World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Elizabeth A. Williamson publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth A. Williamson sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Elizabeth A. Williamson D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth A. Williamson sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY.

    Elizabeth J Williamson;Alex J Walker;Krishnan Bhaskaran;Seb Bacon

  • Annual high-dose oral vitamin D and falls and fractures in older women: a randomized controlled trial

    Kerrie M. Sanders;Amanda L. Stuart;Elizabeth J. Williamson;Julie A. Simpson

  • Effect of fenofibrate on the need for laser treatment for diabetic retinopathy (FIELD study): a randomised controlled trial

    AC Keech;AC Keech;P Mitchell;PA Summanen;J O'Day

  • Synergy and other interactions in phytomedicines.

    Williamson Em

  • Ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptorgamma and retinoic acid receptor inhibit growth and induce apoptosis of human breast cancer cells in vitro and in BNX mice.

    E Elstner;C Müller;K Koshizuka;E A Williamson

  • Ligand for Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor γ (Troglitazone) Has Potent Antitumor Effect against Human Prostate Cancer Both in Vitro and in Vivo

    T Kubota;K Koshizuka;E A Williamson;H Asou

  • Anaphylaxis fatalities and admissions in Australia

    Woei Kang Liew;Elizabeth Williamson;Mimi L.K. Tang

  • Comparison of Propensity Score Methods and Covariate Adjustment: Evaluation in 4 Cardiovascular Studies.

    Markus C. Elze;John Gregson;Usman Baber;Elizabeth Williamson

  • Ethnic differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related hospitalisation, intensive care unit admission, and death in 17 million adults in England: an observational cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform.

    Rohini Mathur;Christopher T Rentsch;Caroline E Morton;William J Hulme

  • OpenSAFELY: factors associated with COVID-19-related hospital death in the linked electronic health records of 17 million adult NHS patients

    Elizabeth Williamson;Alex J Walker;Krishnan J Bhaskaran

  • A Critical Approach to Evaluating Clinical Efficacy, Adverse Events and Drug Interactions of Herbal Remedies.

    Angelo A. Izzo;Sung Hoon-Kim;Rajan Radhakrishnan;Elizabeth M. Williamson

  • Living risk prediction algorithm (QCOVID) for risk of hospital admission and mortality from coronavirus 19 in adults: national derivation and validation cohort study.

    Ash K Clift;Carol A C Coupland;Ruth H Keogh;Karla Diaz-Ordaz

  • HIV infection and COVID-19 death: a population-based cohort analysis of UK primary care data and linked national death registrations within the OpenSAFELY platform.

    Krishnan Bhaskaran;Christopher T Rentsch;Brian MacKenna;Anna Schultze

  • Cannabinoids in clinical practice.

    Elizabeth M. Williamson;Fred J. Evans

  • Acupuncture for Chronic Knee Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Rana S Hinman;Paul McCrory;Marie V Pirotta;Ian Relf

  • Infection, inflammation, and lung function decline in infants with cystic fibrosis.

    Naveen Pillarisetti;Elizabeth Williamson;Barry Linnane;Billy Skoric

  • Clinical effectiveness of a rehabilitation program integrating exercise, self-management, and active coping strategies for chronic knee pain: a cluster randomized trial.

    Michael Hurley;N.E. Walsh;H.L. Mitchell;T.J. Pimm

  • Major Herbs of Ayurveda

    Elizabeth M. Williamson

  • Phylogenies reveal predictive power of traditional medicine in bioprospecting.

    C. Haris Saslis-Lagoudakis;C. Haris Saslis-Lagoudakis;C. Haris Saslis-Lagoudakis;Vincent Savolainen;Vincent Savolainen;Elizabeth M. Williamson;Félix Forest

  • Trends in use, pharmacology, and clinical applications of emerging herbal nutraceuticals.

    Elizabeth M. Williamson;Xinmin Liu;Angelo A. Izzo

Frequent Co-Authors

Liam Smeeth
Liam Smeeth London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Robert Hromas
Robert Hromas The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Dallas R. English
Dallas R. English University of Melbourne
Graham G. Giles
Graham G. Giles University of Melbourne
Stephen Evans
Stephen Evans University of London
John V. Parry
John V. Parry Government of the United Kingdom
David Evans
David Evans University of Bristol
Andrew Forbes
Andrew Forbes Monash University
Daniel D. Buchanan
Daniel D. Buchanan University of Melbourne
Darryl W. Eyles
Darryl W. Eyles University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in medicine opens the door to several related online degree paths that address the growing demand for healthcare professionals in the USA. For those interested in nursing, it’s important to understand admission requirements. Many prospective nurses ask, do I need to take the TEAS test for LPN? The answer varies by program, so exploring schools with flexible entry requirements can help streamline your journey.

If you are seeking a quicker route into healthcare administration, look into accelerated healthcare programs offered online. These degrees allow students to earn qualifications in a shorter time, providing faster entry into healthcare leadership roles.

Registered nurses interested in higher clinical roles can take advantage of RN to NP bridge programs, which offer a structured path from an associate degree in nursing to a graduate advanced practice certification.

For those drawn to wellness, there are also flexible nutrition degrees online. These programs support careers in dietetics, health education, and more—all with the convenience of distance learning.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth A. Williamson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles