World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
30
Citations
3760
World Ranking
8340
National Ranking
2757

Edward F. Roseman publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward F. Roseman sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 136 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Edward F. Roseman D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward F. Roseman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edward F. Roseman is affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Environmental Science, with a notable focus on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Water Science and Technology, Global and Planetary Change, and Aquatic Science as significant subfields of study.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics related to Fish Ecology and Management Studies, which account for the majority of their publications. Other key topics include Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior, Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes, Marine and Fisheries Research, Fish Biology and Ecology Studies, Water Quality and Resources Studies, and Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies.

Frequent publication venues for Edward F. Roseman include:

  • Journal of Great Lakes Research
  • Advances in Limnology
  • North American Journal of Fisheries Management
  • Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management
  • Water

Notable coauthors who have frequently collaborated with Roseman are:

  • Robin L. DeBruyne
  • James C. Boase
  • Jason L. Fischer
  • Christine M. Mayer
  • Justin A. Chiotti

Recent publications illustrate the breadth of their research in aquatic ecosystems and fish habitat studies:

  • Contemporary spatial extent and environmental drivers of larval coregonine distributions across Lake Ontario, 2021, Journal of Great Lakes Research
  • Genetic Family Reconstruction Characterizes Lake Sturgeon Use of Newly Constructed Spawning Habitat and Larval Dispersal, 2020, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
  • If you build it and they come, will they stay? Maturation of constructed fish spawning reefs in the St. Clair-Detroit River System, 2020, Ecological Engineering
  • Review of Methods to Repair and Maintain Lithophilic Fish Spawning Habitat, 2020, Water
  • Predicting physical and geomorphic habitat associated with historical lake whitefish and cisco spawning locations in Lakes Erie and Ontario, 2022, Journal of Great Lakes Research

Best Publications

  • Colonization, Ecology, and Population Structure of the "Quagga'' Mussel (Bivalvia: Dreissenidae) in the Lower Great Lakes

    Edward L. Mills;Ron M. Dermott;Edward F. Roseman;Donna Dustin

  • Deepwater demersal fish community collapse in Lake Huron

    Stephen C. Riley;Edward F. Roseman;S. Jerrine Nichols;Timothy P. O'Brien

  • Changes in the Dreissenid Community in the Lower Great Lakes with Emphasis on Southern Lake Ontario

    Edward L. Mills;Jana R. Chrisman;Brad Baldwin;Randall W. Owens

  • Adverse Effects of Alewives on Laurentian Great Lakes Fish Communities

    Charles P. Madenjian;Robert O'Gorman;David B. Bunnell;Ray L. Argyle

  • RESTORING PISCIVOROUS FISH POPULATIONS IN THE LAURENTIAN GREAT LAKES CAUSES SEABIRD DIETARY CHANGE

    Craig E. Hebert;D. V. Chip Weseloh;Abde Idrissi;Michael T. Arts

  • Planktivory in the changing Lake Huron zooplankton community: Bythotrephes consumption exceeds that of Mysis and fish

    David B. Bunnell;Bruce M. Davis;David M. Warner;Margret A. Chriscinske

  • Lake sturgeon response to a spawning reef constructed in the Detroit river.

    Edward F. Roseman;B. Manny;J. Boase;M. Child

  • Environmental DNA (eDNA): A tool for quantifying the abundant but elusive round goby (Neogobius melanostomus).

    Meredith B. Nevers;Muruleedhara Byappanahalli;Charles C. Morris;Dawn Shively

  • Angler‐Caught Piscivore Diets Reflect Fish Community Changes in Lake Huron

    Edward F. Roseman;Jeffrey S. Schaeffer;Ethan Bright;David G. Fielder

  • A biophysical model of Lake Erie walleye (Sander vitreus) explains interannual variations in recruitment

    Yingming ZhaoY. Zhao;Yingming ZhaoY. Zhao;Yingming ZhaoY. Zhao;Michael L. JonesM.L. Jones;Michael L. JonesM.L. Jones;Michael L. JonesM.L. Jones;Brian J. ShuterB.J. Shuter;Brian J. ShuterB.J. Shuter;Brian J. ShuterB.J. Shuter;Edward F. RosemanE.F. Roseman;Edward F. RosemanE.F. Roseman;Edward F. RosemanE.F. Roseman

  • Predation on Walleye Eggs by Fish on Reefs in Western Lake Erie

    Edward F. Roseman;William W. Taylor;Daniel B. Hayes;Andrew L. Jones

  • Spatial Patterns Emphasize the Importance of Coastal Zones as Nursery Areas for Larval Walleye in Western Lake Erie

    Edward F. Roseman;William W. Taylor;Daniel B. Hayes;Jeffrey T. Tyson

  • Evaluation of competition between age-0 yellow perch (Perca flavescens) and gizzard shad (Dorosoma cepedianum) in Oneida Lake, New York

    E F Roseman;E L Mills;J L Forney;L G Rudstam

  • Mechanisms driving recruitment variability in fish: comparisons between the Laurentian Great Lakes and marine systems

    Jeremy J. Pritt;Edward F. Roseman;Timothy P. O'Brien

  • Portfolio theory as a management tool to guide conservation and restoration of multi‐stock fish populations

    Mark R. DuFour;Cassandra J. May;Edward F. Roseman;Stuart A. Ludsin

  • Planktivory by alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus) and rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax) on microcrustacean zooplankton and dreissenid (Bivalvia: Dreissenidae) veligers in southern Lake Ontario

    Edward L. Mills;Robert O'Gorman;Edward F. Roseman;Connie Adams

  • Divergent migration within lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) populations: Multiple distinct patterns exist across an unrestricted migration corridor.

    Steven T. Kessel;Darryl W. Hondorp;Christopher M. Holbrook;James C. Boase

  • Biomass of deepwater demersal forage fishes in Lake Huron, 1994–2007: Implications for offshore predators

    Edward F. Roseman;Stephen C. Riley

  • Evidence of Lake Whitefish Spawning in the Detroit River: Implications for Habitat and Population Recovery

    Edward F. Roseman;Gregory W. Kennedy;James Boase;Bruce A. Manny

  • A scientific basis for restoring fish spawning habitat in the St. Clair and Detroit Rivers of the Laurentian Great Lakes

    Bruce A. Manny;Edward F. Roseman;Gregory W. Kennedy;James C. Boase

  • Population synchrony of a native fish across three Laurentian Great Lakes: evaluating the effects of dispersal and climate

    David B. Bunnell;Jean V. Adams;Owen T. Gorman;Charles P. Madenjian

Frequent Co-Authors

William W. Taylor
William W. Taylor Michigan State University
Charles P. Madenjian
Charles P. Madenjian United States Geological Survey
Edward L. Mills
Edward L. Mills Cornell University
David B. Bunnell
David B. Bunnell United States Geological Survey
Stuart A. Ludsin
Stuart A. Ludsin The Ohio State University
Tomas O. Höök
Tomas O. Höök Purdue University West Lafayette
Kim T. Scribner
Kim T. Scribner Michigan State University
Michael L. Jones
Michael L. Jones Michigan State University
Charles C. Krueger
Charles C. Krueger Michigan State University
Elizabeth A. Marschall
Elizabeth A. Marschall The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution opens doors to a wide range of interdisciplinary careers in research, education, environmental consulting, and more. Today, flexible learning options allow students to expand their skills and qualifications online, often at an affordable cost. Those interested in combining ecological knowledge with other fields should explore the most affordable online interdisciplinary studies programs, which integrate insights from various academic areas.

For those fascinated by the intersection of history and environmental change, pursuing an online masters in history can provide valuable context for understanding ecological developments over time. Alternatively, careers in information management and education are supported by colleges with library science programs, which teach organization and data stewardship skills increasingly essential in ecological research.

Communication also plays a critical role. Students aiming to work at the intersection of science and human well-being might consider asha approved slp programs online to gain expert knowledge in speech and language pathology. Exploring related online degrees is an excellent way to diversify your expertise and expand your career pathways in the ecological sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Edward F. Roseman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles