World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Imran Chaudhri

Imran Chaudhri

Award Badge
Computer Science
USA
2023

Imran Chaudhri publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Imran Chaudhri between 2000 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Imran Chaudhri published across 22 years, from 2000 to 2021, averaging 19 papers a year. Output peaked at 61 publications in 2007. 14 of the 419 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 61. Peak 61 publications in 2007. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 26 publications 2006: 41 publications 2007: 61 publications 2008: 34 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 39 publications 2015: 57 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 3 publications
2000 2021

419 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Imran Chaudhri: publications per year, 2000 to 2021
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 2
2005 26
2006 41
2007 61
2008 34
2009 9
2010 14
2011 8
2012 12
2013 21
2014 39
2015 57
2016 29
2017 20
2018 17
2019 13
2020 11
2021 3
Total 419
Download as CSV

Imran Chaudhri publications per year - data summary

  • Imran Chaudhri, a Computer Science scholar from Humane Inc., has 419 publications recorded across 22 years, from 2000 to 2021.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2000 and the most recent to 2021.
  • The most productive year is 2007, with 61 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2000 and 2003, with 1 publication each.
  • 2 of the 22 years in the span carry no publications at all (2001 and 2002).
  • The rate of publication averages 19.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 20.9 per year counting only the 20 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2017-2021) hold 64 publications, 15% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2000-2007: 132 publications (16.5 per year); 2008-2015: 194 publications (24.3 per year); 2016-2021: 93 publications (15.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is broadly steady.

Imran Chaudhri publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Imran Chaudhri sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Imran Chaudhri publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Imran Chaudhri D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Imran Chaudhri sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Imran Chaudhri D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in United States Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Operating system
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Graphical user interface

His primary areas of study are Human–computer interaction, Graphical user interface, User interface, Computer graphics and Gesture. In the field of Human–computer interaction, his study on 10-foot user interface overlaps with subjects such as Layer. His Graphical user interface study combines topics in areas such as Simulation, Embedded system and Current.

His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Mode, Shell and Interface. In his study, Vertical bar is strongly linked to Electronic document, which falls under the umbrella field of Computer graphics. Artificial intelligence and Computer vision are inherently bound to his Gesture studies.

His most cited work include:

  • Gestures for touch sensitive input devices (2545 citations)
  • Touch screen device, method, and graphical user interface for determining commands by applying heuristics (2124 citations)
  • Unlocking a device by performing gestures on an unlock image (1402 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns User interface, Human–computer interaction, Graphical user interface, Computer graphics and Gesture. The concepts of his User interface study are interwoven with issues in Object, Multimedia, Interface and Mode. His work on 10-foot user interface, User interface design and Affordance as part of general Human–computer interaction research is often related to Layer, thus linking different fields of science.

His study in Simulation extends to Graphical user interface with its themes. His study in the fields of Scrolling under the domain of Computer graphics overlaps with other disciplines such as Icon. As part of his research on Gesture, studies on Computer vision and Artificial intelligence are part of the effort.

He most often published in these fields:

  • User interface (41.25%)
  • Human–computer interaction (28.19%)
  • Graphical user interface (27.60%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2020)?

  • User interface (41.25%)
  • Human–computer interaction (28.19%)
  • Gesture (17.21%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His scientific interests lie mostly in User interface, Human–computer interaction, Gesture, Interface and Computer vision. His study in User interface is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Object, Acknowledgement, Multimedia and Computer hardware. Imran Chaudhri has researched Human–computer interaction in several fields, including Variety and Graphical user interface.

He has included themes like Electrical engineering and Display device in his Graphical user interface study. His Gesture research integrates issues from Computer graphics, Scrolling and SwIPe. His Computer vision research incorporates themes from Sensory cue and Artificial intelligence.

Between 2016 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Polling extension application for interacting with a messaging application (10 citations)
  • Handwriting keyboard for screens (8 citations)
  • Message extension app store (7 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Operating system
  • Artificial intelligence
  • The Internet

Imran Chaudhri spends much of his time researching User interface, Gesture, Computer graphics, Human–computer interaction and Graphical user interface. The various areas that Imran Chaudhri examines in his User interface study include Acknowledgement, Computer hardware, Touchpad and Port. His Computer hardware research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Interface and Realization.

Imran Chaudhri interconnects Mode and Home screen in the investigation of issues within Computer graphics. His Home screen research includes elements of Representation, Artificial intelligence and Computer vision. In general Human–computer interaction, his work in Affordance is often linked to Group, Electronic communication, Duration and User input linking many areas of study.

Best Publications

  • Gestures for touch sensitive input devices

    Steve Hotelling;Joshua A. Strickon;Brian Q. Huppi;Imran Chaudhri

  • Touch screen device, method, and graphical user interface for determining commands by applying heuristics

    Steven P. Jobs;Scott Forstall;Greg Christie;Stephen O. Lemay

  • Unlocking a device by performing gestures on an unlock image

    Imran Chaudhri;Bas Ording;Freddy Allen Anzures;Marcel van Os

  • Mode-based graphical user interfaces for touch sensitive input devices

    Steve Peter Hotelling;Joshua Strickon;Brian Q. Huppi;Duncan Robert Kerr

  • Proximity detector in handheld device

    Steve P. Hotelling;Brian Q. Huppi;Joshua A. Strickon;Duncan Robert Kerr

  • Methods And Systems For Managing Data

    Yan Arrouye;Dominic Glampaolo;Bas Ording;Gregory Christie

  • Media player with imaged based browsing

    Imran Chaudhri

  • Portable electronic device with interface reconfiguration mode

    Os Marcel Van;Freddy A. Anzures;Scott Forstall;Greg Christie

  • ARRANGEMENT OF VIRTUAL INPUT DEVICE ONTO TOUCH SCREEN TYPE USER INTERFACE

    Chaudhuri Imuran;Christie Greg;Ording Bas

  • User interface for computer display

    Imran A. Chaudhri;Cesar Carrera;Patricia J. Coleman

  • Portable electronic device with multi-touch input

    Bas Ording;Scott Forstall;Greg Christie;Stephen O. Lemay

  • Device, method, and graphical user interface for manipulating user interfaces based on fingerprint sensor inputs

    Byron B. Han;Matthew E. Shepherd;Imran Chaudhri;Gregory N. Christie

  • Graphical user interface and methods of use thereof in a multimedia player

    Jeffrey L. Robbin;Steve Jobs;Timothy Wasko;Greg Christie

  • Portable electronic device for photo management

    Michael Matas;Gregory N. Christie;Paul D. Marcos;Scott Forstall

  • Device, method, and graphical user interface for managing folders

    Imran Chaudhri

  • Device, method, and graphical user interface for managing concurrently open software applications

    Imran Chaudhri

  • Keyboards for Portable Electronic Devices

    Kenneth Kocienda;Scott Herz;Richard Williamson;Gregory Novick

  • Indication of progress towards satisfaction of a user input condition

    Freddy Allen Anzures;Bas Ording;Imran Chaudhri;Marcel van Os

  • Unified interest layer for user interface

    Imran A. Chaudhri;John Louch;Andrew M. Grignon;Gregory N. Christie

  • Application menu user interface

    Imran A. Chaudhri;Scott Herz;Steven Jobs;Freddy A. Anzures

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen O. Lemay
Stephen O. Lemay Apple (United States)
Scott Forstall
Scott Forstall Apple (United States)
Bas Ording
Bas Ording Apple (United States)
Greg Christie
Greg Christie Apple (United States)
Gregory N. Christie
Gregory N. Christie Apple (United States)
Jonathan P. Ive
Jonathan P. Ive Royal College of Art
Marcel van Os
Marcel van Os Apple (United States)
Patrick L. Coffman
Patrick L. Coffman Apple (United States)
Duncan Robert Kerr
Duncan Robert Kerr Apple (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Computer Science can open the door to a broad range of specialized fields, both technical and interdisciplinary. For those interested in combining IT skills with public service or law enforcement, affordable online criminal justice programs offer a pathway that blends technology with justice administration.

If you’re drawn to numbers and data, a cheap online accounting degree can help you gain essential finance and analytics skills—often entirely online and with flexible schedules. Alternatively, for those looking to advance into higher-level analytics and AI roles, consider investing in a data master online to deepen your expertise and broaden your career options.

You might also be interested in specialized industries like construction or project management. An online degree for construction management blends business, operations, and tech skills, and can accelerate your path into management-level roles in a growing field.

Best Scientists Citing Imran Chaudhri

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles