World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
6568
World Ranking
11550
National Ranking
724

Robert S. Laramee publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert S. Laramee sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 200 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Robert S. Laramee D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert S. Laramee sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert S. Laramee is affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily on the field of computer science, with a strong emphasis on computer vision and pattern recognition as well as artificial intelligence. Other areas of study include sociology and political science, signal processing, and information systems and management.

The main topics covered in their work include data visualization and analytics, video analysis and summarization, data analysis with R, multimedia communication and technology, scientific computing and data management, digital humanities and scholarship, and image retrieval and classification techniques.

Frequent co-authors of Robert S. Laramee include:

  • Elif E. Fırat
  • Qiru Wang
  • Benjamin Bach
  • Alfie Abdul-Rahman
  • Petra Isenberg

They have published extensively in several venues, with regular contributions to:

  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Information Visualization
  • Visual Informatics
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences

Their recent papers include:

  • "Interactive visualization literacy: The state-of-the-art", 2022, Information Visualization
  • "VIS30K: A Collection of Figures and Tables From IEEE Visualization Conference Publications", 2021, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • "Challenges and Opportunities in Data Visualization Education: A Call to Action", 2023, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • "RAMPVIS: Answering the challenges of building visualisation capabilities for large-scale emergency responses", 2022, Epidemics
  • "Visualization for epidemiological modelling: challenges, solutions, reflections and recommendations", 2022, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences

Best Publications

  • The State of the Art in Flow Visualisation: Feature Extraction and Tracking

    Frits H. Post;Benjamin Vrolijk;Helwig Hauser;Robert S. Laramee

  • The State of the Art in Flow Visualization : Dense and Texture-Based Techniques

    Robert S. Laramee;Helwig Hauser;Helmut Doleisch;Benjamin Vrolijk

  • Data, Information, and Knowledge in Visualization

    Min Chen;D. Ebert;H. Hagen;R.S. Laramee

  • Over Two Decades of Integration-Based, Geometric Flow Visualization

    Tony McLoughlin;Robert S. Laramee;Ronald Peikert;Frits H. Post

  • Glyph-based Visualization: Foundations, Design Guidelines, Techniques and Applications

    Rita Borgo;Johannes Kehrer;David H. S. Chung;Eamonn Maguire

  • Topology-Based Flow Visualization, The State of the Art

    Robert S. Laramee;Helwig Hauser;Lingxiao Zhao;Frits H. Post

  • Feature Extraction and Visualisation of Flow Fields

    Frits H. Post;Benjamin Vrolijk;Helwig Hauser;Robert S. Laramee

  • Vector Field Editing and Periodic Orbit Extraction Using Morse Decomposition

    Guoning Chen;K. Mischaikow;R.S. Laramee;P. Pilarczyk

  • Image space based visualization of unsteady flow on surfaces

    R.S. Laramee;B. Jobard;H. Hauser

  • Storytelling and Visualization: An Extended Survey

    Chao Tong;Richard C. Roberts;Rita Borgo;Sean P. Walton

  • Uncertainty Visualization Methods in Isosurface Rendering

    Philip J. Rhodes;Robert S. Laramee;R. Daniel Bergeron;Ted M. Sparr

  • Rivalry and interference with a head-mounted display

    Robert S Laramee;Colin Ware

  • Evenly Spaced Streamlines for Surfaces: An Image-Based Approach

    Benjamin Spencer;Robert S. Laramee;Guoning Chen;Eugene Zhang

  • Investigating Swirl and Tumble Flow with a Comparison of Visualization Techniques

    Robert S. Laramee;Daniel Weiskopf;Jurgen Schneider;Helwig Hauser

  • Efficient Morse Decompositions of Vector Fields

    Guoning Chen;K. Mischaikow;R.S. Laramee;E. Zhang

  • Survey of Surveys SoS - Mapping The Landscape of Survey Papers in Information Visualization

    Liam McNabb;Robert S. Laramee

  • Similarity Measures for Enhancing Interactive Streamline Seeding

    T. McLoughlin;M. W. Jones;R. S. Laramee;R. Malki

  • Visual analysis and exploration of fluid flow in a cooling jacket

    R.S. Laramee;C. Garth;H. Doleisch;J. Schneider

  • Technical Section: Surface-based flow visualization

    Matt Edmunds;Robert S. Laramee;Guoning Chen;Nelson Max

  • Angular Histograms: Frequency-Based Visualizations for Large, High Dimensional Data

    Zhao Geng;ZhenMin Peng;R. S. Laramee;R. Walker

  • Visualization for the Physical Sciences

    Dan R. Lipşa;Robert S. Laramee;Simon J. Cox;Jonathan C. Roberts

Frequent Co-Authors

Helwig Hauser
Helwig Hauser University of Bergen
Min Chen
Min Chen University of Oxford
Frits H. Post
Frits H. Post Delft University of Technology
Michael Sedlmair
Michael Sedlmair University of Stuttgart
Han-Wei Shen
Han-Wei Shen The Ohio State University
Tobias Isenberg
Tobias Isenberg French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Torsten Möller
Torsten Möller University of Vienna
Nelson Max
Nelson Max University of California, Davis
Petra Isenberg
Petra Isenberg French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Sebastiano Battiato
Sebastiano Battiato University of Catania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science online offers flexibility and a range of options, no matter your background. Students seeking more affordable routes can consider cheap online colleges that offer recognized programs without high tuition fees.

Admission requirements vary, and some institutions prioritize accessibility. If you've faced academic challenges, you can find a college that accepts low gpa, giving you the chance to start your studies and build a stronger academic record.

Many learners also explore how studies in related fields might impact their career direction. For example, if you’re interested in sustainability alongside technology, you may ask, what can you do with an environmental studies degree. Environmental science and computer science intersect in emerging career paths like data analysis and environmental modeling.

If you’re aiming to earn your qualification quickly, consider a 2-year computer science degree online. Accelerated programs can help you develop the technical skills you need and enter the workforce faster.

Best Scientists Citing Robert S. Laramee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles