    Predrag V. Klasnja;Sunny Consolvo;David W. McDonald;James A. Landay

  • Sociotechnical requirements analysis for clinical systems.

    Madhu Reddy;W. Pratt;P. Dourish;M. M. Shabot

  • Health Vlogs as Social Support for Chronic Illness Management

    Jina Huh;Leslie S. Liu;Tina Neogi;Kori Inkpen

  • Personal health information management

    Andrea Civan;Meredith M. Skeels;Anna Stolyar;Wanda Pratt

Frequent Co-Authors

David W. McDonald
David W. McDonald University of Washington
Predrag Klasnja
Predrag Klasnja University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jacob O. Wobbrock
Jacob O. Wobbrock University of Washington
Sean A. Munson
Sean A. Munson University of Washington
Julie A. Kientz
Julie A. Kientz University of Washington
Paul Dourish
Paul Dourish University of California, Irvine
Eun Kyoung Choe
Eun Kyoung Choe University of Maryland, College Park
Kori Inkpen
Kori Inkpen Microsoft (United States)
Richard Fikes
Richard Fikes Stanford University
Mary Czerwinski
Mary Czerwinski Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Computer Science can open up versatile career options and help you specialize in fields that match your interests. For those looking to progress rapidly, an accelerated cs degree offers a pathway to graduate sooner and potentially lower educational costs, allowing you to enter the workforce quickly.

Computer Science graduates often find their skills are highly transferable to engineering and science disciplines. If you're passionate about sustainability, pursuing an environmental science degree may be a great fit, opening doors to careers that address global environmental challenges.

For those interested in the intersection of technology and the environment, an environmental engineering degree can equip you with the technical skills to design solutions for real-world issues. Similarly, considering a career in engineering by researching the mechanical engineering cost of education can help you find affordable options in this high-demand field.

Overall, choosing an online degree provides flexibility and a wide array of pathways to suit your goals in technology, engineering, or environmental science.

Best Scientists Citing Wanda Pratt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles