World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
46
Citations
7661
World Ranking
4667
National Ranking
1627

Charles C. Krueger publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles C. Krueger sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 179 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Charles C. Krueger D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles C. Krueger sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles C. Krueger is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with an emphasis on ecology, nature and landscape conservation, and global and planetary change. Subfields of study also include aquatic science and water science and technology.

Their work extensively covers topics related to fish ecology and management studies, marine and fisheries research, wildlife ecology and conservation, aquatic invertebrate ecology and behavior, fish biology and ecology studies, hydrology and sediment transport processes, and broader ecology and biodiversity studies.

Frequent collaborative partners include Andrew M. Muir, Charles R. Bronte, Michael J. Hansen, Christopher S. Vandergoot, and Darryl W. Hondorp. These coauthorships indicate a network of research focused on aquatic and fisheries sciences.

Krueger's research has been published predominantly in the Journal of Great Lakes Research, with ten publications in this venue. Other publication venues include the North American Journal of Fisheries Management (four publications), the Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (two publications), Ecological Indicators (two publications), and Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries (one publication).

Recent papers demonstrate a focus on fish behavior, habitat use, and telemetry within freshwater systems, particularly in the Great Lakes region. Selected recent publications include:

  • Seasonal habitat-use differences among Lake Erie's walleye stocks, 2020, Journal of Great Lakes Research
  • Using untapped telemetry data to explore the winter biology of freshwater fish, 2021, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
  • Tributary use and large-scale movements of grass carp in Lake Erie, 2020, Journal of Great Lakes Research
  • Characterization of acoustic detection efficiency using a gliding robotic fish as a mobile receiver platform, 2020, Animal Biotelemetry
  • Overcoming barriers to transfer of scientific knowledge: integrating biotelemetry into fisheries management in the Laurentian Great Lakes, 2020, Socio-Ecological Practice Research

Best Publications

  • Ecological and Genetic Effects of Salmonid Introductions in North America

    C. C. Krueger;B. May

  • Genetic variation at microsatellite loci in sturgeon: primer sequence homology in Acipenser and Scaphirhynchus

    Bernie May;Charles C. Krueger;Harold L. Kincaid

  • ANNUAL PRODUCTION OF MACROINVERTEBRATES IN THREE STREAMS OF DIFFERENT WATER QUALITY

    Charles C. Krueger;Thomas F. Waters

  • From clients to stakeholders: A philosophical shift for fish and wildlife management

    Daniel J. Decker;Charles C. Krueger;Richard A. Baer;Barbara A. Knuth

  • A moving target—incorporating knowledge of the spatial ecology of fish into the assessment and management of freshwater fish populations

    Steven J. Cooke;Eduardo G. Martins;Eduardo G. Martins;Daniel P. Struthers;Lee F. G. Gutowsky

  • Mitochondrial DNA variation among lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) strains stocked into Lake Ontario

    Peter M. Grewe;Charles C. Krueger;Charles F. Aquadro;Eldredge Bermingham

  • Predation by Alewives on Lake Trout Fry in Lake Ontario: Role of an Exotic Species in Preventing Restoration of a Native Species

    Charles C. Krueger;David L. Perkins;Edward L. Mills;J. Ellen Marsden

  • Behavioral Thermoregulation of Brook and Rainbow Trout: Comparison of Summer Habitat Use in an Adirondack River, New York

    Owen E. Baird;Charles C. Krueger

  • Conducting and interpreting fish telemetry studies: considerations for researchers and resource managers

    Jacob W. Brownscombe;Jacob W. Brownscombe;Elodie J. I. Lédée;Graham D. Raby;Daniel P. Struthers

  • Computation of confidence intervals for the size‐frequency (Hynes) method of estimating secondary production1

    Charles C. Krueger;Frank B. Martin

  • An Ecosystem Perspective on Re-establishing Native Deepwater Fishes in the Laurentian Great Lakes

    Mara S. Zimmerman;Charles C. Krueger

  • If Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus is ‘the most diverse vertebrate’, what is the lake charr Salvelinus namaycush?

    Andrew Michael Muir;Michael Jay Hansen;Charles Richard Bronte;Charles Conrad Krueger

  • Acoustic telemetry reveals large-scale migration patterns of walleye in Lake Huron

    Todd A. Hayden;Christopher M. Holbrook;David G. Fielder;Christopher S. Vandergoot

  • Acoustic Telemetry Observation Systems: challenges encountered and overcome in the Laurentian Great Lakes

    Charles C. Krueger;Christopher M. Holbrook;Thomas R. Binder;Christopher S. Vandergoot

  • Review of Genetics of Lake Trout in the Great Lakes: History, Molecular Genetics, Physiology, Strain Comparisons, and Restoration Management

    Charles C. Krueger;Peter E. Ihssen

  • Phenotypic Diversity of Lake Trout in Great Slave Lake: Differences in Morphology, Buoyancy, and Habitat Depth

    Mara S. Zimmerman;Charles C. Krueger;Randy L. Eshenroder

  • Genetic Aspects of Fisheries Rehabilitation Programs

    Charles C. Krueger;Anthony J. Gharrett;Terrence R. Dehring;Fred W. Allendorf

  • Ontogenetic niche shifts and resource partitioning of lake trout morphotypes

    Mara S. ZimmermanM.S. Zimmerman;Stephanie N. SchmidtS.N. Schmidt;Charles C. KruegerC.C. Krueger;M. Jake Vander ZandenM.J. Vander Zanden

  • Evidence of Natural Reproduction by Stocked Lake Trout in Lake Ontario

    J. Ellen Marsden;Charles C. Krueger;Clifford P. Schneider

  • Ecomorphological Diversity of Lake Trout at Isle Royale, Lake Superior

    A. M. Muir;C. R. Bronte;M. S. Zimmerman;H. R. Quinlan

Frequent Co-Authors

Bernie May
Bernie May University of California, Davis
J. Ellen Marsden
J. Ellen Marsden University of Vermont
Charles R. Bronte
Charles R. Bronte United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Steven J. Cooke
Steven J. Cooke Carleton University
William M. Tonn
William M. Tonn University of Alberta
William W. Taylor
William W. Taylor Michigan State University
Charles F. Aquadro
Charles F. Aquadro Cornell University
Paul Bentzen
Paul Bentzen Dalhousie University
Aaron T. Fisk
Aaron T. Fisk University of Windsor
Michael Power
Michael Power University of Waterloo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Whether you are considering a future in Ecology and Evolution or exploring related healthcare roles, online degree pathways in the USA make career switching more accessible. Nurses, for instance, can transition directly from an associate degree via adn to np programs online, fast-tracking them toward advanced roles like nurse practitioners.

With flexible options, such as the fastest rn to bsn program online, registered nurses can quickly earn a bachelor’s degree and open more career doors. Curious about equity and time investment? Investigating how many years does it take to be a nurse practitioner will help you plan your studies and finances.

Career decisions are also influenced by earning potential. Those interested in specialized mental health nursing can compare earning trends by state using current data on pmhnp salary by state. Whether your interests lie in evolving fields like ecology or in fast-growing healthcare careers, online education offers flexible options tailored to your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Charles C. Krueger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles