World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Matthew J. Gullo

Matthew J. Gullo

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
4718
World Ranking
10868
National Ranking
627

Matthew J. Gullo publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew J. Gullo sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 110 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Matthew J. Gullo D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew J. Gullo sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthew J. Gullo is a researcher affiliated with Griffith University in Australia, focusing primarily on psychology and medicine. Their academic work emphasizes clinical psychology, general health professions, epidemiology, sociology and political science, and applied psychology. This multidisciplinary approach connects psychological theory with broader health and social issues.

Their research spans various interconnected topics. Key areas of study include substance abuse treatment and outcomes, the impact of technology on adolescents, behavioral health and interventions, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, eating disorders and behaviors, child development and digital technology, and child abuse and trauma.

Matthew J. Gullo's work appears in a range of academic venues, frequently publishing in journals such as Addictive Behaviors, PsycTESTS Dataset, Computers in Human Behavior, Personality and Individual Differences, and Addiction. These venues reflect the diversity of their research topics and methods.

Several recent papers illustrate their research interests and publication record:

  • "The impact of eSports and online video gaming on lifestyle behaviours in youth: A systematic review" (2021) in Computers in Human Behavior
  • "New Australian guidelines for the treatment of alcohol problems: an overview of recommendations" (2021) in The Medical Journal of Australia
  • "Impulsivity traits and Facebook addiction in young people and the potential mediating role of coping styles" (2020) in Personality and Individual Differences
  • "A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between youth drinking, self-posting of alcohol use and other social media engagement (2012-21)" (2023) in Addiction
  • "Lived experiences of the diagnostic assessment process for fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: A systematic review of qualitative evidence" (2023) in Alcohol Clinical and Experimental Research

The researcher collaborates frequently with a number of colleagues. Their most recurrent coauthors include Jason P. Connor, Gerald F.X. Feeney, Ross McD. Young, Gary Chan, and Nicole Hayes. These collaborations highlight ongoing partnerships contributing to their research outputs.

Best Publications

  • Reward drive and rash impulsiveness as dimensions of impulsivity: implications for substance misuse.

    Sharon Dawe;Matthew John Gullo;Natalie June Loxton

  • Polysubstance use: diagnostic challenges, patterns of use and health

    Jason P. Connor;Matthew J. Gullo;Angela White;Adrian B. Kelly

  • Impulsivity and adolescent substance use: rashly dismissed as "all-bad"?

    Matthew John Gullo;Sharon Dawe

  • Multiple behavioural impulsivity tasks predict prospective alcohol involvement in adolescents.

    Gordon Fernie;Margot Peeters;Matthew J. Gullo;Paul Christiansen

  • A transdiagnostic dimensional approach towards a neuropsychological assessment for addiction: an international Delphi consensus study

    Murat Yücel;Erin Oldenhof;Serge H. Ahmed;David Belin

  • Impulsivity: Four ways five factors are not basic to addiction

    Matthew J. Gullo;Natalie J. Loxton;Natalie J. Loxton;Sharon Dawe;Sharon Dawe

  • A prospective study of alcohol expectancies and self-efficacy as predictors of young adolescent alcohol misuse

    J.P. Connor;S.M. George;M.J. Gullo;A.B. Kelly

  • Alcohol expectancies and drinking refusal self-efficacy mediate the association of impulsivity with alcohol misuse.

    Matthew John Gullo;Sharon Dawe;Nicolas Kambouropoulos;Petra K. Staiger

  • The impact of eSports and online video gaming on lifestyle behaviours in youth: A systematic review

    Gary Chan;Yan Huo;Sarah Kelly;Janni Leung

  • The influence of episodic foresight on delay discounting and demand for alcohol.

    Adam Bulley;Matthew J. Gullo

  • Examining potential risk factors for anxiety in early childhood.

    Kristine M. Pahl;Paula M. Barrett;Matthew J. Gullo

  • New Australian guidelines for the treatment of alcohol problems: an overview of recommendations

    Paul S Haber;Benjamin C Riordan;Daniel T Winter;Liz Barrett

  • Independence of Hot and Cold Executive Function Deficits in High-Functioning Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

    David L. Zimmerman;Tamara Ownsworth;Analise O'Donovan;Jacqueline Roberts

  • Polysubstance use in cannabis users referred for treatment: drug use profiles, psychiatric comorbidity and cannabis-related beliefs.

    Jason Paul Connor;Jason Paul Connor;Matthew J Gullo;Matthew J Gullo;Gary Chan;Ross McDonald Young;Ross McDonald Young

  • A randomized controlled trial of prospective memory rehabilitation in adults with traumatic brain injury

    David Shum;Jennifer Fleming;Jennifer Fleming;Hannah Gill;Matthew John Gullo

  • Validation of the Cannabis Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) in adult cannabis users in treatment.

    Jason P. Connor;Matthew J. Gullo;Matthew J. Gullo;Gerald F.X. Feeney;Gerald F.X. Feeney;Ross McD. Young;Ross McD. Young;Ross McD. Young

  • Support for a two-factor model of impulsivity and hazardous substance use in British and Australian young adults

    M. J. Gullo;E. Ward;S. Dawe;J. Powell

  • Predictors of prospective memory in adults with traumatic brain injury.

    Jennifer Fleming;Lee Riley;Hannah Gill;Matthew John Gullo

  • Differential segmentation responses to an alcohol social marketing program

    Timo Dietrich;Sharyn Rundle-Thiele;Lisa Schuster;Judy Drennan

  • Cuing both positive and negative episodic foresight reduces delay discounting but does not affect risk-taking.

    Adam Bulley;Beyon Miloyan;Gillian V Pepper;Matthew J Gullo

  • A prospective study of alcohol expectancies and self-efficacy as predictors of young adolescent alcohol misuse

    Jason Connor;S. George;Matthew Gullo;Adrian Kelly

Frequent Co-Authors

Jason P. Connor
Jason P. Connor University of Queensland
Ross McD. Young
Ross McD. Young University of the Sunshine Coast
Sharon Dawe
Sharon Dawe Griffith University
David J. Kavanagh
David J. Kavanagh Queensland University of Technology
Natalie J. Loxton
Natalie J. Loxton Griffith University
Adrian B. Kelly
Adrian B. Kelly Queensland University of Technology
Matt Field
Matt Field University of Sheffield
Chris J. Jackson
Chris J. Jackson University of New South Wales
Jennifer Fleming
Jennifer Fleming University of Queensland
Sharyn Rundle-Thiele
Sharyn Rundle-Thiele Griffith University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology and counseling opens up a range of career pathways in mental health, education, and social services. Many accredited U.S. universities offer flexible online programs, making it easier for students nationwide to access quality education.

Choosing the right program is crucial. For those interested in urban environments, popular counseling degrees in San Francisco provide insights into programs with diverse coursework and field experiences. Similarly, students looking for quality education in smaller cities can consider the best-ranked counseling degree programs in Stockton.

Regional factors often impact program popularity, specializations, and job prospects. For example, popular counseling degrees in Texas highlight programs tailored to local demographics and clinical demand.

If you’re deciding on a career in counseling or psychology, reviewing the popular counseling programs in the US can help you compare national trends, curricula, and career outcomes. This research can guide you toward the best online degree to match your goals and location.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew J. Gullo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles