World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
76
Citations
26489
World Ranking
1137
National Ranking
28

Martin F. Pera publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin F. Pera sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 245 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Martin F. Pera D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin F. Pera sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin F. Pera is affiliated with the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research in Australia. Their research spans biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with a focus on molecular biology as a primary subfield. The scientist's work covers several specialized topics, including pluripotent stem cells research, CRISPR and genetic engineering, biomedical ethics and regulation, renal and related cancers, 3D printing in biomedical research, single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, and cancer cells and metastasis.

The scientist has published extensively in various academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Stem Cell Reports
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • Cell stem cell
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cell

Among the recent papers contributed by Martin F. Pera are:

  • "Toward Guidelines for Research on Human Embryo Models Formed from Stem Cells" (2020) in Stem Cell Reports
  • "ISSCR standards for the use of human stem cells in basic research" (2023) in Stem Cell Reports
  • "The exploration of pluripotency space: Charting cell state transitions in peri-implantation development" (2021) in Cell stem cell
  • "The consequences of recurrent genetic and epigenetic variants in human pluripotent stem cells" (2022) in Cell stem cell
  • "An ethical framework for human embryology with embryo models" (2023) in Cell

Collaboration is a significant aspect of Martin F. Pera's work. Frequent co-authors include Tenneille E. Ludwig, Laura G. Reinholdt, Nissim Benvenisty, Christine L. Mummery, and Steven C. Munger. These collaborations reflect interdisciplinary engagement across multiple research topics related to stem cell biology and molecular genetics.

Best Publications

  • Embryonic stem cell lines from human blastocysts: somatic differentiation in vitro.

    Benjamin E. Reubinoff;Martin F. Pera;Chui-Yee Fong;Alan Trounson

  • Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to cardiomyocytes

    Christine Lindsay Mummery;Petrus Adrianus Frederik Maria Doevendans;Leon Gerardus Joseph Tertoolen

  • Neural progenitors from human embryonic stem cells.

    Benjamin E. Reubinoff;Pavel Itsykson;Tikva Turetsky;Martin F. Pera

  • Characterization of human embryonic stem cell lines by the International Stem Cell Initiative

    Oluseun Adewumi;Behrouz Aflatoonian;Lars Ahrlund-Richter;Michal Amit

  • Germline Competent Embryonic Stem Cells Derived from Rat Blastocysts

    Ping Li;Chang Tong;Ruty Mehrian-Shai;Li Jia

  • Human embryonic stem cells

    Martin F Pera;Benjamin E Reubinoff;Alan O Trounson

  • Regulation of human embryonic stem cell differentiation by BMP-2 and its antagonist noggin

    Martin Frederick Pera;Jessica Andrade;Souheir Houssami;Benjamin Reubinoff

  • Stem Cells Derived from Human Fetal Membranes Display Multilineage Differentiation Potential

    Sivakami Ilancheran;Anna Emilia Michalska;Gary S L Peh;Euan Morrison Wallace;Euan Morrison Wallace

  • Screening ethnically diverse human embryonic stem cells identifies a chromosome 20 minimal amplicon conferring growth advantage

    Katherine Amps;Peter W. Andrews;George Anyfantis;Lyle Armstrong

  • Isolation of pluripotent embryonic stem cells from reprogrammed adult mouse somatic cell nuclei.

    Megan J. Munsie;Anna E. Michalska;Carmel M. O’Brien;Alan O. Trounson

  • Transplantation of human embryonic stem cell-derived neural progenitors improves behavioral deficit in Parkinsonian rats.

    Tamir Ben-Hur;Maria Idelson;Hanita Khaner;Martin Frederick Pera

  • Cardiomyocyte differentiation of mouse and human embryonic stem cells

    C. Mummery;D. Ward;C. E. Van Den Brink;S. D. Bird

  • Effective cryopreservation of human embryonic stem cells by the open pulled straw vitrification method.

    B Reubinoff;Martin Frederick Pera;Gabor Vajta;Alan Osborne Trounson

  • Stem Cells: Hype and Reality

    Catherine M. Verfaillie;Martin F. Pera;Peter M. Lansdorp

  • Extrinsic regulation of pluripotent stem cells

    Martin F. Pera;Patrick P. L. Tam;Patrick P. L. Tam

  • Stem cell states, fates, and the rules of attraction.

    Tariq Enver;Martin Pera;Carsten Peterson;Peter W. Andrews

  • Stem cells: The dark side of induced pluripotency

    Martin F. Pera

  • Human embryonic stem cells: prospects for development

    Martin Frederick Pera;Alan O Trounson

  • Derivation of neural precursors from human embryonic stem cells in the presence of noggin.

    Pavel Itsykson;Nili Ilouz;Tikva Turetsky;Ronald S. Goldstein

  • Characterization and Culture of Human Embryonic Stem Cells

    Andrew L Laslett;Adam A Filipczyk;Martin Frederick Pera

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan O Trounson
Alan O Trounson Monash University
Christine L. Mummery
Christine L. Mummery Leiden University Medical Center
Benjamin Reubinoff
Benjamin Reubinoff Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Ernst J. Wolvetang
Ernst J. Wolvetang University of Queensland
Peter W. Andrews
Peter W. Andrews University of Sheffield
Steve Oh
Steve Oh A*STAR - Agency for Science, Technology and Research
Edouard G. Stanley
Edouard G. Stanley University of Melbourne
Qi Zhou
Qi Zhou Chinese Academy of Sciences
Andrew G. Elefanty
Andrew G. Elefanty University of Melbourne
Leendert H. J. Looijenga
Leendert H. J. Looijenga Princess Máxima Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Molecular Biology often opens doors to a range of online degrees and career pathways, especially in the healthcare and research sectors. Many students consider programs that allow flexibility while maintaining high academic standards. Comparing leading online institutions—such as wgu vs chamberlain—helps applicants identify programs that best fit their educational needs and career aspirations.

Professionals seeking career advancement may benefit from online bsn to msn programs, which combine affordability with accredited online coursework. Additionally, for those who prefer nonprofit institutions, exploring the nonprofit online universities can ensure that their education is both reputable and mission-driven.

Students with military backgrounds or active duty service can benefit from enrolling in the best military friendly colleges, which offer unique support services and flexible learning options. Through these pathways, aspiring molecular biologists can find programs tailored to their diverse needs, backgrounds, and career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Martin F. Pera

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles