World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
48
Citations
11015
World Ranking
2668
National Ranking
207

Steven M. Pollard publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven M. Pollard sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 161 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Steven M. Pollard D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven M. Pollard sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steven M. Pollard is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Medicine. Within these domains, they have contributed extensively to subfields such as Molecular Biology, Genetics, Immunology, Cancer Research, and Oncology.

Their work addresses a variety of topics that include:

  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Immune cells in cancer
  • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • RNA Research and Splicing

Steven M. Pollard has published numerous articles, with frequent appearances in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neuro-Oncology
  • Nature Communications
  • Genes & Development
  • Developmental Cell

Some of their recent publications include:

  • "Glioblastomas acquire myeloid-affiliated transcriptional programs via epigenetic immunoediting to elicit immune evasion" (2021) in Cell
  • "From cohorts to molecules: Adverse impacts of endocrine disrupting mixtures" (2022) in Science
  • "LRIG1 is a gatekeeper to exit from quiescence in adult neural stem cells" (2021) in Nature Communications
  • "The white matter is a pro-differentiative niche for glioblastoma" (2021) in Nature Communications
  • "Regional identity of human neural stem cells determines oncogenic responses to histone H3.3 mutants" (2021) in Cell stem cell

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Gillian Morrison
  • Raul Bardini Bressan
  • Vivien Grant
  • Margaret C. Frame
  • Neil O. Carragher

Best Publications

  • Glioma stem cell lines expanded in adherent culture have tumor-specific phenotypes and are suitable for chemical and genetic screens.

    Steven M. Pollard;Koichi Yoshikawa;Ian D. Clarke;Davide Danovi

  • Niche-independent symmetrical self-renewal of a mammalian tissue stem cell.

    Luciano Conti;Steven M Pollard;Thorsten Gorba;Erika Reitano

  • Cohesin‐mediated interactions organize chromosomal domain architecture

    Sevil Sofueva;Eitan Yaffe;Wen-Ching Chan;Dimitra Georgopoulou

  • Nanog promotes transfer of pluripotency after cell fusion.

    José Silva;Ian Chambers;Steven Pollard;Austin Smith;Austin Smith

  • Reprogramming Efficiency Following Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Is Influenced by the Differentiation and Methylation State of the Donor Nucleus

    Robert Blelloch;Robert Blelloch;Zhongde Wang;Alex Meissner;Steven Pollard

  • Adherent Neural Stem (NS) Cells from Fetal and Adult Forebrain

    Steven M. Pollard;Luciano Conti;Yirui Sun;Donato Goffredo

  • Capture of neuroepithelial-like stem cells from pluripotent stem cells provides a versatile system for in vitro production of human neurons

    Anna Falk;Philipp Koch;Jaideep Kesavan;Yasuhiro Takashima

  • Long-term tripotent differentiation capacity of human neural stem (NS) cells in adherent culture

    Yirui Sun;Steven Pollard;Luciano Conti;Mauro Toselli

  • Glioblastomas acquire myeloid-affiliated transcriptional programs via epigenetic immunoediting to elicit immune evasion.

    Ester Gangoso;Benjamin Southgate;Leanne Bradley;Stefanie Rus

  • Zebrafish mutants identify an essential role for laminins in notochord formation

    Michael J Parsons;Steven M Pollard;Leonor Saúde;Benjamin Feldman

  • REST regulates distinct transcriptional networks in embryonic and neural stem cells.

    Rory Johnson;Christina Hui-leng Teh;Galih Kunarso;Kee Yew Wong

  • Genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 Screens Reveal Loss of Redundancy between PKMYT1 and WEE1 in Glioblastoma Stem-like Cells.

    Chad M. Toledo;Chad M. Toledo;Yu Ding;Pia Hoellerbauer;Pia Hoellerbauer;Ryan J. Davis;Ryan J. Davis

  • CD133 (Prominin) negative human neural stem cells are clonogenic and tripotent.

    Yirui Sun;Yirui Sun;Weiqing Kong;Anna Falk;Jin Hu

  • Widespread resetting of DNA methylation in glioblastoma-initiating cells suppresses malignant cellular behavior in a lineage-dependent manner

    Stefan H Stricker;Andrew Feber;Pär G Engström;Helena Carén

  • Tripotential differentiation of adherently expandable neural stem (NS) cells.

    Tamara Glaser;Steven M. Pollard;Austin Smith;Oliver Brüstle

  • Genome-wide RNAi screens in human brain tumor isolates reveal a novel viability requirement for PHF5A

    Christopher G. Hubert;Robert K. Bradley;Yu Ding;Chad M. Toledo

  • mTOR inhibition decreases SOX2-SOX9 mediated glioma stem cell activity and temozolomide resistance.

    Laura Garros-Regulez;Paula Aldaz;Olatz Arrizabalaga;Veronica Moncho-Amor

  • Experimental models and tools to tackle glioblastoma.

    Faye L Robertson;Maria-Angeles Marqués-Torrejón;Gillian M Morrison;Steven M Pollard

  • Elevated FOXG1 and SOX2 in glioblastoma enforces neural stem cell identity through transcriptional control of cell cycle and epigenetic regulators

    Harry Bulstrode;Harry Bulstrode;Ewan Johnstone;Maria Angeles Marques-Torrejon;Maria Angeles Marques-Torrejon;Kirsty M. Ferguson;Kirsty M. Ferguson

  • From Cohorts to Molecules: Adverse Impacts of Endocrine Disrupting Mixtures

    Birgersson L;Borbély G;Caporale N;Germain P

Frequent Co-Authors

Austin Smith
Austin Smith University of Exeter
Paul Bertone
Paul Bertone University of Cambridge
James M. Olson
James M. Olson Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Jeongwu Lee
Jeongwu Lee Case Western Reserve University
Stephan Beck
Stephan Beck University College London
Do-Hyun Nam
Do-Hyun Nam Samsung Medical Center
Jeroen Krijgsveld
Jeroen Krijgsveld German Cancer Research Center
Peter B. Dirks
Peter B. Dirks University of Toronto
Jeffrey J. Delrow
Jeffrey J. Delrow Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Cole Trapnell
Cole Trapnell University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology can open doors to a variety of impactful career routes and interdisciplinary opportunities. Many students interested in biological sciences also consider related fields and alternative pathways that offer flexibility and diverse job prospects through online education.

For those considering a career change, it is worth noting that can a teacher become a speech pathologist provides helpful insights for educators exploring transitions to roles like speech pathology, which often intersect with biology and healthcare.

If you are looking to branch out or complement your biology background, you might explore programs such as naab-accredited online architecture degrees or even creative disciplines, highlighted by resources like online graphic design degree.

Additionally, a strong foundation in analytical skills can be gained through an online degree mathematics, which provides valuable tools for research and data analysis within molecular biology and beyond.

These online degree options provide flexible, accredited pathways for learners aiming to broaden or reroute their scientific careers.

Best Scientists Citing Steven M. Pollard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles