World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
94
Citations
39952
World Ranking
10338
National Ranking
408

Jaap Stoker publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jaap Stoker sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 568 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jaap Stoker D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jaap Stoker sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jaap Stoker is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a focus on surgery, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, oncology, epidemiology, and genetics. Their work spans multiple subfields, reflecting a broad interest in clinical and diagnostic aspects of gastrointestinal diseases and cancer research.

Their research topics notably include:

  • Diverticular Disease and Complications
  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas

Jaap Stoker has published numerous papers in leading journals, with recent notable publications such as:

  • "Imaging alternatives to colonoscopy: CT colonography and colon capsule. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline - Update 2020," 2020, published in Endoscopy
  • "Short-term anti-TNF therapy with surgical closure versus anti-TNF therapy in the treatment of perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease (PISA-II): a patient preference randomised trial," 2022, published in The Lancet. Gastroenterology & Hepatology
  • "Imaging alternatives to colonoscopy: CT colonography and colon capsule. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline - Update 2020," 2020, published in European Radiology
  • "ESGAR consensus statement on the imaging of fistula-in-ano and other causes of anal sepsis," 2020, published in European Radiology
  • "MRI in addition to CT in patients scheduled for local therapy of colorectal liver metastases (CAMINO): an international, multicentre, prospective, diagnostic accuracy trial," 2023, published in The Lancet Oncology

Frequent co-authors contributing to several collaborative publications include:

  • Christianne J. Buskens
  • Marc G. Besselink
  • Geert D'Haens
  • K Gecse
  • Patrick M. Bossuyt

Regarding publication venues, their work often appears in:

  • Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
  • Gastroenterology
  • European Radiology
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Human Reproduction

Jaap Stoker's extensive publication record and collaborations reflect a multidisciplinary approach intersecting imaging technologies, therapeutic strategies, and clinical outcomes in gastrointestinal and oncologic diseases. Their contributions encompass both diagnostic guideline development and clinical trial research within their areas of specialty.

Best Publications

  • Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE): Determining Therapeutic Goals for Treat-to-Target.

    L. Peyrin-Biroulet;W. Sandborn;B. E. Sands;W. Reinisch;W. Reinisch

  • Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review.

    Jeroen C van Rijn;Johannes B Reitsma;Jaap Stoker;Patrick M Bossuyt

  • Rectal Cancer: Local Staging and Assessment of Lymph Node Involvement with Endoluminal US, CT, and MR Imaging—A Meta-Analysis

    Shandra Bipat;Afina S. Glas;Frederik J. M. Slors;Aeilko H. Zwinderman

  • ECCO-ESGAR Guideline for Diagnostic Assessment in IBD Part 1: Initial diagnosis, monitoring of known IBD, detection of complications

    Christian Maaser;Andreas Sturm;Stephan R Vavricka;Torsten Kucharzik

  • Magnetic resonance imaging for clinical management of rectal cancer: Updated recommendations from the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting

    Regina G. H. Beets-Tan;Doenja M. J. Lambregts;Monique Maas;Shandra Bipat

  • Imaging techniques for assessment of inflammatory bowel disease: Joint ECCO and ESGAR evidence-based consensus guidelines

    J. Panes;Y. Bouhnik;W. Reinisch;J. Stoker

  • Diagnostic Imaging of Colorectal Liver Metastases with CT, MR Imaging, FDG PET, and/or FDG PET/CT: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies Including Patients Who Have Not Previously Undergone Treatment

    Maarten Christian Niekel;Shandra Bipat;Jaap Stoker

  • Colorectal Liver Metastases: CT, MR Imaging, and PET for Diagnosis—Meta-analysis

    Shandra Bipat;Maarten S. van Leeuwen;Emile F. I. Comans;Milan E. J. Pijl

  • The diagnostic accuracy of US, CT, MRI and 1H-MRS for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis compared with liver biopsy: a meta-analysis

    Anneloes E. Bohte;Jochem R. van Werven;Shandra Bipat;Jaap Stoker

  • Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: a systematic review

    Shandra Bipat;Afina S Glas;Jacobus van der Velden;Aeilko H Zwinderman

  • Imaging strategies for detection of urgent conditions in patients with acute abdominal pain: diagnostic accuracy study.

    Wytze Laméris;Adrienne van Randen;H Wouter van Es;Johannes P M van Heesewijk

  • Imaging patients with acute abdominal pain.

    Jaap Stoker;Adrienne van Randen;Wytze Laméris;Marja A. Boermeester

  • Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial

    Esther M Stoop;Margriet C de Haan;Thomas R de Wijkerslooth;Patrick M Bossuyt

  • Acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of CT and graded compression US related to prevalence of disease.

    Adrienne van Randen;Shandra Bipat;Aeilko H Zwinderman;Dirk T Ubbink

  • A global consensus on the classification, diagnosis and multidisciplinary treatment of perianal fistulising Crohn's disease

    Krisztina B Gecse;Krisztina B Gecse;Willem Bemelman;Michael A Kamm;Jaap Stoker

  • Assessment of hepatic steatosis in patients undergoing liver resection: comparison of US, CT, T1-weighted dual-echo MR imaging, and point-resolved 1H MR spectroscopy.

    Jochem R van Werven;Hendrik A Marsman;Aart J Nederveen;Nico J Smits

  • Patients Who Undergo Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Restaged by Using Diagnostic MR Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Marije P. van der Paardt;Marjolein B. Zagers;Regina G. H. Beets-Tan;Jaap Stoker

  • Guidelines of Diagnostics and Treatment of Acute Left-Sided Colonic Diverticulitis

    Caroline S. Andeweg;Irene M. Mulder;Richelle J.F. Felt-Bersma;Annelies Verbon

  • Ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis and determining resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis

    Shandra Bipat;Saffire S K S Phoa;Otto M van Delden;Patrick M M Bossuyt

  • Endoscopic Versus Surgical Drainage of the Pancreatic Duct in Chronic Pancreatitis: A Prospective Randomized Trial

    Djuna L. Cahen;Dirk J. Gouma;Yung Nio;Myriam Delhaye

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick M.M. Bossuyt
Patrick M.M. Bossuyt University of Amsterdam
Marja A. Boermeester
Marja A. Boermeester University of Amsterdam
Ernst J. Kuipers
Ernst J. Kuipers Nanyang Technological University
Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf
Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf University of Amsterdam
Lucas J. van Vliet
Lucas J. van Vliet Delft University of Technology
Paul Fockens
Paul Fockens University of Amsterdam
Geert R. D'Haens
Geert R. D'Haens University of Amsterdam
Regina G. H. Beets-Tan
Regina G. H. Beets-Tan Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
Marc A. Benninga
Marc A. Benninga University of Amsterdam
Thomas M. van Gulik
Thomas M. van Gulik University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online medical degrees can open up flexible and diverse career opportunities in healthcare. For those aiming to advance their practice, dnp online programs offer a pathway to the highest level of nursing, allowing professionals to balance study with work commitments.

If you want to enter the workforce quickly, the fastest lpn program can help you gain licensure and start your career in as little time as possible, often with online coursework designed for busy schedules.

Mental health is another growing field—psych np programs prepare nurses for specialized roles as psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners, blending online learning with essential clinical experiences.

For those interested in the business side of healthcare, the cheapest mha programs online provide affordable pathways to leadership and administrative careers. These degrees can be an excellent option for professionals wanting to impact healthcare beyond direct patient care.

Best Scientists Citing Jaap Stoker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles