World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Frederick C. Meinzer

Frederick C. Meinzer

Award Badge
Plant Science and Agronomy
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 119 73 70 23 21 309 37167

Frederick C. Meinzer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Frederick C. Meinzer between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Frederick C. Meinzer published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 7.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 1994. 5 of the 315 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 1994. 1982: 3 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 10 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 20 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1982 2025

315 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Frederick C. Meinzer: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 3
1983 2
1984 2
1985 6
1986 4
1987 0
1988 5
1989 2
1990 10
1991 4
1992 7
1993 4
1994 20
1995 8
1996 5
1997 7
1998 5
1999 7
2000 9
2001 7
2002 7
2003 7
2004 13
2005 9
2006 7
2007 9
2008 17
2009 9
2010 8
2011 14
2012 8
2013 9
2014 9
2015 7
2016 11
2017 14
2018 4
2019 12
2020 7
2021 3
2022 8
2023 1
2024 3
2025 2
Total 315
Download as CSV

Frederick C. Meinzer publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick C. Meinzer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 306–310 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 309 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30 309
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Frederick C. Meinzer D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick C. Meinzer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 109+ D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 119 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99 119
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in United States Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in United States Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Ecology
  • Ecosystem

His scientific interests lie mostly in Botany, Transpiration, Xylem, Hydraulic conductivity and Stomatal conductance. In general Botany, his work in Canopy is often linked to Water transport linking many areas of study. His Transpiration study incorporates themes from Anacardium excelsum, Humidity, Water potential and Crown.

His work deals with themes such as Allometry, Water use, Soil water, Cavitation and Tree species, which intersect with Xylem. His studies in Hydraulic conductivity integrate themes in fields like Tropical climate, Poaceae, Saccharum and Woody plant. His work on Turgor pressure as part of his general Horticulture study is frequently connected to Water source, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.

His most cited work include:

  • A review of whole-plant water use studies in tree. (486 citations)
  • Carbon dynamics in trees: feast or famine? (462 citations)
  • Stem water storage and diurnal patterns of water use in tropical forest canopy trees (390 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Frederick C. Meinzer mainly investigates Botany, Transpiration, Horticulture, Xylem and Stomatal conductance. His research integrates issues of Hydraulic conductivity and Agronomy in his study of Botany. His Transpiration research includes themes of Water use, Ecology, Evergreen, Atmospheric sciences and Humidity.

Frederick C. Meinzer has included themes like Hydraulic conductance, Metrosideros polymorpha and Sucrose in his Horticulture study. His research investigates the connection between Xylem and topics such as Osmotic pressure that intersect with problems in Apoplast. His studies deal with areas such as Cultivar, Vapour Pressure Deficit, Water-use efficiency, Water balance and Crown as well as Stomatal conductance.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (58.16%)
  • Transpiration (31.21%)
  • Horticulture (28.72%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2021)?

  • Botany (58.16%)
  • Ecology (21.28%)
  • Stomatal conductance (27.30%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Frederick C. Meinzer spends much of his time researching Botany, Ecology, Stomatal conductance, Agronomy and Xylem. Frederick C. Meinzer combines topics linked to Horticulture with his work on Botany. His work carried out in the field of Ecology brings together such families of science as Atmospheric sciences and Transpiration.

His work on Hydraulic redistribution and Canopy conductance as part of general Transpiration study is frequently linked to Water transport, bridging the gap between disciplines. The Stomatal conductance study combines topics in areas such as Photosynthetic capacity, Woody plant, Water-use efficiency and Seedling. Frederick C. Meinzer interconnects Hydraulic conductivity, Soil science, Temperate forest and Drought tolerance in the investigation of issues within Xylem.

Between 2013 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • The dynamic pipeline: hydraulic capacitance and xylem hydraulic safety in four tall conifer species. (98 citations)
  • Mapping 'hydroscapes' along the iso- to anisohydric continuum of stomatal regulation of plant water status (97 citations)
  • Dynamics of leaf water relations components in co‐occurring iso‐ and anisohydric conifer species (87 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Ecosystem

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Ecology, Botany, Stomatal conductance, Climate change and Water transport. His work on Ecosystem and Water use as part of general Ecology research is often related to Isotopes of oxygen, thus linking different fields of science. His Water use study which covers Drought tolerance that intersects with Xylem.

Stomatal conductance is the subject of his research, which falls under Photosynthesis. His study looks at the intersection of Climate change and topics like Biome with Transpiration and Water cycle. His Water transport investigation overlaps with other disciplines such as Hydraulic conductivity and Hydraulics.

Best Publications

  • Carbon dynamics in trees: feast or famine?

    Anna Sala;David R. Woodruff;Frederick C. Meinzer

  • A review of whole-plant water use studies in tree.

    Stan D. Wullschleger;F. C. Meinzer;R. A. Vertessy

  • Xylem hydraulic safety margins in woody plants: coordination of stomatal control of xylem tension with hydraulic capacitance

    Frederick C. Meinzer;Daniel M. Johnson;Barbara Lachenbruch;Katherine A. McCulloh

  • Stem water storage and diurnal patterns of water use in tropical forest canopy trees

    G. Goldstein;J. L. Andrade;F. C. Meinzer;N. M. Holbrook

  • Leaf photosynthetic traits scale with hydraulic conductivity and wood density in Panamanian forest canopy trees

    Louis S. Santiago;Louis S. Santiago;Guillermo Goldstein;Frederick C. Meinzer;Jack B. Fisher

  • Potential errors in measurement of nonuniform sap flow using heat dissipation probes

    Michael J. Clearwater;Frederick C. Meinzer;José Luis Andrade;Guillermo Goldstein

  • Safety and efficiency conflicts in hydraulic architecture: scaling from tissues to trees

    John S. Sperry;Frederick C. Meinzer;Katherine A. McCULLOH

  • Biodiversity meets the atmosphere: A global view of forest canopies

    C. M. P. Ozanne;D. Anhuf;Sarah Boulter;M. Keller

  • Functional convergence in plant responses to the environment

    Frederick C Meinzer

  • Stomatal and hydraulic conductance in growing sugarcane: stomatal adjustment to water transport capacity*

    F. C. Meinzer;D. A. Grantz

  • The relationship between tree height and leaf area: sapwood area ratio.

    N. Mcdowell;H. Barnard;B. J. Bond;T. Hinckley

  • Functional convergence in hydraulic architecture and water relations of tropical savanna trees: from leaf to whole plant.

    S J Bucci;G Goldstein;Frederick C Meinzer;F G Scholz

  • Water transport in trees: current perspectives, new insights and some controversies

    Frederick C. Meinzer;Michael J. Clearwater;Guillermo Goldstein

  • Partitioning of soil water among canopy trees in a seasonally dry tropical forest

    Frederick C. Meinzer;José Luis Andrade;Guillermo Goldstein;N. Michele Holbrook

  • Does turgor limit growth in tall trees

    D. R. Woodruff;B. J. Bond;F. C. Meinzer

  • Hydraulic redistribution of soil water during summer drought in two contrasting Pacific Northwest coniferous forests

    J. Renée Brooks;Frederick C. Meinzer;Rob Coulombe;Jillian Gregg

  • Dynamic changes in hydraulic conductivity in petioles of two savanna tree species: factors and mechanisms contributing to the refilling of embolized vessels

    S. J. Bucci;F. G. Scholz;G. Goldstein;G. Goldstein;F. C. Meinzer

  • Leaf functional traits of Neotropical savanna trees in relation to seasonal water deficit

    A. C. Franco;M. Bustamante;L. S. Caldas;G. Goldstein

  • Biophysical properties and functional significance of stem water storage tissues in Neotropical savanna trees.

    Fabian G. Scholz;Sandra J. Bucci;Sandra J. Bucci;Guillermo Goldstein;Guillermo Goldstein;Frederick C. Meinzer

  • Co-ordination of vapour and liquid phase water transport properties in plants

    Frederick C. Meinzer

  • Partitioning of soil water among tree species in a Brazilian Cerrado ecosystem.

    Paula C. Jackson;Frederick C. Meinzer;Mercedes Bustamante;Guillermo Goldstein

  • Size- and age-related changes in tree structure and function

    Frederick C. Meinzer;Barbara Lachenbruch;Todd E. Dawson

Frequent Co-Authors

Guillermo Goldstein
Guillermo Goldstein University of Miami
David R. Woodruff
David R. Woodruff US Forest Service
Katherine A. McCulloh
Katherine A. McCulloh University of Wisconsin–Madison
Barbara Lachenbruch
Barbara Lachenbruch Oregon State University
Jean-Christophe Domec
Jean-Christophe Domec Bordeaux Sciences Agro
Augusto C. Franco
Augusto C. Franco University of Brasília
Sandra J. Bucci
Sandra J. Bucci National Scientific and Technical Research Council
Philip W. Rundel
Philip W. Rundel University of California, Los Angeles
Daniel M. Johnson
Daniel M. Johnson University of Georgia
Jeffrey M. Warren
Jeffrey M. Warren Oak Ridge National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Frederick C. Meinzer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles