World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Petra K. Staiger

Petra K. Staiger

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 40 5377 4988 387 371 150 6499

Petra K. Staiger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Petra K. Staiger between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Petra K. Staiger published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2019. 13 of the 164 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2019. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 4 publications
1988 2025

164 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Petra K. Staiger: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 1
1990 0
1991 2
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 3
1999 2
2000 4
2001 3
2002 0
2003 2
2004 6
2005 2
2006 0
2007 6
2008 2
2009 4
2010 8
2011 7
2012 3
2013 6
2014 10
2015 2
2016 12
2017 14
2018 8
2019 19
2020 5
2021 7
2022 9
2023 3
2024 9
2025 4
Total 164
Download as CSV

Petra K. Staiger publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Petra K. Staiger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 144–153 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 150 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407 150
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Petra K. Staiger D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Petra K. Staiger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297 40
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Petra K. Staiger is affiliated with Deakin University in Australia and has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology and medicine. Their research spans 48 publications in psychology and 21 in medicine, with significant focus on applied, clinical, experimental and cognitive, and social psychology subfields. The scientist's work addresses areas including behavioral health and interventions, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, anxiety, depression and cognitive processes, digital mental health interventions, LGBTQ health and identity, and sexuality, behavior, and technology.

Staiger has published articles in several academic venues, frequently contributing to:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • JAMA Psychiatry
  • Addiction
  • British Journal of General Practice
  • Clinical Psychologist

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Staiger include:

  • Mobile Apps to Reduce Tobacco, Alcohol, and Illicit Drug Use: Systematic Review of the First Decade (2020), Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Effect of Cognitive Bias Modification on Early Relapse Among Adults Undergoing Inpatient Alcohol Withdrawal Treatment (2020), JAMA Psychiatry (authored by Victoria Manning, highly cited)
  • Cognitive training and remediation interventions for substance use disorders: a Delphi consensus study (2022), Addiction
  • Examining Health-Related Effects of Refurbishment to Parks in a Lower Socioeconomic Area: The ShadePlus Natural Experiment (2020), International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Alcohol use in the year following approach bias modification during inpatient withdrawal: secondary outcomes from a double-blind, multi-site randomized controlled trial (2022), Addiction

The scientist collaborates frequently with other researchers, with notable coauthors including:

  • Victoria Manning
  • Dan I. Lubman
  • Hugh Piercy
  • Joshua B. B. Garfield
  • Kate Hall

Staiger's research emphasizes digital and behavioral interventions in mental health, particularly addressing substance abuse and its treatment outcomes. Their contributions include examining the effects of cognitive bias modification, use of mobile applications for substance use reduction, and evaluation of public health impacts of environmental interventions.

Best Publications

  • Emotion regulation as a transdiagnostic treatment construct across anxiety, depression, substance, eating and borderline personality disorders: A systematic review

    Elise Sloan;Kate Hall;Richard Moulding;Shayden Bryce

  • Effect of Western culture on women's attitudes to eating and perceptions of body shape.

    Amelia J. Lake;Petra K. Staiger;Huguette Glowinski

  • The association between sports participation, alcohol use and aggression and violence: A systematic review

    Anders Larrabee Sonderlund;Kerry Steven O'Brien;Peter J Kremer;Bosco C Rowland

  • Does the tendency to act impulsively underlie binge eating and alcohol use problems? An empirical investigation

    Tamsin A. Kane;Natalie June Loxton;Petra K. Staiger;Sharon Dawe

  • Expanding Children’s Food Experiences: The Impact of a School-Based Kitchen Garden Program

    Lisa Gibbs;Petra K. Staiger;Britt Johnson;Karen Block

  • Growing Community: The Impact of the Stephanie Alexander Kitchen Garden Program on the Social and Learning Environment in Primary Schools

    Karen Block;Lisa Gibbs;Petra K Staiger;Lisa Gold

  • The influence of sensitivity to reward on reactivity to alcohol-related cues.

    Nicolas Kambouropoulos;Petra K. Staiger

  • After 30 years of dissemination, have we achieved sustained practice change in motivational interviewing?

    Kate Hall;Kate Hall;Petra K. Staiger;Angela Simpson;Angela Simpson;David Best;David Best;David Best

  • Alcohol expectancies and drinking refusal self-efficacy mediate the association of impulsivity with alcohol misuse.

    Matthew John Gullo;Sharon Dawe;Nicolas Kambouropoulos;Petra K. Staiger

  • Improving family functioning and child outcome in methadone maintained families: the Parents Under Pressure programme

    Sharon Dawe;Paul Harnett;Vanessa Marie Rendalls;Petra Staiger

  • Cue reactivity in alcohol abusers: stimulus specificity and extinction of the responses.

    Petra K. Staiger;Jason M. White

  • Cognitive Bias Modification Training During Inpatient Alcohol Detoxification Reduces Early Relapse: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

    Victoria Manning;Victoria Manning;Petra K. Staiger;Kate Hall;Joshua B.B. Garfield;Joshua B.B. Garfield

  • Rural Adolescent Alcohol, Tobacco, and Illicit Drug Use: A Comparison of Students in Victoria, Australia, and Washington State, United States

    Kerri Coomber;John W. Toumbourou;Peter Miller;Petra K. Staiger

  • Can emotion-focused coping help explain the link between posttraumatic stress disorder severity and triggers for substance use in young adults?

    Petra Karin Staiger;Fritha Melville;Leanne Hides;Nicolas Kambouropoulos

  • Children who are cruel to animals: a revisit.

    Ernest S. L. Luk;Petra K. Staiger;Lisa Wong;John Mathai

  • Should personality traits be considered when refining substance misuse treatment programs

    Petra K. Staiger;Nicolas Kambouropoulos;Sharon Dawe

  • Reactivity to alcohol-related cues: relationship among cue type, motivational processes, and personality

    Nicolas Kambouropoulos;Petra K. Staiger

  • Overlooked and underestimated? Problematic alcohol use in clients recovering from drug dependence

    Petra K. Staiger;Ben Richardson;Caroline M. Long;Victoria Carr

  • Children with persistent conduct problems who dropout of treatment.

    Ernest Luk;P. K. Staiger;John Mathai;Lisa Wong

  • Male Domestic Violence Attitudes, Aggression, and Interpersonal Dependency

    Tamsin A. Kane;Petra K. Staiger;Line A. Ricciardelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Dan I. Lubman
Dan I. Lubman Monash University
David Best
David Best University of Derby
Victoria Manning
Victoria Manning Monash University
Antonio Verdejo-García
Antonio Verdejo-García Monash University
Sharon Dawe
Sharon Dawe Griffith University
Catherine Haslam
Catherine Haslam University of Queensland
Genevieve A. Dingle
Genevieve A. Dingle University of Queensland
Jarrad A. G. Lum
Jarrad A. G. Lum Deakin University
Marita P. McCabe
Marita P. McCabe Swinburne University of Technology
Michael Kyrios
Michael Kyrios Flinders University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding career paths. Many students are now considering online degree options for their flexibility and affordability. Popular fields like counseling, psychology, social work, and marriage and family therapy all offer accessible online programs with strong career prospects.

If you are interested in becoming a counselor, consider researching cacrep accredited online masters counseling programs. These programs ensure you meet national standards and are prepared for licensing exams. For those passionate about supporting couples and families, you might look into marriage and family masters programs that combine theory with practical experience.

Cost is a significant factor for many, so learning about psychology degree cost can help you plan your education and reduce student debt. Social work is another growing field, and you can compare online msw programs by their accessibility and entrance requirements.

By exploring these related online degrees, you can find the best pathway to launching your career in social sciences or humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Petra K. Staiger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles