World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
7450
World Ranking
11068
National Ranking
699

Greg Slabaugh publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Greg Slabaugh sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 168 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Greg Slabaugh D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Greg Slabaugh sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Greg Slabaugh is affiliated with Queen Mary University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields with a primary focus on Computer Science and Medicine. Within these broad areas, their work emphasizes specialized subfields such as Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Artificial Intelligence, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, as well as Media Technology.

The scientist's contributions cover a range of topics primarily related to image processing and machine learning methodologies. Key research topics include advanced image processing techniques, image and signal denoising methods, image enhancement techniques, and broader image processing techniques and applications. They have also explored domain adaptation and few-shot learning, multimodal machine learning applications, and advanced neural network applications.

Several recent papers illustrate the scope of their research. These include:

  • A continual learning survey: Defying forgetting in classification tasks (2021), published in IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
  • DeepFMRI: End-to-end deep learning for functional connectivity and classification of ADHD using fMRI (2020), published in Journal of Neuroscience Methods
  • Learning Frequency Domain Priors for Image Demoireing (2021), published in IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
  • Vector Quantized Semantic Communication System (2023), published in IEEE Wireless Communications Letters
  • FlexHDR: Modeling Alignment and Exposure Uncertainties for Flexible HDR Imaging (2022), published in IEEE Transactions on Image Processing

The publication venues where Greg has frequently contributed reflect interdisciplinary interests and include arXiv (Cornell University), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), European Heart Journal, Heart Rhythm, and IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

Collaboration plays an important role in Greg's research output. Frequent co-authors include Caroline H. Roney, Shanxin Yuan, Steffen E. Petersen, Elisa Rauseo, and Nay Aung.

Best Publications

  • A continual learning survey: Defying forgetting in classification tasks.

    Matthias Delange;Rahaf Aljundi;Marc Masana;Sarah Parisot

  • DAGAN: Deep De-Aliasing Generative Adversarial Networks for Fast Compressed Sensing MRI Reconstruction

    Guang Yang;Simiao Yu;Hao Dong;Greg Slabaugh

  • Shape-Based Computer-Aided Detection of Lung Nodules in Thoracic CT Images

    Xujiong Ye;Xinyu Lin;J. Dehmeshki;G. Slabaugh

  • A survey of methods for volumetric scene reconstruction from photographs

    Greg Slabaugh;Bruce Culbertson;Tom Malzbender;Ron Schafer

  • Graph cuts segmentation using an elliptical shape prior

    G. Slabaugh;G. Unal

  • Reconstructing surfaces by volumetric regularization using radial basis functions

    Huong Quynh Dinh;G. Turk;G. Slabaugh

  • Shape-Driven Segmentation of the Arterial Wall in Intravascular Ultrasound Images

    G. Unal;S. Bucher;S. Carlier;G. Slabaugh

  • Reconstructing surfaces using anisotropic basis functions

    Huong Quynh Dinh;G. Turk;G. Slabaugh

  • DeepFMRI: End-to-end deep learning for functional connectivity and classification of ADHD using fMRI.

    Atif Riaz;Muhammad Asad;Eduardo Alonso;Greg Slabaugh

  • Automatic Segmentation of Polyps in Colonoscopic Narrow-Band Imaging Data

    M. Ganz;Xiaoyun Yang;G. Slabaugh

  • Automatic Detection of Bridge Deck Condition From Ground Penetrating Radar Images

    Z. W. Wang;Mengchu Zhou;G. G. Slabaugh;Jiefu Zhai

  • Fully automatic cervical vertebrae segmentation framework for X-ray images.

    S M Masudur Rahman Al Arif;Karen Knapp;Greg Slabaugh

  • Coupled PDEs for non-rigid registration and segmentation

    G. Unal;G. Slabaugh

  • Wavelet-Based Dual-Branch Network for Image Demoiréing

    Lin Liu;Lin Liu;Jianzhuang Liu;Shanxin Yuan;Gregory G. Slabaugh

  • More Classifiers, Less Forgetting: A Generic Multi-classifier Paradigm for Incremental Learning.

    Yu Liu;Sarah Parisot;Gregory G. Slabaugh;Xu Jia

  • A variational approach to problems in calibration of multiple cameras

    G. Unal;A. Yezzi;S. Soatto;G. Slabaugh

  • Ultrasound-Specific Segmentation via Decorrelation and Statistical Region-Based Active Contours

    G. Slabaugh;G. Unal;Tong Fang;M. Wels

  • Automatic graph cut segmentation of lesions in CT using mean shift superpixels

    Xujiong Ye;Gareth Beddoe;Greg Slabaugh

  • Learning Frequency Domain Priors for Image Demoireing.

    Bolun Zheng;Shanxin Yuan;Chenggang Yan;Xiang Tian

  • Deep fMRI: AN end-to-end deep network for classification of fMRI data

    Atif Riaz;Muhammad Asad;S M Masudur Rahman Al Arif;Eduardo Alonso

  • Deep De-Aliasing for Fast Compressive Sensing MRI

    Simiao Yu;Hao Dong;Guang Yang;Greg G. Slabaugh

Frequent Co-Authors

David J. Hawkes
David J. Hawkes University College London
Steve Halligan
Steve Halligan University College London
Holger R. Roth
Holger R. Roth Nvidia (United States)
David N. Firmin
David N. Firmin National Institutes of Health
Eduardo Alonso
Eduardo Alonso City, University of London
Xiahai Zhuang
Xiahai Zhuang Fudan University
Yike Guo
Yike Guo Hong Kong Baptist University
Sebastien Ourselin
Sebastien Ourselin King's College London
Simon R. Arridge
Simon R. Arridge University College London
Marc Modat
Marc Modat King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and certifications to accelerate your career. Many students opt for quick credentials, and there are several easy licenses and certifications to get that can lead to well-paying IT and tech roles with minimal time investment. These certificates can give you a competitive edge and improve employability in specialized fields.

If you want to fast-track your education, consider one of the fastest online master's degree programs in computer science or related areas. Completing a master’s degree quickly can help you pivot to new career opportunities or qualify for senior positions.

For those thinking long-term, investing in the best masters degree to get can offer strong job prospects and higher salaries. Certain master's programs are in high demand in tech, data science, and cybersecurity.

Alternatively, a foundation in computer science can also begin with an associates degree online, which is both flexible and cost-effective for entry-level roles in IT, programming, and network support.

Best Scientists Citing Greg Slabaugh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles