World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
5765
World Ranking
11228
National Ranking
206

Frits H. Post publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frits H. Post sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 140 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Frits H. Post D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frits H. Post sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frits H. Post is affiliated with Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their academic work is associated primarily with this institution, reflecting a connection to a technical and engineering-focused environment.

The data available does not list specific recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues connected with this researcher. Similarly, there are no detailed records of book publications or awards attributed to Frits H. Post.

No specific main fields of study, subfields, or research topics have been documented in the provided information. Therefore, no particular areas of scientific focus can be detailed.

As the available data lacks detailed entries on publications, topics, or collaborations, the profile centers on the known affiliation and the absence of other documented research outputs or accolades.

Best Publications

  • The State of the Art in Flow Visualisation: Feature Extraction and Tracking

    Frits H. Post;Benjamin Vrolijk;Helwig Hauser;Robert S. Laramee

  • The State of the Art in Flow Visualization : Dense and Texture-Based Techniques

    Robert S. Laramee;Helwig Hauser;Helmut Doleisch;Benjamin Vrolijk

  • Over Two Decades of Integration-Based, Geometric Flow Visualization

    Tony McLoughlin;Robert S. Laramee;Ronald Peikert;Frits H. Post

  • Detection, quantification, and tracking of vortices using streamline geometry

    I Ari Sadarjoen;Frits H Post

  • Topology-Based Flow Visualization, The State of the Art

    Robert S. Laramee;Helwig Hauser;Lingxiao Zhao;Frits H. Post

  • Feature Extraction and Visualisation of Flow Fields

    Frits H. Post;Benjamin Vrolijk;Helwig Hauser;Robert S. Laramee

  • Exposure Render : An Interactive Photo-Realistic Volume Rendering Framework

    Thomas Kroes;Frits H. Post;Charl P. Botha;Charl P. Botha

  • Iconic techniques for feature visualization

    Frits H. Post;Frank J. Post;Theo Van Walsum;Deborah Silver

  • Visualization of time-dependent data with feature tracking and event detection

    Freek Reinders;Frits H. Post;Hans J.W. Spoelder

  • Fluid Flow Visualization

    Frits H. Post;Theo van Walsum

  • Three-dimensional display modes for CT colonography: conventional 3D virtual colonoscopy versus unfolded cube projection

    Frans M. Vos;Rogier E. van Gelder;Iwo W. O. Serlie;Jasper Florie

  • Data visualization : the state of the art

    F. H. Post;Gregory M. Nielson;Georges-Pierre Bonneau

  • Selective visualization of vortices in hydrodynamic flows

    Ari Sadarjoen;Frits H. Post;Bing Ma;David C. Banks

  • IntenSelect: using dynamic object rating for assisting 3D object selection

    Gerwin de Haan;Michal Koutek;Frits H. Post

  • Feature extraction and iconic visualization

    T. Van Walsum;F.H. Post;D. Silver;F.J. Post

  • Extensions of Parallel Coordinates for Interactive Exploration of Large Multi-Timepoint Data Sets

    J. Blaas;C.P. Botha;F.H. Post

  • Comparative Visualization - Approaches and Examples

    H.-G. Pagendarm;F.H. Post

  • A statistical approach to the life cycle analysis of cumulus clouds selected in a virtual reality environment

    Thijs Heus;Thijs Heus;Harmen J.J. Jonker;Harry E.A. Van den Akker;Eric J. Griffith

  • A novel approach to quantitative analysis of intravascular optical coherence tomography imaging

    K. Sihan;C. Botha;F. Post;S. de Winter

  • Practicle Tracing Algorithms for 3D Curvilinear Grids

    I. Ari Sadarjoen;Theo van Walsum;Andrea J. S. Him;Frits H. Post

  • Using the Wii Balance Board™ as a low-cost VR interaction device

    Gerwin de Haan;Eric J. Griffith;Frits H. Post

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert S. Laramee
Robert S. Laramee University of Nottingham
William Ribarsky
William Ribarsky University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Jaap Stoker
Jaap Stoker University of Amsterdam
Helwig Hauser
Helwig Hauser University of Bergen
Larry F. Hodges
Larry F. Hodges Clemson University
Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt
Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt Leiden University Medical Center
Clemens W.G.M. Löwik
Clemens W.G.M. Löwik Erasmus University Rotterdam
Lucas J. van Vliet
Lucas J. van Vliet Delft University of Technology
Min Chen
Min Chen University of Oxford
Daniel Weiskopf
Daniel Weiskopf University of Stuttgart

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of educational paths. For those who want to accelerate their education and enter the workforce sooner, the quickest cheapest masters degree programs offer a fast-tracked, budget-friendly option to advance your credentials.

Looking for return on investment? Consider options ranked among the best masters degree to get. These degrees align with current industry needs and can help boost long-term career prospects.

If you’re starting your educational journey or want to build a foundation in technology, associates degrees online provide a flexible and affordable way to gain core skills before transferring to a four-year program or entering the job market.

Cost is a major factor for many students. That’s why enrolling in the cheapest online colleges allows you to access quality programs in Computer Science without breaking the bank.

Best Scientists Citing Frits H. Post

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles