World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
31
Citations
5143
World Ranking
6106
National Ranking
1474

Barbara Lachenbruch publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara Lachenbruch sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 58 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Barbara Lachenbruch D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara Lachenbruch sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Xylem hydraulic safety margins in woody plants: coordination of stomatal control of xylem tension with hydraulic capacitance

    Frederick C. Meinzer;Daniel M. Johnson;Barbara Lachenbruch;Katherine A. McCulloh

  • Size- and age-related changes in tree structure and function

    Frederick C. Meinzer;Barbara Lachenbruch;Todd E. Dawson

  • Antisense Down-Regulation of 4CL Expression Alters Lignification, Tree Growth, and Saccharification Potential of Field-Grown Poplar

    Steven L. Voelker;Barbara Lachenbruch;Frederick C. Meinzer;Michael Jourdes

  • Maximum height in a conifer is associated with conflicting requirements for xylem design

    Jean-Christophe Domec;Barbara Lachenbruch;Frederick C. Meinzer;David R. Woodruff

  • Radial Variation in Wood Structure and Function in Woody Plants, and Hypotheses for Its Occurrence

    Barbara Lachenbruch;John R. Moore;Robert Evans

  • Traits, properties, and performance: how woody plants combine hydraulic and mechanical functions in a cell, tissue, or whole plant.

    Barbara Lachenbruch;Katherine A. McCulloh

  • Moving water well: comparing hydraulic efficiency in twigs and trunks of coniferous, ring-porous, and diffuse- porous saplings from temperate and tropical forests

    Katherine A. McCulloh;John S. Sperry;Barbara Lachenbruch;Frederick C. Meinzer

  • Bordered pit structure and function determine spatial patterns of air‐seeding thresholds in xylem of Douglas‐fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii; Pinaceae) trees

    Jean-Christophe Domec;Barbara Lachenbruch;Frederick C. Meinzer

  • The blind men and the elephant: the impact of context and scale in evaluating conflicts between plant hydraulic safety and efficiency.

    Frederick C. Meinzer;Katherine A. McCulloh;Barbara Lachenbruch;David R. Woodruff

  • Transgenic poplars with reduced lignin show impaired xylem conductivity, growth efficiency and survival.

    Steven L. Voelker;Barbara Lachenbruch;Frederi Ck C. Meinzer;Peter Kitin

  • Impacts of tree height on leaf hydraulic architecture and stomatal control in Douglas-fir

    David R. Woodruff;Katherine A. Mcculloh;Jeffrey M. Warren;Frederick C. Meinzer

  • Tyloses and Phenolic Deposits in Xylem Vessels Impede Water Transport in Low-Lignin Transgenic Poplars: A Study by Cryo-Fluorescence Microscopy

    Peter Kitin;Steven L. Voelker;Frederick C. Meinzer;Hans Beeckman

  • Climate-related trends in sapwood biophysical properties in two conifers: avoidance of hydraulic dysfunction through coordinated adjustments in xylem efficiency, safety and capacitance

    David M. Barnard;Frederick C. Meinzer;Barbara Lachenbruch;Katherine A. Mcculloh

  • SAFETY FACTORS FOR XYLEM FAILURE BY IMPLOSION AND AIR-SEEDING WITHIN ROOTS, TRUNKS AND BRANCHES OF YOUNG AND OLD CONIFER TREES

    Jean-Christophe Domec;Jeffrey M. Warren;Frederick C. Meinzer;Barbara Lachenbruch

  • Reduced wood stiffness and strength, and altered stem form, in young antisense 4CL transgenic poplars with reduced lignin contents

    Steven L. Voelker;Barbara Lachenbruch;Frederick C. Meinzer;Steven H. Strauss

  • Relationships of density, microfibril angle, and sound velocity with stiffness and strength in mature wood of Douglas-fir

    Barbara Lachenbruch;G. R. Johnson;G. Downes;R. Evans

  • Comparative hydraulic architecture of tropical tree species representing a range of successional stages and wood density

    Katherine A. McCulloh;Frederick C. Meinzer;John S. Sperry;Barbara Lachenbruch

  • Phytophthora ramorum Colonizes Tanoak Xylem and Is Associated with Reduced Stem Water Transport.

    J. L. Parke;E. Oh;S. Voelker;E. M. Hansen

  • Coordination of leaf structure and gas exchange along a height gradient in a tall conifer.

    D. R. Woodruff;Frederick C. Meinzer;Barbara Lachenbruch;D. M. Johnson

  • Hydraulic architecture of two species differing in wood density: opposing strategies in co-occurring tropical pioneer trees

    Katherine A. Mcculloh;Daniel M. Johnson;Frederick C. Meinzer;Steven L. Voelker

Frequent Co-Authors

Frederick C. Meinzer
Frederick C. Meinzer Oregon State University
Katherine A. McCulloh
Katherine A. McCulloh University of Wisconsin–Madison
Jean-Christophe Domec
Jean-Christophe Domec Bordeaux Sciences Agro
David R. Woodruff
David R. Woodruff US Forest Service
Daniel M. Johnson
Daniel M. Johnson University of Georgia
Steven H. Strauss
Steven H. Strauss Oregon State University
Jeffrey M. Warren
Jeffrey M. Warren Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Richard P. Guyette
Richard P. Guyette University of Missouri
John S. Sperry
John S. Sperry University of Utah
Hans Beeckman
Hans Beeckman Royal Museum for Central Africa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Barbara Lachenbruch

Trending Scientists