World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Andrew C. N. Chen

Andrew C. N. Chen

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
53
Citations
7179
World Ranking
5193
National Ranking
76

Andrew C. N. Chen publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew C. N. Chen sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 241 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Andrew C. N. Chen D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew C. N. Chen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew C. N. Chen is affiliated with Capital Medical University in China. Their research profile reflects an academic career grounded at this institution.

There are no recent papers, co-authors, or specific publication venues listed for Andrew C. N. Chen. Consequently, details regarding the scientist's recent scholarly output or collaborative networks are not available.

Information regarding book publications is also not provided, so there is no data on any monographs or edited volumes authored or contributed to by Andrew C. N. Chen.

The main fields, subfields, and primary topics of study related to this scientist have not been specified, leaving the exact scientific focus areas undefined.

No awards or honors have been recorded, and there is no indication of any recognitions received within their academic career.

Andrew C. N. Chen is currently living, and no further biographical details or research metrics are available in the provided data.

Best Publications

  • EEG default mode network in the human brain: spectral regional field powers.

    Andrew C.N. Chen;Weijia Feng;Huixuan Zhao;Yanling Yin

  • Relations between brain network activation and analgesic effect induced by low vs. high frequency electrical acupoint stimulation in different subjects: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study

    Wei-Ting Zhang;Zhen Jin;Guo-Hong Cui;Kui-Ling Zhang

  • Automatic recognition of alertness and drowsiness from EEG by an artificial neural network.

    Aleksandra Vuckovic;Vlada Radivojevic;Andrew C.N. Chen;Dejan Popovic

  • Brain evoked potentials are functional correlates of induced pain in man.

    Andrew C.N. Chen;C. Richard Chapman;Stephen W. Harkins

  • Intact skull chronic windows for mesoscopic wide-field imaging in awake mice.

    Gergely Silasi;Dongsheng Xiao;Matthieu P. Vanni;Andrew C.N. Chen

  • Contact heat evoked potentials as a valid means to study nociceptive pathways in human subjects

    Andrew C.N Chen;David M Niddam;Lars Arendt-Nielsen

  • Dynamic changes and spatial correlation of EEG activities during cold pressor test in man.

    Peng Fei Chang;Lars Arendt-Nielsen;Andrew C.N Chen

  • Lasers and other thermal stimulators for activation of skin nociceptors in humans.

    Lars Arendt-Nielsen;Andrew C. N. Chen

  • A comparative study of different references for EEG spectral mapping: the issue of the neutral reference and the use of the infinity reference.

    Dezhong Yao;Dezhong Yao;Li Wang;Robert Oostenveld;Robert Oostenveld;Kim Dremstrup Nielsen

  • New perspectives in EEG/MEG brain mapping and PET/fMRI neuroimaging of human pain.

    Andrew C.N. Chen

  • Anticipatory Electroencephalography Alpha Rhythm Predicts Subjective Perception of Pain Intensity

    Claudio Babiloni;Alfredo Brancucci;Alfredo Brancucci;Claudio Del Percio;Paolo Capotosto;Paolo Capotosto

  • Mapping cortical mesoscopic networks of single spiking cortical or sub-cortical neurons

    Dongsheng Xiao;Dongsheng Xiao;Matthieu P. Vanni;Catalin C. Mitelut;Allen W. Chan

  • Dipolar modelling of the scalp evoked potentials to painful contact heat stimulation of the human skin

    Massimiliano Valeriani;Domenica Le Pera;David Niddam;Andrew C.N Chen

  • Brain and Human Pain: Topographic EEG Amplitude and Coherence Mapping

    Andrew C. N. Chen;Peter Rappelsberger

  • Human brain oscillatory activity phase-locked to painful electrical stimulations: A multi-channel EEG study

    Claudio Babiloni;Fabio Babiloni;Filippo Carducci;Febo Cincotti

  • Anticipatory cortical responses during the expectancy of a predictable painful stimulation. A high-resolution electroencephalography study

    Claudio Babiloni;Alfredo Brancucci;Alfredo Brancucci;Fabio Babiloni;Paolo Capotosto

  • Anticipation of somatosensory and motor events increases centro-parietal functional coupling: an EEG coherence study.

    Claudio Babiloni;Alfredo Brancucci;Alfredo Brancucci;Fabrizio Vecchio;Lars Arendt-Nielsen

  • Mapping of early and late human somatosensory evoked brain potentials to phasic galvanic painful stimulation.

    Claudio Babiloni;Fabio Babiloni;Filippo Carducci;Febo Cincotti

  • The McGill pain questionnaire in the assessment of phasic and tonic experimental pain: behavioral evaluation of the ‘pain inhibiting pain’ effect

    Andrew C.N. Chen;Rolf-Detlef Treede

  • Perception of pain coincides with the spatial expansion of electroencephalographic dynamics in human subjects.

    Andrew C.N Chen;Christoph S Herrmann

  • EEG default mode network in the human brain: Spectral regional field powers

    A.C.N. Chen;Y.I. Feng;H.X. Zhao;Y.L. Yin

Frequent Co-Authors

Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Lars Arendt-Nielsen Aalborg University
Claudio Babiloni
Claudio Babiloni Sapienza University of Rome
Dezhong Yao
Dezhong Yao University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Peter Svensson
Peter Svensson Aarhus University
Paolo Maria Rossini
Paolo Maria Rossini Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Fabio Babiloni
Fabio Babiloni Sapienza University of Rome
Thomas Graven-Nielsen
Thomas Graven-Nielsen Aalborg University
Robert Oostenveld
Robert Oostenveld Radboud University
Filippo Carducci
Filippo Carducci Sapienza University of Rome
Febo Cincotti
Febo Cincotti Sapienza University of Rome

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Andrew C. N. Chen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles