World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
42
Citations
10688
World Ranking
4634
National Ranking
2204

James M. Raczynski publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Raczynski sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 302 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 115 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

James M. Raczynski D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Raczynski sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 261 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

James M. Raczynski is affiliated with the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Health Professions, with specific subfields including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Philosophy.

Their work covers several interconnected main topics:

  • Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
  • Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Health, Medicine and Society

James M. Raczynski's recent publications include:

  • Relationship of Psychological Characteristics to Daily Life Ischemia: An Analysis From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Psychophysiological Investigations in Myocardial Ischemia (2022, Psychosomatic Medicine)
  • Relationship of Psychological Characteristics to Daily Life Ischemia: An Analysis From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Psychophysiological Investigations in Myocardial Ischemia (2022, PubMed)

The scientist frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including:

  • Osama Dasa
  • Mahmoud Ahmed
  • Peter Kaufmann
  • Peter H. Stone
  • Eileen Handberg

Publications by James M. Raczynski commonly appear in venues such as Psychosomatic Medicine and PubMed. Their work tends to integrate psychological and physiological perspectives to explore ischemia and cardiac health in daily life, reflecting interdisciplinary approaches within health professions and cardiology.

Best Publications

  • Effects of treating depression and low perceived social support on clinical events after myocardial infarction: the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Patients (ENRICHD) Randomized Trial.

    Lisa F Berkman;James Blumenthal;Matthew Burg;Robert M Carney

  • The Effects of Nonpharmacologic Interventions on Blood Pressure of Persons With High Normal Levels: Results of the Trials of Hypertension Prevention, Phase I

    Paul K. Whelton;Lawrence Appel;Jeanne Charleston;Arlene Taylor Dalcin

  • Effect of a community intervention on patient delay and emergency medical service use in acute coronary heart disease: The Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) Trial.

    Russell V. Luepker;James M. Raczynski;Stavroula K. Osganian;Robert J. Goldberg

  • Increasing the Fruit and Vegetable Consumption of Fourth-Graders: Results from the High 5 Project☆☆☆

    Kim D. Reynolds;Frank A. Franklin;Dianne Binkley;James M. Raczynski

  • Ischemic, Hemodynamic, and Neurohormonal Responses to Mental and Exercise Stress Experience From the Psychophysiological Investigations of Myocardial Ischemia Study (PIMI)

    A. David Goldberg;Lewis C. Becker;Robert Bonsall;Jerome D. Cohen

  • Mental Stress-Induced Ischemia and All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Results From the Psychophysiological Investigations of Myocardial Ischemia Study

    David S. Sheps;Robert P. McMahon;Lewis Becker;Robert M. Carney

  • Body image among men and women in a biracial cohort : The CARDIA study

    Delia E. Smith;Joel Kevin Thompson;James M. Raczynski;Joan E. Hilner

  • Patient delay in seeking care for heart attack symptoms: findings from focus groups conducted in five U.S. regions.

    John R. Finnegan;Hendrika Meischke;Jane G. Zapka;Laura Leviton

  • Cardiovascular reactivity to video game predicts subsequent blood pressure increases in young men: The CARDIA study.

    Jerome H. Markovitz;James M. Raczynski;Dennis Wallace;Vinod Chettur

  • The Depression Interview and Structured Hamilton (DISH): rationale, development, characteristics, and clinical validity.

    Kenneth E Freedland;Judith A Skala;Robert M Carney;James M Raczynski

  • Alcohol intake and blood pressure in young adults: the CARDIA Study.

    Alan R. Dyer;Gary R. Cutter;Kiang Liu;Mary Anne Armstrong

  • Overweight children, weight-based teasing and academic performance

    Rebecca A. Krukowski;Delia Smith West;Amanda Philyaw Perez;Zoran Bursac

  • Sufficient conditions for effective treatment of substance abusing homeless persons

    Jesse B. Milby;Joseph E. Schumacher;James M. Raczynski;Ellen Caldwell

  • Psychosocial treatment within sex by ethnicity subgroups in the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease clinical trial.

    Neil Schneiderman;Patrice G. Saab;Diane J. Catellier;Lynda H. Powell

  • Methods to encourage the use of antenatal corticosteroid therapy for fetal maturation. A randomized controlled trial

    Laura C. Leviton;Laura C. Leviton;Robert L. Goldenberg;C. Suzanne Baker;Rachel M. Schwartz

  • Weight gain with breast cancer adjuvant treatment.

    Ellen G. Levine;James M. Raczynski;John T. Carpenter

  • Parental recognition of overweight in school-age children.

    Delia S. West;James M. Raczynski;Martha M. Phillips;Zoran Bursac

  • Neuromuscular activity and electromyography in painful backs: Psychological and biomechanical models in assessment and treatment.

    Jeffrey J. Dolce;James M. Raczynski

  • Diagnoses, symptoms, and attribution of symptoms among black and white inpatients admitted for coronary heart disease.

    J M Raczynski;H Taylor;G Cutter;M Hardin

  • The role of self-efficacy expectancies in the prediction of pain tolerance.

    Jeffrey J. Dolce;Daniel M. Doleys;James M. Raczynski;John Lossie

  • Adherence in the Training Levels Comparison Trial

    Jeannette Y. Lee;Betsy E. Jensen;Albert Oberman;Gerald F. Fletcher

Frequent Co-Authors

Cora E. Lewis
Cora E. Lewis University of Alabama at Birmingham
Kim D. Reynolds
Kim D. Reynolds Claremont Graduate University
David S. Krantz
David S. Krantz Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Kenneth E. Freedland
Kenneth E. Freedland Washington University in St. Louis
Ralph J. DiClemente
Ralph J. DiClemente New York University
Margaret A. Chesney
Margaret A. Chesney University of California, San Francisco
Neil Schneiderman
Neil Schneiderman University of Miami
Lisa F. Berkman
Lisa F. Berkman Harvard University
Nancy R. Cook
Nancy R. Cook Brigham and Women's Hospital
Linda P. Fried
Linda P. Fried Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities offers a variety of flexible online degree options tailored to diverse career interests. For those focused on clinical practice in psychology, psyd programs provide advanced study in counseling and therapy, leading to opportunities as licensed psychologists. If your goal is to quickly enter the field as a marriage and family therapist, accelerated mft programs allow you to complete your credentials in a shorter timeframe.

Many students also consider a masters in psychology online to deepen their understanding of human behavior and open doors to roles in research, education, or human services. For those interested in leadership within educational institutions or policy, edd online programs offer a streamlined path to advanced administrative positions.

Online programs make it easier than ever to balance studies with work or family commitments while preparing for rewarding careers in fields related to social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing James M. Raczynski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles