World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lynda D. Corkum

Lynda D. Corkum

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 36 9135 8758 422 397 95 5251

Lynda D. Corkum publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lynda D. Corkum between 1977 and 2018, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lynda D. Corkum published across 42 years, from 1977 to 2018, averaging 2.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 6 publications in 1996. 2 of the 100 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2018. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 6. Peak 6 publications in 1996. 1977: 2 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 3 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication
1977 2018

100 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lynda D. Corkum: publications per year, 1977 to 2018
Year Publications
1977 2
1978 3
1979 1
1980 2
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 1
1985 3
1986 0
1987 2
1988 2
1989 3
1990 1
1991 1
1992 2
1993 0
1994 1
1995 2
1996 6
1997 4
1998 1
1999 3
2000 3
2001 3
2002 3
2003 4
2004 5
2005 4
2006 5
2007 4
2008 4
2009 3
2010 6
2011 3
2012 2
2013 5
2014 2
2015 1
2016 0
2017 1
2018 1
Total 100
Download as CSV

Lynda D. Corkum publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynda D. Corkum sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 95 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440 95
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Lynda D. Corkum D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynda D. Corkum sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206 36
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Lynda D. Corkum is affiliated with the University of Windsor in Canada. Their academic profile does not list specific recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, or book publications.

Although detailed information about research topics, main fields of study, and subfields is unavailable, the current data indicates no recorded awards or distinctions attributed to Lynda D. Corkum.

This profile reflects the available data up to the present and does not include additional information on research contributions or specific areas of expertise beyond the institutional association provided.

Best Publications

  • The round goby, Neogobius melanostomus, a fish invader on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean

    Lynda D. Corkum;Mariusz R. Sapota;Krzysztof E. Skora

  • Habitat and Site Affinity of the Round Goby

    William J. Ray;Lynda D. Corkum

  • Fecundity and Reproductive Season of the Round Goby Neogobius melanostomus in the Upper Detroit River

    Andrew J. MacInnis;Lynda D. Corkum

  • Behavioral Interactions Between Round Gobies (Neogobius melanostomus) and Mottled Sculpins (Cottus bairdi)

    Derek O.L. Dubs;Lynda D. Corkum

  • Predation of zebra mussels by round gobies, Neogobius melanostomus

    William J. Ray;Lynda D. Corkum

  • Inland dispersal of adult aquatic insects

    Zsolt Kovats;Jan Ciborowski;Lynda Corkum

  • Patterns of benthic invertebrate assemblages in rivers of northwestern North America

    Lynda D. Corkum

  • The Round Goby (Neogobius melanostomus) Invasion: Current Research and Future Needs

    Patrice M. Charlebois;Lynda D. Corkum;David J. Jude;Carey Knight

  • Comparison of Methods Needed to Estimate Population Size of Round Gobies (Neogobius melanostomus) in Western Lake Erie

    Timothy B. Johnson;Melissa Allen;Lynda D. Corkum;Victoria A. Lee

  • A Comparison of Methods for Sampling Fish Diversity in Shallow Offshore Waters of Large Rivers

    Nicolas W. R. Lapointe;Lynda D. Corkum;Nicholas E. Mandrak

  • Relationship between the spatial distribution of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) and the hydrological variability of rivers

    Joanne Di Maio;Lynda D. Corkum

  • First Documentation of Spawning and Nest Guarding in the Laboratory by the Invasive Fish, the Round Goby (Neogobius melanostomus)

    Benjamin Meunier;Stan Yavno;Sameen Ahmed;Lynda D. Corkum

  • Predation of zebra mussels by crayfish

    Gordon W. Martin;Lynda D. Corkum

  • Age and Growth of Round Goby Neogobius melanostomus in the Upper Detroit River

    Andrew J. MacInnis;Lynda D. Corkum

  • Habitat complexity reduces aggression and enhances consumption in crayfish

    Lynda D. Corkum;Daniel J. Cronin

  • The effect of current velocity and sediment on the drift of the mayfly Ephemerella subvaria Mcdunnough

    Jan J. H. Ciborowski;P. J. Pointing;Lynda D. Corkum

  • Review of Aquatic Sex Pheromones and Chemical Communication in Anurans

    Rachelle M. Belanger;Lynda D. Corkum

  • Recolonization and possible recovery of burrowing mayflies (Ephemeroptera: Ephemeridae: Hexagenia spp.) in Lake Erie of the Laurentian Great Lakes

    Don W. Schloesser;Kenneth A. Krieger;Jan J. H. Ciborowski;Lynda D. Corkum

  • Assessment of fish size on shelter choice and intraspecific interactions by round gobies Neogobius melanostomus

    Katie L. Stammler;Lynda D. Corkum

  • Distributional patterns of immature Simuliidae (Diptera) in northwestern North America

    Lynda D. Corkum;D. C. Currie

  • Spatial distributional patterns of macroinvertebrates along rivers within and among biomes

    Lynda D. Corkum

  • Effects of emergence date and maternal size on egg development and sizes of eggs and first-instar nymphs of a semelparous aquatic insect.

    Lynda D. Corkum;Jan J. H. Ciborowski;Ray G. Poulin

  • Spatial Patterns of Macroinvertebrate Distributions along Rivers in Eastern Deciduous Forest and Grassland Biomes

    Lynda D. Corkum

  • Assemblage Structure of Freshwater Mussels (Bivalvia:Unionidae) in Rivers with Grassy and Forested Riparian Zones

    Todd J. Morris;Lynda D. Corkum

  • Aquatic to terrestrial transfer of sediment associated persistent organic pollutants is enhanced by bioamplification processes.

    Jennifer M. Daley;Lynda D. Corkum;Ken G. Drouillard

  • The influence of current velocity and substrate on the distribution and drift of two species of mayflies (Ephemeroptera)

    Lynda D. Corkum;P. J. Pointing;Jan J. H. Ciborowski

  • Organic Contaminants in Adult Aquatic Insects of the St. Clair and Detroit Rivers, Ontario, Canada

    Jan J.H. Ciborowski;Lynda D. Corkum

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicholas E. Mandrak
Nicholas E. Mandrak University of Toronto
Jan J. H. Ciborowski
Jan J. H. Ciborowski University of Windsor
Stéphanie M. Doucet
Stéphanie M. Doucet University of Windsor
Timothy B. Johnson
Timothy B. Johnson Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry
Daniel D. Heath
Daniel D. Heath University of Windsor
David J. Jude
David J. Jude University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ken G. Drouillard
Ken G. Drouillard University of Windsor
Hugh J. MacIsaac
Hugh J. MacIsaac University of Windsor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career paths aimed at tackling today’s ecological challenges. For those interested in expanding their expertise, exploring online dsw programs in social work can be a meaningful complement, especially for roles involving community engagement and environmental justice.

Students seeking flexibility might consider an accredited affordable online general studies degree as a stepping stone, allowing them to customize their curriculum to fit environmental interests alongside other disciplines.

For those new to higher education or looking for a more straightforward academic path, some of the easiest bachelors degree options may provide a manageable start while still preparing students for environmental careers.

Specialized knowledge in earth systems is vital, and programs offering the best online geology degree combine foundational science with practical applications, ideal for those focused on environmental monitoring, conservation, and resource management.

Best Scientists Citing Lynda D. Corkum

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles