World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 57 3436 3244 412 392 163 8720

Mark I. Rees publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark I. Rees between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark I. Rees published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2010. 5 of the 198 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2010. 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 4 publications
1994 2025

198 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark I. Rees: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 3
1995 2
1996 3
1997 1
1998 4
1999 3
2000 6
2001 5
2002 2
2003 5
2004 2
2005 3
2006 6
2007 11
2008 5
2009 12
2010 20
2011 5
2012 18
2013 13
2014 12
2015 6
2016 4
2017 7
2018 10
2019 6
2020 4
2021 7
2022 5
2023 3
2024 1
2025 4
Total 198
Download as CSV

Mark I. Rees publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark I. Rees sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 155–164 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 163 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188 163
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark I. Rees D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark I. Rees sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179 57
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark I. Rees is affiliated with Swansea University in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily on the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Within these domains, their work spans subfields including Genetics, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Neurology, Molecular Biology, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
  • Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis

Mark I. Rees has contributed to various scientific outlets, frequently publishing in the following venues:

  • The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Epilepsia
  • International Journal for Population Data Science

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Mark I. Rees include:

  • "Incidence, Prevalence, and Health Care Outcomes in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension," 2021, Neurology
  • "Epilepsy, antiepileptic drugs, and the risk of major cardiovascular events," 2021, Epilepsia
  • "Missense variants in the N-terminal domain of the A isoform of FHF2/FGF13 cause an X-linked developmental and epileptic encephalopathy," 2020, The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • "Trait impulsivity in Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy," 2020, Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
  • "Sex-specific disease modifiers in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy," 2022, Scientific Reports

Frequent collaborators include:

  • William Owen Pickrell
  • Arron Lacey
  • Beata Fonferko-Shadrach
  • Robert Powell
  • I. M. S. Sawhney

Best Publications

  • The GDP-GTP Exchange Factor Collybistin: An Essential Determinant of Neuronal Gephyrin Clustering

    Kirsten Harvey;Ian C Duguid;Melissa J. Alldred;Sarah E. Beatty

  • De Novo Mutations in SLC1A2 and CACNA1A Are Important Causes of Epileptic Encephalopathies

    Candace T. Myers;Jacinta M. McMahon;Amy L. Schneider;Slavé Petrovski;Slavé Petrovski

  • Mutations in the gene encoding GlyT2 (SLC6A5) define a presynaptic component of human startle disease.

    Mark I. Rees;Mark I. Rees;Kirsten Harvey;Brian R. Pearce;Seo-Kyung Chung;Seo-Kyung Chung

  • Additional support for schizophrenia linkage on chromosomes 6 and 8: A multicenter study

    Dieter B. Wildenauer;Sibylle G. Schwab;Margot Albus;Joachim Hallmayer

  • Dynamic changes in myelin aberrations and oligodendrocyte generation in chronic amyloidosis in mice and men.

    Gwendolyn Behrendt;Kristin Baer;Annalisa Buffo;Maurice A. Curtis

  • An ovine transgenic Huntington's disease model

    Jessie C. Jacobsen;C. Simon Bawden;Skye R. Rudiger;Clive J. McLaughlan

  • The genetics of hyperekplexia: more than startle!

    Robert J. Harvey;Maya Topf;Kirsten Harvey;Mark I. Rees;Mark I. Rees

  • TUBA1A mutations cause wide spectrum lissencephaly (smooth brain) and suggest that multiple neuronal migration pathways converge on alpha tubulins

    Ravinesh A. Kumar;Daniela T. Pilz;Timothy D. Babatz;Thomas D. Cushion

  • Ultra-rare genetic variation in common epilepsies: a case-control sequencing study.

    Andrew S Allen;Susannah T Bellows;Samuel F Berkovic;Joshua Bridgers

  • Immunohistochemical staining of post-mortem adult human brain sections.

    Henry J Waldvogel;Maurice A Curtis;Maurice A Curtis;Kristin Baer;Mark I Rees

  • Hyperekplexia associated with compound heterozygote mutations in the β-subunit of the human inhibitory glycine receptor (GLRB)

    Mark I. Rees;Trevor M. Lewis;John B. J. Kwok;Geert R. Mortier

  • A Two-Stage Genome Scan for Schizophrenia Susceptibility Genes in 196 Affected Sibling Pairs

    Nigel Melville Williams;M. I. Rees;Peter Alan Holmans;N. Norton

  • Functional variants of antioxidant genes in smokers with COPD and in those with normal lung function

    R P Young;R Hopkins;P N Black;C Eddy

  • Association studies of bipolar disorder at the human serotonin transporter gene (hSERT; 5HTT)

    M. Rees;N. Norton;Ian Richard Jones;F. McCandless

  • Overlapping cortical malformations and mutations in TUBB2B and TUBA1A

    Thomas D. Cushion;William B. Dobyns;Jonathan G. L. Mullins;Neil Stoodley

  • Evidence for recessive as well as dominant forms of startle disease (hyperekplexia) caused by mutations in the alpha 1 subunit of the inhibitory glycine receptor

    Mark I. Rees;Martin Andrew;Sudad Jawad;Michael J. Owen

  • Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Dominant and Recessive GLRA1 Mutations in Hyperekplexia

    Seo-Kyung Chung;Jean-Francois Vanbellinghen;Jonathan G. L. Mullins;Angela Robinson

  • Isoform heterogeneity of the human gephyrin gene (GPHN), binding domains to the glycine receptor, and mutation analysis in hyperekplexia

    Mark I. Rees;Kirsten Harvey;Hamish Ward;Julia H. White

  • Functional variants of antioxidant genes in smokers with COPD and in those with normal lung function: Thorax 2006; published online ahead of print on 7 February 2006 as doi:10.1136/thx.2005.048512

    R. Young;R. Hopkins;P. Black;C. Nel Nee Eddy

  • TUBA1A mutations cause wide spectrum lissencephaly (smooth brain) and suggest that multiple neuronal migration pathways converge

    Ravinesh A. Kumar;Daniela T. Pilz;Timothy D. Babatz;Thomas D. Cushion

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael John Owen
Michael John Owen Cardiff University
Robert J. Harvey
Robert J. Harvey University of the Sunshine Coast
Richard L.M. Faull
Richard L.M. Faull University of Auckland
Russell G. Snell
Russell G. Snell University of Auckland
Anthony G Marson
Anthony G Marson University of Liverpool
Ronan A Lyons
Ronan A Lyons Swansea University
Ingrid E. Scheffer
Ingrid E. Scheffer University of Melbourne
Norman Delanty
Norman Delanty Beaumont Hospital
Peter Holmans
Peter Holmans Cardiff University
Samuel F. Berkovic
Samuel F. Berkovic University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Genetics often explore online degree programs that offer flexibility and diverse career options. One popular pathway is pursuing a role in healthcare administration. For those seeking foundational knowledge in medical management, the best medical billing and coding schools online provide specialized training, often with financial aid available.

Accelerated learning is another key trend, allowing ambitious students to fast-track their education. Choosing from the accelerated programs in America can help you enter the workforce sooner or move rapidly toward advanced roles in genetics and related fields.

Flexibility is essential for many learners, and the best accredited self-paced online colleges allow students to work through material at their own pace—an excellent option for balancing education with work or family commitments.

For students concerned about application costs, there are also free application online colleges to consider. This can be a significant advantage when applying to multiple programs.

Best Scientists Citing Mark I. Rees

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles