World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Molecular Biology
UK
2026
Award Badge
Genetics and Molecular Biology
UK
2024

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
127
Citations
86575
World Ranking
201
National Ranking
11

Austin Smith publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Austin Smith sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 298 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Austin Smith D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Austin Smith sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 127 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Molecular Biology in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics and Molecular Biology in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2010 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • 2003 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh
  • 1943 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Austin Smith is affiliated with the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom and conducts research primarily in the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work includes significant contributions to molecular biology, biomedical engineering, cancer research, biophysics, and surgery.

The scientist's research covers a range of specialized topics including pluripotent stem cells research, CRISPR and genetic engineering, single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, renal and related cancers, cancer genomics and diagnostics, 3D printing in biomedical research, as well as cell image analysis techniques.

Among recent publications, notable papers include:

  • Human naive epiblast cells possess unrestricted lineage potential, 2021, Cell Stem Cell
  • Naive stem cell blastocyst model captures human embryo lineage segregation, 2021, Cell Stem Cell
  • Capture of Mouse and Human Stem Cells with Features of Formative Pluripotency, 2020, Cell Stem Cell
  • Clonal fitness inferred from time-series modelling of single-cell cancer genomes, 2021, Nature
  • Single-cell genomic variation induced by mutational processes in cancer, 2022, Nature

The most frequent co-authors collaborating with Austin Smith include Jennifer Nichols, Ge Guo, Giuliano Giuseppe Stirparo, Daniel Spindlow, and Anish Dattani.

Research outputs have appeared in several scientific venues, with the most frequent publication outlets being bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Development, Cell Stem Cell, Stem Cell Reports, and Nature.

Austin Smith has been recognized with several professional honors, including being named a Member of Academia Europaea in 2010, a Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh in 2003, and a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) since 1943.

Best Publications

  • Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells.

    Hitoshi Niwa;Jun-ichi Miyazaki;Austin G. Smith

  • Formation of Pluripotent Stem Cells in the Mammalian Embryo Depends on the POU Transcription Factor Oct4

    Jennifer Nichols;Branko Zevnik;Konstantinos Anastassiadis;Hitoshi Niwa

  • FUNCTIONAL EXPRESSION CLONING OF NANOG, A PLURIPOTENCY SUSTAINING FACTOR IN EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS

    Ian Chambers;Douglas Colby;Morag Robertson;Jennifer Nichols

  • The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal

    Qi-Long Ying;Jason Wray;Jennifer Nichols;Laura Batlle-Morera

  • BMP Induction of Id Proteins Suppresses Differentiation and Sustains Embryonic Stem Cell Self-Renewal in Collaboration with STAT3

    Qi Long Ying;Jennifer Nichols;Ian Chambers;Austin Smith

  • Inhibition of pluripotential embryonic stem cell differentiation by purified polypeptides

    Austin G. Smith;John K. Heath;Deborah D. Donaldson;Gordon G. Wong

  • Changing potency by spontaneous fusion

    Qi-Long Ying;Jennifer Nichols;Edward P Evans;Austin G Smith

  • Naive and primed pluripotent states.

    Jennifer Nichols;Austin Smith;Austin Smith

  • Self-renewal of pluripotent embryonic stem cells is mediated via activation of STAT3

    Hitoshi Niwa;Tom Burdon;Ian Chambers;Austin G Smith

  • Embryo-derived stem cells: of mice and men.

    Austin G. Smith

  • Conversion of embryonic stem cells into neuroectodermal precursors in adherent monoculture.

    Qi-Long Ying;Marios Stavridis;Dean Griffiths;Meng Li

  • Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development.

    Ian Chambers;Jose Silva;Douglas Colby;Jennifer Nichols;Jennifer Nichols

  • Altered immune responses in mice lacking inducible nitric oxide synthase

    Xiao-Qing Wei;Ian G. Charles;Austin Smith;Jan Ure

  • Nanog is the gateway to the pluripotent ground state.

    Jose Silva;Jose Silva;Jennifer Nichols;Jennifer Nichols;Thorold W. Theunissen;Thorold W. Theunissen;Ge Guo;Ge Guo

  • Glioma stem cell lines expanded in adherent culture have tumor-specific phenotypes and are suitable for chemical and genetic screens.

    Steven M. Pollard;Koichi Yoshikawa;Ian D. Clarke;Davide Danovi

  • Niche-independent symmetrical self-renewal of a mammalian tissue stem cell.

    Luciano Conti;Steven M Pollard;Thorsten Gorba;Erika Reitano

  • Promotion of Reprogramming to Ground State Pluripotency by Signal Inhibition

    José Teodoro Silva;Ornella Barrandon;Ornella Barrandon;Jennifer Nichols;Jennifer Nichols;Jitsutaro Kawaguchi;Jitsutaro Kawaguchi

  • Capture of Authentic Embryonic Stem Cells from Rat Blastocysts

    Mia Buehr;Stephen Meek;Kate Blair;Kate Blair;Jian Yang;Jian Yang

  • Signalling, cell cycle and pluripotency in embryonic stem cells

    Tom Burdon;Austin Smith;Pierre Savatier

  • Resetting Transcription Factor Control Circuitry toward Ground-State Pluripotency in Human

    Yasuhiro Takashima;Ge Guo;Remco Loos;Jennifer Nichols

Frequent Co-Authors

Jennifer Nichols
Jennifer Nichols University of Cambridge
Ian Chambers
Ian Chambers University of Edinburgh
Paul Bertone
Paul Bertone University of Cambridge
Steven M. Pollard
Steven M. Pollard University of Edinburgh
Wolf Reik
Wolf Reik Babraham Institute
Heino Falcke
Heino Falcke Radboud University
Luis A. Anchordoqui
Luis A. Anchordoqui City University of New York
H. M. Spinka
H. M. Spinka Argonne National Laboratory
Thomas Rauscher
Thomas Rauscher University of Basel
Maria-Teresa Dova
Maria-Teresa Dova National University of La Plata

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Molecular Biology in the USA can open doors to numerous career opportunities and further education options. For those interested in broadening their expertise, pursuing degrees online offers both flexibility and specialization. Many students consider related fields, such as earning a human services degree online, which provides a strong foundation for careers supporting individuals and communities.

Science communication or education backgrounds can lead to interesting transitions. Professionals looking to pivot from the classroom to clinical roles can explore resources on how to make a career change from teacher to speech pathologist, a path that utilizes biological and communication sciences.

For those with an analytical mindset, a math degree online can complement bioinformatics or data-driven research careers. Alternatively, if you’re intrigued by the structure and design aspect of biology, exploring an architect online degree could provide a creative outlet and open alternative career pathways.

Whether you hope to advance within Molecular Biology or transition to a related field, the flexibility of online degree programs allows you to tailor your education to meet your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Austin Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles