World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 62 1092 1003 295 258 134 14992

Jack C. Schultz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jack C. Schultz between 1959 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jack C. Schultz published across 67 years, from 1959 to 2025, averaging 2.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 1987. 6 of the 148 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1959 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 1987. 1959: 1 publication 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 2 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 12 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 9 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 7 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 7 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication 2012: 5 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 2 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 5 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 0 publications 2025: 6 publications
1959 2025

148 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jack C. Schultz: publications per year, 1959 to 2025
Year Publications
1959 1
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 1
1974 2
1975 2
1976 2
1977 1
1978 0
1979 1
1980 0
1981 2
1982 3
1983 4
1984 3
1985 1
1986 2
1987 12
1988 8
1989 3
1990 9
1991 1
1992 7
1993 2
1994 2
1995 2
1996 1
1997 3
1998 1
1999 4
2000 3
2001 5
2002 5
2003 1
2004 7
2005 4
2006 2
2007 4
2008 2
2009 0
2010 1
2011 1
2012 5
2013 2
2014 3
2015 1
2016 2
2017 1
2018 1
2019 5
2020 1
2021 2
2022 2
2023 1
2024 0
2025 6
Total 148
Download as CSV

Jack C. Schultz publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack C. Schultz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–135 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 134 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201 134
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Jack C. Schultz D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack C. Schultz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54 62
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Ecology
  • Gene

His primary areas of investigation include Ecology, Botany, Lymantria dispar, Herbivore and Larva. Exclosure is closely connected to Natural selection in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Ecology. Jack C. Schultz performs multidisciplinary study in Botany and Condensed tannin in his work.

His study in Lymantria dispar is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Ecological significance, Tannin, Hybrid poplar, Vascular connectivity and Signalling. Many of his studies involve connections with topics such as Plant defense against herbivory and Herbivore. In Salicaceae, Jack C. Schultz works on issues like Invertase, which are connected to Jasmonic acid.

His most cited work include:

  • Rapid Changes in Tree Leaf Chemistry Induced by Damage: Evidence for Communication Between Plants (441 citations)
  • Oak Leaf Quality Declines in Response to Defoliation by Gypsy Moth Larvae (410 citations)
  • Major signaling pathways modulate Arabidopsis glucosinolate accumulation and response to both phloem-feeding and chewing insects. (361 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Jack C. Schultz focuses on Botany, Ecology, Herbivore, Insect and Plant defense against herbivory. Many of his studies on Botany involve topics that are commonly interrelated, such as Jasmonic acid. His research in Herbivore intersects with topics in Host, Antimicrobial and Resistance.

His work investigates the relationship between Insect and topics such as Arabidopsis thaliana that intersect with problems in Pieris rapae. His work carried out in the field of Plant defense against herbivory brings together such families of science as Hormone and Invertase. The Lymantria dispar study combines topics in areas such as Gypsy moth, Ecological significance, Signalling and Hybrid poplar.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (59.35%)
  • Ecology (30.89%)
  • Herbivore (23.58%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2007-2021)?

  • Botany (59.35%)
  • Insect (19.51%)
  • Arabidopsis thaliana (10.57%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of study are Botany, Insect, Arabidopsis thaliana, Gall and Plant defense against herbivory. His studies deal with areas such as Jasmonic acid and Arabidopsis, Jasmonate as well as Botany. His Jasmonic acid study combines topics in areas such as Lymantria dispar and Invertase.

His research integrates issues of Transcriptome and Bioinformatics in his study of Arabidopsis thaliana. His Plant defense against herbivory research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Hormone, Methyl jasmonate and Ecology, Herbivore. His Herbivore study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Hemlock woolly adelgid, Tsuga, Gypsy moth and Host.

Between 2007 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Flexible resource allocation during plant defense responses. (96 citations)
  • Temporal Changes in Allocation and Partitioning of New Carbon as 11C Elicited by Simulated Herbivory Suggest that Roots Shape Aboveground Responses in Arabidopsis (50 citations)
  • Transcriptional responses of Arabidopsis thaliana to chewing and sucking insect herbivores. (47 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Botany
  • Ecology
  • Gene

Jack C. Schultz mostly deals with Botany, Insect, Phloem, Jasmonate and Arabidopsis thaliana. His study looks at the relationship between Botany and fields such as Arabidopsis, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems. His Insect research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Gall, Vascular cambium, Meristem and Gene expression profiling.

The Phloem study combines topics in areas such as Photosynthesis, Sucrose, Mutant, Elicitor and Carbon dioxide. His research in Jasmonate intersects with topics in Jasmonic acid, Herbivore, Xylem and Transpiration. His Arabidopsis thaliana research focuses on Transcription factor and how it connects with Aphid, Genome and Myzus persicae.

Best Publications

  • Rapid Changes in Tree Leaf Chemistry Induced by Damage: Evidence for Communication Between Plants

    Ian T. Baldwin;Jack C. Schultz

  • Oak Leaf Quality Declines in Response to Defoliation by Gypsy Moth Larvae

    Jack C. Schultz;Ian T. Baldwin

  • The Growth–Defense Trade‐Off And Habitat Specialization By Plants In Amazonian Forests

    Paul V. A. Fine;Paul V. A. Fine;Paul V. A. Fine;Zachariah J. Miller;Italo Mesones;Sebastian Irazuzta

  • Major signaling pathways modulate Arabidopsis glucosinolate accumulation and response to both phloem-feeding and chewing insects.

    Inga Mewis;Heidi M. Appel;Amanda Hom;Ramesh Raina

  • Nitrogen cycling in a northern hardwood forest: Do species matter?

    Gary M. Lovett;Kathleen C. Weathers;Mary A. Arthur;Jack C. Schultz

  • GROWTH RESPONSES OF TROPICAL SHRUBS TO TREEFALL GAP ENVIRONMENTS

    Julie Sloan Denslow;Jack C. Schultz;Peter M. Vitousek;Boyd R. Strain

  • Within‐plant signalling via volatiles overcomes vascular constraints on systemic signalling and primes responses against herbivores

    Christopher J. Frost;Heidi M. Appel;John E. Carlson;Consuelo M. De Moraes

  • Gene expression and glucosinolate accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana in response to generalist and specialist herbivores of different feeding guilds and the role of defense signaling pathways.

    Inga Mewis;James G. Tokuhisa;Jack C. Schultz;Heidi M. Appel

  • Bird predation on forest insects: an exclosure experiment.

    Richard T. Holmes;John C. Schultz;Philip Nothnagle

  • Relationships among defoliation, red oak phenolics, and gypsy moth growth and reproduction

    MaryCarol Rossiter;Jack C. Schultz;Ian T. Baldwin

  • The role of drought stress in provoking outbreaks of phytophagous insects.

    William J. Mattson;Robert A. Haack

  • CHAPTER 3 – Habitat Selection and Foraging Tactics of Caterpillars in Heterogeneous Trees

    Jack C. Schultz

  • Food availability for forest birds: effects of prey distribution and abundance on bird foraging

    Richard T. Holmes;Jack C. Schultz

  • Amino acid nutrition of herbivorous insects and stress to host plants.

    Brent Brodbeck;Donald Strong

  • Flexible resource allocation during plant defense responses.

    Jack C. Schultz;Heidi M. Appel;Abigail P. Ferrieri;Thomas M. Arnold

  • Many Factors Influence the Evolution of Herbivore Diets, But Plant Chemistry is Central

    Jack C. Schultz

  • Fitness costs of jasmonic acid-induced defense in tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum

    Ahnya M. Redman;Donald F. Cipollini;Jack C. Schultz

  • Limitations of Folin assays of foliar phenolics in ecological studies.

    Heidi M. Appel;Heather L. Govenor;Mark D'Ascenzo;Erin Siska

  • SEASONAL AND INDIVIDUAL VARIATION IN LEAF QUALITY OF TWO NORTHERN HARDWOODS TREE SPECIES

    Jack C. Schultz;Philip J. Nothnagle;Ian T. Baldwin

  • Overexpression of CRK13, an Arabidopsis cysteine-rich receptor-like kinase, results in enhanced resistance to Pseudomonas syringae.

    Biswa R. Acharya;Surabhi Raina;Shahina B. Maqbool;Guru Jagadeeswaran

  • Tannin-Insect Interactions

    Jack C. Schultz

  • Induced plant defenses breached? Phytochemical induction protects an herbivore from disease.

    Mark D. Hunter;Jack C. Schultz

  • Arabidopsis GH3-LIKE DEFENSE GENE 1 is required for accumulation of salicylic acid, activation of defense responses and resistance to Pseudomonas syringae.

    Guru Jagadeeswaran;Surabhi Raina;Biswa R. Acharya;Shahina B. Maqbool

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian T. Baldwin
Ian T. Baldwin Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology
Mark D. Hunter
Mark D. Hunter University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Patrick P. Edger
Patrick P. Edger Michigan State University
Marc D. Abrams
Marc D. Abrams Pennsylvania State University
Paul V. A. Fine
Paul V. A. Fine University of California, Berkeley
Steven D. Allison
Steven D. Allison University of California, Irvine
Don Cipollini
Don Cipollini Wright State University
James H. Tumlinson
James H. Tumlinson Pennsylvania State University
Martin J. Lechowicz
Martin J. Lechowicz McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jack C. Schultz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles