World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 56 3954 3842 1880 1813 232 23923

Holger R. Roth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Holger R. Roth between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Holger R. Roth published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2021. 47 of the 276 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2021. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 30 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 36 publications 2022: 27 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 31 publications 2025: 16 publications
1995 2025

276 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Holger R. Roth: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 1
2008 2
2009 2
2010 4
2011 3
2012 5
2013 7
2014 7
2015 9
2016 10
2017 22
2018 19
2019 30
2020 24
2021 36
2022 27
2023 19
2024 31
2025 16
Total 276
Download as CSV

Holger R. Roth publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Holger R. Roth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 232–241 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 232 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423 232
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Holger R. Roth D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Holger R. Roth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458 56
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Holger R. Roth is affiliated with Nvidia in the United States. Their research spans the intersection of computer science and medicine, focusing particularly on the development and application of artificial intelligence in medical imaging and healthcare.

The main fields of study covered in their work include:

  • Computer Science
  • Medicine

Their subfields of study show deep engagement with:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Holger R. Roth's research covers a variety of specialized topics such as:

  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • AI in cancer detection
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Medical Image Segmentation Techniques

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Daguang Xu
  • Dong Yang
  • Ziyue Xu
  • Wenqi Li
  • Andriy Myronenko

Holger R. Roth has contributed extensively to academic literature, with recent papers such as:

  • UNETR: Transformers for 3D Medical Image Segmentation, 2022, 2022 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)
  • Self-Supervised Pre-Training of Swin Transformers for 3D Medical Image Analysis, 2022, 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  • Federated learning for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19, 2021, Nature Medicine
  • Artificial intelligence for the detection of COVID-19 pneumonia on chest CT using multinational datasets, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Generalizing Deep Learning for Medical Image Segmentation to Unseen Domains via Deep Stacked Transformation, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

Key publication venues for their work include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
  • Medical Image Analysis
  • 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  • Abdominal Radiology

Holger R. Roth has also contributed to book publications under Springer Science+Business Media, including titles such as:

  • Domain Adaptation and Representation Transfer, and Distributed and Collaborative Learning, 2020
  • Clinical Image-Based Procedures, Distributed and Collaborative Learning, Artificial Intelligence for Combating COVID-19 and Secure and Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning, 2021

Best Publications

  • Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning

    Hoo-Chang Shin;Holger R. Roth;Mingchen Gao;Le Lu

  • The future of digital health with federated learning

    Nicola Rieke;Nicola Rieke;Jonny Hancox;Wenqi Li;Fausto Milletari

  • UNETR: Transformers for 3D Medical Image Segmentation

    Unknown

  • Swin UNETR: Swin Transformers for Semantic Segmentation of Brain Tumors in MRI Images

    Unknown

  • Self-Supervised Pre-Training of Swin Transformers for 3D Medical Image Analysis

    Unknown

  • DeepOrgan: Multi-level Deep Convolutional Networks for Automated Pancreas Segmentation

    Holger R. Roth;Le Lu;Amal Farag;Hoo-Chang Shin

  • Improving Computer-Aided Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks and Random View Aggregation

    Holger R. Roth;Le Lu;Jiamin Liu;Jianhua Yao

  • Federated learning for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19.

    Ittai Dayan;Holger R. Roth;Aoxiao Zhong;Ahmed Harouni

  • A new 2.5D representation for lymph node detection using random sets of deep convolutional neural network observations.

    Holger R. Roth;Le Lu;Ari Seff;Kevin M. Cherry

  • Artificial intelligence for the detection of COVID-19 pneumonia on chest CT using multinational datasets.

    Stephanie A. Harmon;Thomas H. Sanford;Sheng Xu;Evrim B. Turkbey

  • Generalizing Deep Learning for Medical Image Segmentation to Unseen Domains via Deep Stacked Transformation

    Ling Zhang;Xiaosong Wang;Dong Yang;Thomas Sanford

  • Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Polyp Detection for Colonoscopy: Initial Experience

    Masashi Misawa;Shin-ei Kudo;Yuichi Mori;Tomonari Cho

  • Spatial aggregation of holistically-nested convolutional neural networks for automated pancreas localization and segmentation.

    Holger R. Roth;Le Lu;Nathan Lay;Adam P. Harrison

  • An application of cascaded 3D fully convolutional networks for medical image segmentation.

    Holger R. Roth;Hirohisa Oda;Xiangrong Zhou;Natsuki Shimizu

  • Holistic classification of CT attenuation patterns for interstitial lung diseases via deep convolutional neural networks.

    Mingchen Gao;Ulas Bagci;Le Lu;Aaron Wu

  • Federated semi-supervised learning for COVID region segmentation in chest CT using multi-national data from China, Italy, Japan.

    Dong Yang;Ziyue Xu;Wenqi Li;Andriy Myronenko

  • A New 2.5D Representation for Lymph Node Detection using Random Sets of Deep Convolutional Neural Network Observations

    Holger R. Roth;Le Lu;Ari Seff;Kevin M. Cherry

  • Uncertainty-aware multi-view co-training for semi-supervised medical image segmentation and domain adaptation

    Yingda Xia;Dong Yang;Zhiding Yu;Fengze Liu

  • UNETR: Transformers for 3D Medical Image Segmentation

    Ali Hatamizadeh;Dong Yang;Holger Roth;Daguang Xu

  • Federated learning improves site performance in multicenter deep learning without data sharing.

    Karthik V Sarma;Stephanie Harmon;Thomas Sanford;Holger R Roth

  • Anatomy-specific classification of medical images using deep convolutional nets

    Holger R. Roth;Christopher T. Lee;Hoo-Chang Shin;Ari Seff

  • Deep convolutional networks for pancreas segmentation in CT imaging

    Holger R. Roth;Amal Farag;Le Lu;Evrim B. Turkbey

  • A Bottom-Up Approach for Pancreas Segmentation Using Cascaded Superpixels and (Deep) Image Patch Labeling

    Amal Farag;Le Lu;Holger R. Roth;Jiamin Liu

  • An application of cascaded 3D fully convolutional networks for medical image segmentation

    Holger R. Roth;Hirohisa Oda;Xiangrong Zhou;Natsuki Shimizu

  • Spatial Aggregation of Holistically-Nested Networks for Automated Pancreas Segmentation

    Holger R. Roth;Le Lu;Amal Farag;Andrew Sohn

  • Deep learning to distinguish pancreatic cancer tissue from non-cancerous pancreatic tissue: a retrospective study with cross-racial external validation.

    Kao-Lang Liu;Tinghui Wu;Po-Ting Chen;Yuhsiang M Tsai

Frequent Co-Authors

Kensaku Mori
Kensaku Mori Nagoya University
Daguang Xu
Daguang Xu Nvidia (United Kingdom)
Ziyue Xu
Ziyue Xu Nvidia (United States)
Ronald M. Summers
Ronald M. Summers National Institutes of Health
Le Lu
Le Lu Alibaba Group (China)
David J. Hawkes
David J. Hawkes University College London
Steve Halligan
Steve Halligan University College London
Baris Turkbey
Baris Turkbey National Institutes of Health
Jianhua Yao
Jianhua Yao Tencent (China)
Greg Slabaugh
Greg Slabaugh Queen Mary University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related programs and career tracks can broaden your options after studying Computer Science in the USA. Diverse online degrees can provide flexibility, faster completion times, and access to high-demand job markets.

If you’re considering data science, what is the cheapest data science course in the us? This question is top-of-mind for students balancing quality with affordability. Data science continues to be one of the fastest-growing tech fields, offering exceptional career prospects.

For those interested in engineering, you may want to review the best online electrical engineering programs USA for more interdisciplinary options. These programs blend core engineering skills with computing and open doors to industries such as robotics, telecommunications, and energy.

Not everyone needs a full degree—certain certificate programs that pay well can quickly boost your credentials and earning potential. If speed is a priority, explore the quick masters degrees online to accelerate your education and join the workforce faster.

Best Scientists Citing Holger R. Roth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles