World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 77 18244 17139 1654 1583 362 38142

Keith G. Oldroyd publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Keith G. Oldroyd between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Keith G. Oldroyd published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 8.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2020. 14 of the 387 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2020. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 31 publications 2016: 31 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 32 publications 2020: 35 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 4 publications
1980 2025

387 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Keith G. Oldroyd: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 6
1991 1
1992 1
1993 1
1994 1
1995 2
1996 1
1997 1
1998 1
1999 0
2000 1
2001 2
2002 3
2003 1
2004 2
2005 3
2006 2
2007 3
2008 7
2009 11
2010 10
2011 7
2012 20
2013 26
2014 17
2015 31
2016 31
2017 28
2018 29
2019 32
2020 35
2021 29
2022 13
2023 11
2024 10
2025 4
Total 387
Download as CSV

Keith G. Oldroyd publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith G. Oldroyd sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 362 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838 362
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Keith G. Oldroyd D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith G. Oldroyd sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730 77
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Keith G. Oldroyd is affiliated with the Golden Jubilee National Hospital in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant emphasis on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

They have published extensively in the subfields of cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, surgery, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, biomedical engineering, and emergency medicine. Their main topics of work include coronary interventions and diagnostics, cardiac imaging and diagnostics, acute myocardial infarction research, antiplatelet therapy and cardiovascular diseases, cardiovascular function and risk factors, cardiac arrest and resuscitation, and mechanical circulatory support devices.

Their recent papers cover important areas in cardiovascular medicine, including:

  • Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI as Compared with Coronary Bypass Surgery, 2021, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Prevalence of Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, 2021, JAMA Cardiology
  • Ticagrelor With or Without Aspirin After Complex PCI, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Ticagrelor alone vs. ticagrelor plus aspirin following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: TWILIGHT-ACS, 2020, European Heart Journal
  • Post-stenting fractional flow reserve vs coronary angiography for optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (TARGET-FFR), 2021, European Heart Journal

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Colin Berry (34 collaborative works)
  • Margaret McEntegart (25 collaborative works)
  • Hany Eteiba (20 collaborative works)
  • Peter McCartney (19 collaborative works)
  • Richard Good (19 collaborative works)

Keith G. Oldroyd's publications appear regularly in these venues:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (16 publications)
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions (13 publications)
  • European Heart Journal (8 publications)
  • EuroIntervention (6 publications)
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions (5 publications)

Best Publications

  • Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention

    Bernard De Bruyne;Uwe Siebert;Fumiaki Ikeno;Volker Klauss

  • Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease

    Bernard De Bruyne;Bindu Kalesan;Emanuele Barbato;Zsolt Piroth

  • Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: 2-Year Follow-Up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Study

    Nico H.J. Pijls;William F. Fearon;Pim A.L. Tonino;Uwe Siebert;Uwe Siebert

  • Angiographic Versus Functional Severity of Coronary Artery Stenoses in the FAME Study: Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography in Multivessel Evaluation

    Pim A.L. Tonino;William F. Fearon;Bernard De Bruyne;Keith G. Oldroyd

  • Randomized trial of preventive angioplasty in myocardial infarction.

    David S. Wald;Joan K. Morris;Nicholas J. Wald;Alexander J. Chase

  • Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided PCI for Stable Coronary Artery Disease

    Bernard De Bruyne;William F. Fearon;Nico H.J. Pijls;Emanuele Barbato

  • PCI Strategies in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock

    Holger Thiele;Ibrahim Akin;Marcus Sandri;Georg Fuernau

  • Ticagrelor with or without Aspirin in High-Risk Patients after PCI

    Roxana Mehran;Usman Baber;Samin K Sharma;David J Cohen

  • Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.

    Timo Mäkikallio;Niels R Holm;Mitchell Lindsay;Mark S Spence

  • Polymer-free Drug-Coated Coronary Stents in Patients at High Bleeding Risk

    Philip Urban;Ian T Meredith;Alexandre Abizaid;Stuart J Pocock

  • Five-Year Outcomes with PCI Guided by Fractional Flow Reserve

    P. Xaplanteris;S. Fournier;N. H. J. Pijls;W. F. Fearon

  • Ticagrelor plus aspirin for 1 month, followed by ticagrelor monotherapy for 23 months vs aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor for 12 months, followed by aspirin monotherapy for 12 months after implantation of a drug-eluting stent: a multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial

    Pascal Vranckx;Marco Valgimigli;Peter Jüni;Christian Hamm

  • Rescue Angioplasty after Failed Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Anthony H. Gershlick;Amanda Stephens-Lloyd;Sarah Hughes;Keith R. Abrams

  • Randomized Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Diabetic Patients: 1-Year Results of the CARDia (Coronary Artery Revascularization in Diabetes) Trial

    Akhil Kapur;Roger J. Hall;Roger J. Hall;Iqbal S. Malik;Ayesha C. Qureshi

  • Randomized Trial of Simple Versus Complex Drug-Eluting Stenting for Bifurcation Lesions. The British Bifurcation Coronary Study: Old, New, and Evolving Strategies

    David Hildick-Smith;Adam J. de Belder;Nina Cooter;Nicholas P. Curzen

  • Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial

    Lokien X van Nunen;Frederik M Zimmermann;Pim A L Tonino;Emanuele Barbato

  • Stratified Medical Therapy Using Invasive Coronary Function Testing in Angina: The CorMicA Trial

    Thomas J. Ford;Bethany Stanley;Richard Good;Paul Rocchiccioli

  • Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial.

    Daniel J F M Thuijs;A Pieter Kappetein;Patrick W Serruys;Friedrich-Wilhelm Mohr

  • Smoke-free legislation and hospitalizations for acute coronary syndrome

    Jill Pell;Sally Haw;Stuart M Cobbe;David E Newby

  • Prognostic value of the Index of Microcirculatory Resistance measured after primary percutaneous coronary intervention

    William F. Fearon;Adrian F. Low;Andy S. Yong;Ross McGeoch

Frequent Co-Authors

Colin Berry
Colin Berry University of Glasgow
Mark C. Petrie
Mark C. Petrie University of Glasgow
Ian Ford
Ian Ford University of Glasgow
Alex McConnachie
Alex McConnachie University of Glasgow
Naveed Sattar
Naveed Sattar University of Glasgow
Bernard De Bruyne
Bernard De Bruyne Cardiovascular Center Aalst
Paul Welsh
Paul Welsh University of Glasgow
Nico H.J. Pijls
Nico H.J. Pijls Eindhoven University of Technology
William F. Fearon
William F. Fearon Stanford University
John P. Greenwood
John P. Greenwood University of Leeds

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens doors to a broad range of fulfilling pathways, many of which start with flexible online education options. If you're interested in preventive care and wellness, consider nutrition degrees online to gain specialized knowledge in dietetics and health promotion.

For those drawn to healthcare leadership, top cahme accredited mha programs offer advanced management skills essential for hospital and clinic administration roles.

Nursing professionals looking to upskill can find accelerated options via online rn to bsn no clinicals, a convenient way to broaden your practice and credentials without the need for extra clinical hours.

If your goal is to reach the highest levels of clinical practice, dnp programs online enable you to complete your Doctor of Nursing Practice efficiently and flexibly.

These online degrees not only offer convenience and accessibility, but also align with emerging healthcare demands—empowering you to advance your career without putting life on hold.

Best Scientists Citing Keith G. Oldroyd

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles