World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
66
Citations
18581
World Ranking
2979
National Ranking
77

Philippe Maeder publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philippe Maeder sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 317 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Philippe Maeder D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philippe Maeder sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philippe Maeder is affiliated with the University of Lausanne in Switzerland. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Ophthalmology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics including:

  • Ocular Oncology and Treatments
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Brain Metastases and Treatment
  • Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Philippe Maeder has published extensively in multiple academic journals. The most frequent venues for their publications include:

  • European Radiology
  • Cancers
  • American Journal of Neuroradiology
  • Neurological Sciences
  • Frontiers in Pediatrics

Notable recent papers authored by or involving Philippe Maeder include:

  • MR Imaging Features to Differentiate Retinoblastoma from Coats' Disease and Persistent Fetal Vasculature, 2020, Cancers
  • Fetal Brain Biometric Measurements on 3D Super-Resolution Reconstructed T2-Weighted MRI: An Intra- and Inter-observer Agreement Study, 2021, Frontiers in Pediatrics
  • Improved susceptibility-weighted imaging for high contrast and resolution thalamic nuclei mapping at 7T, 2020, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
  • Biologically effective dose correlates with linear tumor volume changes after upfront single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas, 2021, Neurosurgical Review
  • MRI software for diffusion-perfusion mismatch analysis may impact on patients' selection and clinical outcome, 2021, European Radiology

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers in their field. Key co-authors with multiple joint publications include:

  • Annette C. Moll
  • Christiaan M. de Bloeme
  • Paolo Galluzzi
  • Pim de Graaf
  • Robin W. Jansen

Best Publications

  • Understanding Diffusion MR Imaging Techniques: From Scalar Diffusion-weighted Imaging to Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Beyond

    Patric Hagmann;Lisa Jonasson;Philippe Maeder;Jean-Philippe Thiran

  • European Stroke Initiative Recommendations for Stroke Management-update 2003.

    Gunnel E. Carlsson;Anders Möller;Christian Blomstrand;Takashi Ueda

  • Prognostic accuracy of cerebral blood flow measurement by perfusion computed tomography, at the time of emergency room admission, in acute stroke patients.

    Max Wintermark;Marc Reichhart;Jean-Philippe Thiran;Philippe Maeder

  • Mapping the human connectome at multiple scales with diffusion spectrum MRI.

    Leila Cammoun;Xavier Gigandet;Djalel Eddine Meskaldji;Jean-Philippe Thiran

  • Distinct pathways involved in sound recognition and localization: A human fMRI study

    Philippe P. Maeder;Reto A. Meuli;Michela Adriani;Anne Bellmann;Anne Bellmann

  • Simultaneous measurement of regional cerebral blood flow by perfusion CT and stable xenon CT: a validation study.

    Max Wintermark;Jean-Philippe Thiran;Philippe Maeder;Pierre Schnyder

  • DTI mapping of human brain connectivity: statistical fibre tracking and virtual dissection.

    Patric Hagmann;Jean-Philippe Thiran;Lisa Jonasson;Pierre Vandergheynst

  • Spinal cord ischemia: clinical and imaging patterns, pathogenesis, and outcomes in 27 patients.

    Jan Novy;Alain Carruzzo;Philippe Maeder;Julien Bogousslavsky

  • Long-Term Effects of Cannabis on Brain Structure

    Giovanni Battistella;Eleonora Fornari;Jean-Marie Annoni;Haithem Chtioui

  • Strokes restricted to the insular cortex

    C. Cereda;J. Ghika;P. Maeder;J. Bogousslavsky

  • Quantitative Assessment of Regional Cerebral Blood Flows by Perfusion CT Studies at Low Injection Rates: A Critical Review of the Underlying Theoretical Models

    M. Wintermark;P. Maeder;J.-P. Thiran;P. Schnyder

  • Using 80 kVp versus 120 kVp in perfusion CT measurement of regional cerebral blood flow.

    Max Wintermark;Philippe Maeder;Francis R. Verdun;Jean-Philippe Thiran

  • Multisensory Interactions within Human Primary Cortices Revealed by BOLD Dynamics

    Roberto Martuzzi;Roberto Martuzzi;Micah M. Murray;Christoph M. Michel;Jean-Philippe Thiran

  • The Acute STroke Registry and Analysis of Lausanne (ASTRAL): Design and Baseline Analysis of an Ischemic Stroke Registry Including Acute Multimodal Imaging

    Patrik Michel;Céline Odier;Matthieu Rutgers;Marc Reichhart

  • The etiology of posterior circulation infarcts A prospective study using magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance angiography

    J. Bogousslavsky;F. Regli;P. Maeder;R. Meuli

  • Multislice computerized tomography angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: a comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.

    Max Wintermark;Antoine Uske;Marc Chalaron;Luca Regli

  • An evaluation of volume-based morphometry for prediction of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease

    Daniel Schmitter;Alexis Roche;Bénédicte Maréchal;Delphine Ribes

  • Measuring brain perfusion with intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM): initial clinical experience

    Christian Federau;Kieran O'Brien;Reto Meuli;Patric Hagmann

  • Pituitary blastoma: a pathognomonic feature of germ-line DICER1 mutations.

    Leanne de Kock;Leanne de Kock;Nelly Sabbaghian;François Plourde;Archana Srivastava

  • Guidelines for imaging retinoblastoma: imaging principles and MRI standardization

    Pim de Graaf;Sophia Göricke;Firazia Rodjan;Paolo Galluzzi

  • What and where in human audition: selective deficits following focal hemispheric lesions.

    Stephanie Clarke;Anne Bellmann Thiran;Philippe Maeder;Michela Adriani

Frequent Co-Authors

Reto Meuli
Reto Meuli University of Lausanne
Jean-Philippe Thiran
Jean-Philippe Thiran École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Stephanie Clarke
Stephanie Clarke University Hospital of Lausanne
Julien Bogousslavsky
Julien Bogousslavsky University Hospital of Lausanne
Patrik Michel
Patrik Michel University of Lausanne
Patric Hagmann
Patric Hagmann University of Lausanne
Francis L. Munier
Francis L. Munier University of Lausanne
Jean-Marie Annoni
Jean-Marie Annoni University of Fribourg
Max Wintermark
Max Wintermark Stanford University
Maria G. Knyazeva
Maria G. Knyazeva University of Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience doesn’t have to follow a traditional path—many related fields offer flexible online options for advancing your career. For those seeking quick entry into the workforce or professional upskilling, consider pursuing job certifications online that align with mental health, psychology, or data science.

If you’re a working professional or returning learner, there are many online classes for adults, including foundational science courses and interdisciplinary degrees, to help you build relevant skills at your own pace.

Those interested in the intersection of neuroscience and social impact can find the cheapest online master's in social work programs, which open doors to clinical, counseling, or policy-related roles.

Additionally, specialized credentials such as a bcba degree online (Board Certified Behavior Analyst) are increasingly popular for students focused on behavioral neuroscience and therapy.

With these flexible and affordable online pathways, students can pursue meaningful neuroscience-related careers while balancing other life commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Philippe Maeder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles