World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
11174
World Ranking
8635
National Ranking
3702

Brian R. Meyers publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian R. Meyers sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 90 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Brian R. Meyers D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian R. Meyers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brian R. Meyers is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States. The primary focus of their work is situated within this corporate environment, contributing to research and development activities aligned with the organization's objectives.

Details regarding recent published papers, co-authors, and frequent publication venues are not available for this scientist. Likewise, there are no listed book publications or specific fields and subfields of study attributed to their scholarly output in the accessible data.

There is no information on main topics of scientific work or awards received. The absence of these details limits the overview of their research impact and contributions across academic or applied domains.

This profile reflects the currently available factual data linked to Brian R. Meyers, emphasizing the affiliation and the lack of publicly documented scholarly outputs or recognitions.

Best Publications

  • Wallflower: principles and practice of background maintenance

    K. Toyama;J. Krumm;B. Brumitt;B. Meyers

  • EasyLiving: Technologies for Intelligent Environments

    Barry Brumitt;Brian Meyers;John Krumm;Amanda Kern

  • Multi-camera multi-person tracking for EasyLiving

    J. Krumm;S. Harris;B. Meyers;B. Brumitt

  • PreHeat: controlling home heating using occupancy prediction

    James Scott;A.J. Bernheim Brush;John Krumm;Brian Meyers

  • Toward Characterizing the Productivity Benefits of Very Large Displays

    Mary Czerwinski;Greg Smith;Tim Regan;Brian Meyers

  • System and method for managing software applications in a graphical user interface

    Mary Czerwinski;Greg Smith;Brian Meyers;Patrick Markus Baudisch

  • The large-display user experience

    G. Robertson;M. Czerwinski;P. Baudisch;B. Meyers

  • WinCuts: manipulating arbitrary window regions for more effective use of screen space

    Desney S. Tan;Brian Meyers;Mary Czerwinski

  • Detection and estimation of pointing gestures in dense disparity maps

    N. Jojic;B. Brumitt;B. Meyers;S. Harris

  • Display space usage and window management operation comparisons between single monitor and multiple monitor users

    Dugald Ralph Hutchings;Greg Smith;Brian Meyers;Mary Czerwinski

  • Activity-centric adaptive user interface

    Steven W. Macbeth;Roland L. Fernandez;Brian R. Meyers;Desney S. Tan

  • GroupBar: The TaskBar Evolved

    Greg Smith;Patrick Baudisch;George Robertson;Mary Czerwinski

  • Working Overtime: Patterns of Smartphone and PC Usage in the Day of an Information Worker

    Amy K. Karlson;Brian R. Meyers;Andy Jacobs;Paul Johns

  • Personalized news feed based on peer and personal activity

    George Perantatos;John Wana;Ilya Tumanov;Brian R. Meyers

  • FacetMap: A Scalable Search and Browse Visualization

    G. Smith;M. Czerwinski;B.Robbins. Meyers;G. Robertson

  • Large display research overview

    Mary Czerwinski;George Robertson;Brian Meyers;Greg Smith

  • Scalable Fabric: flexible task management

    George Robertson;Eric Horvitz;Mary Czerwinski;Patrick Baudisch

  • Dynamic thumbnails for document navigation

    Robert DeLine;Mary Czerwinski;Brian R. Meyers;Gina Venolia

  • Mobile taskflow in context: a screenshot study of smartphone usage

    Amy K. Karlson;Shamsi T. Iqbal;Brian Meyers;Gonzalo Ramos

  • Occupancy prediction using historical occupancy patterns

    John Charles Krumm;James W. Scott;Alice Jane Bernheim Brush;Brian R. Meyers

Frequent Co-Authors

Mary Czerwinski
Mary Czerwinski Microsoft (United States)
George G. Robertson
George G. Robertson Microsoft (United States)
Desney S. Tan
Desney S. Tan Microsoft (United States)
Daniel C. Robbins
Daniel C. Robbins Microsoft (United States)
Patrick Baudisch
Patrick Baudisch Hasso Plattner Institute
Nuria Oliver
Nuria Oliver European Laboratory for Learning and Intelligent Systems
John Krumm
John Krumm Microsoft (United States)
A. J. Bernheim Brush
A. J. Bernheim Brush Microsoft (United States)
James Scott
James Scott Microsoft (United States)
Steven M. Drucker
Steven M. Drucker Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online associate degree programs in computer science is a great starting point for students who want to enter the tech workforce quickly. These flexible, two-year programs teach foundational IT and coding skills while offering a convenient, accessible format for remote learners.

For those aiming higher, choosing which master's degree is most in demand in USA can lead to rewarding career opportunities. Master’s programs in artificial intelligence, data science, and cybersecurity are especially sought after by employers and can be completed online at many reputable institutions.

Cost is a significant consideration for many students. It’s worth researching the most affordable online colleges to ensure your education is both budget-friendly and accredited, helping you minimize debt while maximizing career prospects.

Admission requirements vary, and not all schools require high GPAs. Some of the online colleges that accept 2.0 gpa make higher education in computer science accessible to more students who are ready to pursue a tech career.

Best Scientists Citing Brian R. Meyers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles