World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
60
Citations
13416
World Ranking
3257
National Ranking
1579

Kori Inkpen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kori Inkpen sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 202 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Kori Inkpen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kori Inkpen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kori Inkpen is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States and has an extensive research portfolio in computer science with a focus on human-AI interaction. Their work intersects multiple subfields including artificial intelligence, social psychology, human-computer interaction, health informatics, and computer science applications.

Inkpen's research covers a range of main topics such as:

  • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts

Their recent scholarly publications include:

  • "Advancing Human-AI Complementarity: The Impact of User Expertise and Algorithmic Tuning on Joint Decision Making," 2023, published in ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • "Who Goes First? Influences of Human-AI Workflow on Decision Making in Clinical Imaging," 2022, presented at the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency
  • "Investigations of Performance and Bias in Human-AI Teamwork in Hiring," 2022, featured in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "Perspectives: Creating Inclusive and Equitable Hybrid Meeting Experiences," 2023, from Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • "Dittos: Personalized, Embodied Agents That Participate in Meetings When You Are Unavailable," 2024, also in Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Kori Inkpen frequently collaborates with several scholars including Besmira Nushi, Keri Mallari, Carmelo Ardito, Rosa Lanzilotti, and Antonio Piccinno. These partnerships have contributed to multiple publications and research projects.

Their work has appeared predominantly in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Additionally, Inkpen has contributed to several books published by Springer Science+Business Media. These include multiple entries under the title "Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2021" which have accumulated significant citations over time.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction

    Saleema Amershi;Dan Weld;Mihaela Vorvoreanu;Adam Fourney

  • Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces

    Stacey D. Scott;M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale;Kori Inkpen

  • Using psychophysiological techniques to measure user experience with entertainment technologies

    Regan L. Mandryk;Kori M. Inkpen;Thomas W. Calvert

  • Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    Bo Begole;Jinwoo Kim;Kori Inkpen;Woontack Woo

  • A continuous and objective evaluation of emotional experience with interactive play environments

    Regan L. Mandryk;M. Stella Atkins;Kori M. Inkpen

  • GeneyTM: designing a collaborative activity for the palmTM handheld computer

    Arman Danesh;Kori Inkpen;Felix Lau;Keith Shu

  • Physiological indicators for the evaluation of co-located collaborative play

    Regan L. Mandryk;Kori M. Inkpen

  • Meerkat and Periscope: I Stream, You Stream, Apps Stream for Live Streams

    John C. Tang;Gina Venolia;Kori M. Inkpen

  • Understanding children's collaborative interactions in shared environments

    Stacey D. Scott;Regan L. Mandryk;Kori Inkpen

  • Playing together beats playing apart, especially for girls

    Kori Inkpen;Kellogg S. Booth;Maria Klawe;Rena Upitis

  • Gathering evidence: use of visual security cues in web browsers

    Tara Whalen;Kori M. Inkpen

  • Exploring communication and sharing between extended families

    Kimberly Tee;A.J. Bernheim Brush;Kori M. Inkpen

  • Designing handheld technologies for kids

    Kori M. Inkpen

  • Co-Located Collaborative Visual Analytics around a Tabletop Display

    P. Isenberg;D. Fisher;S. A. Paul;M. R. Morris

  • This is fun! we're all best friends and we're all playing: supporting children's synchronous collaboration

    Kori M. Inkpen;Wai-ling Ho-Ching;Oliver Kuederle;Stacey D. Scott

  • Drag-and-drop versus point-and-click mouse interaction styles for children

    Kori M. Inkpen

  • Embodied social proxy: mediating interpersonal connection in hub-and-satellite teams

    Gina Venolia;John Tang;Ruy Cervantes;Sara Bly

  • Single display privacyware: augmenting public displays with private information

    Garth B. D. Shoemaker;Kori M. Inkpen

  • Understanding Multi-touch Manipulation for Surface Computing

    Chris North;Tim Dwyer;Bongshin Lee;Danyel Fisher

  • That one there! Pointing to establish device identity

    Colin Swindells;Kori M. Inkpen;John C. Dill;Melanie Tory

  • Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    Bo Begole;Jinwoo Kim;Kori Inkpen;Woontack Woo

Frequent Co-Authors

John C. Tang
John C. Tang Microsoft (United States)
Gina Venolia
Gina Venolia Microsoft (United States)
Regan L. Mandryk
Regan L. Mandryk University of Victoria
Maria Klawe
Maria Klawe Harvey Mudd College
Mary Czerwinski
Mary Czerwinski Microsoft (United States)
Kellogg S. Booth
Kellogg S. Booth University of British Columbia
George G. Robertson
George G. Robertson Microsoft (United States)
Zhengyou Zhang
Zhengyou Zhang Tencent (China)
A. J. Bernheim Brush
A. J. Bernheim Brush Microsoft (United States)
Ece Kamar
Ece Kamar Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Computer Science offers several flexible online degree pathways for aspiring professionals and those looking to advance their careers. Whether you're aiming for a quick credential or a valuable graduate degree, online learning provides many options to align with your goals.

If you're eager to accelerate your education, consider quickest masters degree online programs, which can be completed in as little as one year. These expedited degrees can help you fast-track your entry into specialized roles without a lengthy time commitment.

For those seeking return on investment, programs ranked among the most valuable masters degrees are in high demand, especially in areas like Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity, and Data Science.

If you’re looking for a fast entry point to the tech workforce or want to build foundational skills, 1 year associate degree programs online are a practical starting place.

Affordability remains a key concern for many students. Exploring the cheapest online degrees can help minimize debt while gaining a high-quality education. With a range of flexible, reputable options available, choosing the right online pathway can create strong opportunities in the evolving tech landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Kori Inkpen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles