World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
96
Citations
50781
World Ranking
9487
National Ranking
922

Adrian P. Banning publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adrian P. Banning sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 695 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Adrian P. Banning D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adrian P. Banning sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Adrian P. Banning is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, particularly within cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their scholarly output spans multiple subfields including surgery, radiology and nuclear medicine, epidemiology, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

Their research frequently addresses topics such as cardiac imaging and diagnostics, coronary interventions and diagnostics, acute myocardial infarction research, cardiac valve diseases and treatments, infective endocarditis diagnosis and management, cardiac anesthesia and surgical outcomes, and Takotsubo cardiomyopathy and associated phenomena.

Among their recent published papers are:

  • 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes, 2024, European Heart Journal
  • [2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. The Task Force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)]., 2020, PubMed
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation coronary lesions: the 15th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club, 2021, EuroIntervention
  • The European bifurcation club Left Main Coronary Stent study: a randomized comparison of stepwise provisional vs. systematic dual stenting strategies (EBC MAIN), 2021, European Heart Journal
  • ACTIVATION (PercutAneous Coronary inTervention prIor to transcatheter aortic VAlve implantaTION), 2021, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Frequent co-authors in their research include Giovanni Luigi De Maria, Rafail A. Kotronias, Keith M. Channon, David Hildick-Smith, and Roberto Scarsini.

Adrian P. Banning publishes regularly in the following venues:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
  • European Heart Journal
  • EuroIntervention
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Best Publications

  • 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.

    Sousa-Uva M;Neumann Fj;Ahlsson A;Alfonso F

  • Clinical Features and Outcomes of Takotsubo (Stress) Cardiomyopathy

    Christian Templin;Jelena R. Ghadri;Johanna Diekmann;L. Christian Napp

  • 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.

    Franz-Josef Neumann;Miguel Sousa-Uva;Anders Ahlsson;Fernando Alfonso

  • Randomized study to assess the effectiveness of slow- and moderate-release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary artery lesions

    Antonio Colombo;Janusz Drzewiecki;Adrian Banning;Eberhard Grube

  • Population-based study of event-rate, incidence, case fatality, and mortality for all acute vascular events in all arterial territories (Oxford Vascular Study)

    PM Rothwell;AJ Coull;LE Silver;JF Fairhead

  • Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

    Gregg W. Stone;Joseph F. Sabik;Patrick W. Serruys;Charles A. Simonton

  • Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.

    Timo Mäkikallio;Niels R Holm;Mitchell Lindsay;Mark S Spence

  • Rescue Angioplasty after Failed Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Anthony H. Gershlick;Amanda Stephens-Lloyd;Sarah Hughes;Keith R. Abrams

  • Five-Year Outcomes after PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Disease

    Gregg W. Stone;A. Pieter Kappetein;Joseph F. Sabik;Stuart J. Pocock

  • Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial.

    Daniel J F M Thuijs;A Pieter Kappetein;Patrick W Serruys;Friedrich-Wilhelm Mohr

  • Troponin elevation after percutaneous coronary intervention directly represents the extent of irreversible myocardial injury: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

    Joseph B. Selvanayagam;Italo Porto;Keith Channon;Steffen E. Petersen

  • General anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

    S C Lewis;C P Warlow;A R Bodenham

  • Clinical Efficacy of Polymer-Based Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in the Treatment of Complex, Long Coronary Artery Lesions From a Multicenter, Randomized Trial Support for the Use of Drug-Eluting Stents in Contemporary Clinical Practice

    Keith D. Dawkins;Eberhard Grube;Giulio Guagliumi;Adrian P. Banning

  • Treatment of complex coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes: 5-year results comparing outcomes of bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in the SYNTAX trial

    Arie Pieter Kappetein;Stuart J. Head;Marie-Claude Morice;Adrian P. Banning

  • Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients With Left Main and/or 3-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease Comparison of Outcomes With Cardiac Surgery and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents

    Adrian P. Banning;Stephen Westaby;Marie-Claude Morice;A. Pieter Kappetein

  • Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in the treatment of unprotected left main stenosis: updated 5-year outcomes from the randomised, non-inferiority NOBLE trial

    Niels R Holm;Timo Mäkikallio;M Mitchell Lindsay;Mark S Spence

  • Safety and Effectiveness of Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Stenoses: The Disrupt CAD II Study.

    Ziad A. Ali;Holger Nef;Javier Escaned;Nikos Werner

  • Cardiovascular magnetic resonance by non contrast T1-mapping allows assessment of severity of injury in acute myocardial infarction

    Erica Dall'Armellina;Stefan K Piechnik;Vanessa M Ferreira;Quang Le Si

  • Long-Term Prognosis of Patients With Takotsubo Syndrome

    Jelena R. Ghadri;Ken Kato;Victoria L. Cammann;Sebastiano Gili

  • [2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. The Task Force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)].

    Franz-Josef Neumann;Miguel Sousa-Uva;Anders Ahlsson;Fernando Alfonso

Frequent Co-Authors

Keith M. Channon
Keith M. Channon University of Oxford
Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Stefan Neubauer
Stefan Neubauer University of Oxford
Gregg W. Stone
Gregg W. Stone Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Joseph F. Sabik
Joseph F. Sabik University Hospitals of Cleveland
David P. Taggart
David P. Taggart University of Oxford
Thomas F. Lüscher
Thomas F. Lüscher University of Zurich
David E. Kandzari
David E. Kandzari Piedmont Atlanta Hospital
Javier Escaned
Javier Escaned Hospital Clínico San Carlos
Manel Sabaté
Manel Sabaté University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative healthcare degrees and career pathways can expand your options in the medical field beyond traditional MD programs. Online education has opened doors for students to access accredited, flexible, and affordable programs tailored to diverse healthcare interests.

For those drawn to leadership roles, healthcare administration degrees online provide the skills to manage hospitals, clinics, or public health organizations. Students seeking advanced expertise may consider the cheapest mha online programs to pursue a Master’s in Healthcare Administration at a fraction of traditional costs.

Nurses aiming for top clinical positions can accelerate their careers with a 1 year dnp program online. These fast-tracked Doctor of Nursing Practice programs focus on executive and clinical leadership, ideal for practitioners prepared to lead change in healthcare.

Those with an interest in pharmaceuticals can pursue pharmacy school online to obtain a Doctor of Pharmacy. Online pharmacy programs offer flexibility for working professionals and provide a pathway to high-demand, patient-centered careers.

Each of these online degrees can enhance your career possibilities in healthcare, supporting a range of interests and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Adrian P. Banning

Trending Scientists