World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Natalie J. Loxton

Natalie J. Loxton

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
5855
World Ranking
10436
National Ranking
596

Natalie J. Loxton publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalie J. Loxton sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 95 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Natalie J. Loxton D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalie J. Loxton sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Natalie J. Loxton is affiliated with Griffith University in Australia, with a research focus primarily in Psychology. Their work spans several subfields including Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Statistics and Probability, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist's research covers multiple topics, notably Eating Disorders and Behaviors, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders, Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies, Statistics Education and Methodologies, Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet, and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes.

Key frequent co-authors working alongside Natalie J. Loxton include Renata A. Mendes, Caroline L. Donovan, Laura Uhlmann, Chloe Kidd, and Daniel R. Wilson.

Publications are often found in venues such as Body Image, European Eating Disorders Review, European Journal of Psychology of Education, Eating Behaviors, and Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

Significant recent papers authored or co-authored by them include:

  • Investigating the relationship between reward sensitivity, impulsivity, and food addiction: A systematic review, 2020, European Eating Disorders Review
  • Strong is the New Skinny, but is it Ideal?: A Test of the Tripartite Influence Model using a new Measure of Fit-Ideal Internalisation, 2020, Body Image
  • A narrative review of reward sensitivity, rash impulsivity, and food addiction in adolescents, 2021, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
  • Health Professionals' and Health Professional Trainees' Views on Addictive Eating Behaviours: A Cross-Sectional Survey, 2020, Nutrients
  • Reciprocal relations between past behavior, implicit beliefs, and habits: A cross-lagged panel design, 2023, Journal of Health Psychology

Best Publications

  • The role of impulsivity in the development of substance use and eating disorders

    Sharon Dawe;Natalie June Loxton

  • Reward drive and rash impulsiveness as dimensions of impulsivity: implications for substance misuse.

    Sharon Dawe;Matthew John Gullo;Natalie June Loxton

  • Alcohol abuse and dysfunctional eating in adolescent girls: The influence of individual differences in sensitivity to reward and punishment

    Natalie June Loxton;Sharon Dawe

  • The relationship between sociocultural pressure to be thin and body dissatisfaction in preadolescent girls

    Lucy C Blowers;Natalie J Loxton;Megan Grady-Flesser;Stefano Occhipinti

  • Review of diagnostic screening instruments for alcohol and other drug use and other psychiatric disorders

    Sharon Dawe;Natalie J. Loxton;Leanne Hides;David J. Kavanagh

  • 'Food addiction' and its association with a dopaminergic multilocus genetic profile.

    Caroline Davis;Natalie J. Loxton;Robert D. Levitan;Allan S. Kaplan

  • Does the tendency to act impulsively underlie binge eating and alcohol use problems? An empirical investigation

    Tamsin A. Kane;Natalie June Loxton;Petra K. Staiger;Sharon Dawe

  • Impulsivity: Four ways five factors are not basic to addiction

    Matthew J. Gullo;Natalie J. Loxton;Natalie J. Loxton;Sharon Dawe;Sharon Dawe

  • Reward drive, rash impulsivity and punishment sensitivity in problem gamblers

    Natalie J. Loxton;Dan Duc Nguyen;Leanne Michelle Casey;Sharon Dawe

  • Investigating the relationship between reward sensitivity, impulsivity, and food addiction: A systematic review

    Aimee L. Maxwell;Elliroma Gardiner;Natalie J. Loxton;Natalie J. Loxton

  • Reward and punishment sensitivity in dysfunctional eating and hazardous drinking women: Associations with family risk

    Natalie June Loxton;Sharon Dawe

  • Compulsive "grazing" and addictive tendencies towards food.

    Revi Bonder;Caroline Davis;Jennifer L. Kuk;Natalie J. Loxton

  • Does negative mood drive the urge to eat? The contribution of negative mood, exposure to food cues and eating style

    Natalie J. Loxton;Sharon Dawe;Allison Louise Cahill

  • Reward sensitivity and food addiction in women.

    Natalie J. Loxton;Natalie J. Loxton;Renée J. Tipman

  • Association between MC4R rs17782313 polymorphism and overeating behaviors.

    Zeynep Yilmaz;Caroline Davis;Natalie J. Loxton;Allan S. Kaplan

  • Dependent heroin use and associated risky behaviour: The role of rash impulsiveness and reward sensitivity

    Lakal Odatha Dissabandara;Lakal Odatha Dissabandara;Natalie J. Loxton;Shavindra R. Dias;Peter R. Dodd

  • Don't stop till you get enough: Factors driving men towards muscularity.

    Richard Stratton;Caroline Donovan;Shannon Bramwell;Natalie J. Loxton

  • Addictive behaviors and addiction-prone personality traits: associations with a dopamine multilocus genetic profile.

    Caroline Davis;Natalie June Loxton

  • Strong is the New Skinny, but is it Ideal?: A Test of the Tripartite Influence Model using a new Measure of Fit-Ideal Internalisation.

    Caroline L. Donovan;Laura R. Uhlmann;Natalie J. Loxton

  • How do dysfunctional eating and hazardous drinking women perform on behavioural measures of reward and punishment sensitivity

    Natalie June Loxton;Sharon Dawe

  • Testing the fear and anxiety distinction in the BIS/BAS scales in community and heroin-dependent samples.

    Lakal Odatha Dissabandara;Lakal Odatha Dissabandara;Lakal Odatha Dissabandara;Natalie J. Loxton;Shavindra R. Dias;Mark Daglish

Frequent Co-Authors

Sharon Dawe
Sharon Dawe Griffith University
Matthew J. Gullo
Matthew J. Gullo Griffith University
Caroline Davis
Caroline Davis York University
Chris J. Jackson
Chris J. Jackson University of New South Wales
Peter R. Dodd
Peter R. Dodd University of Queensland
Leanne Hides
Leanne Hides University of Queensland
Genevieve A. Dingle
Genevieve A. Dingle University of Queensland
Zane B. Andrews
Zane B. Andrews Monash University
Robert D. Levitan
Robert D. Levitan Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
James L. Kennedy
James L. Kennedy Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to diverse career options, from counseling to clinical practice. However, becoming a licensed professional counselor (LPC) typically requires a mix of education, supervised experience, and successful completion of state licensure exams.

Online psychology degrees often offer flexible pathways to meet these requirements, but licensure standards can differ greatly. For instance, those interested in practicing in Delaware should review the Delaware licensed professional counselor requirements to understand coursework and practicum expectations. If you are considering work in Florida, it’s essential to learn about the lpc licensure requirements in Florida, which outline supervised fieldwork and eligibility criteria.

Similarly, the lpc licensure requirements in Georgia and Hawaii lpc licensure requirements detail state-specific education and testing standards. Before enrolling in any online psychology program, prospective students should carefully check state regulations to ensure their chosen degree aligns with their intended licensure and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Natalie J. Loxton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles