World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nancy G. Saravia

Nancy G. Saravia

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
54
Citations
9753
World Ranking
15699
National Ranking
6542

Nancy G. Saravia publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nancy G. Saravia sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 126 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Nancy G. Saravia D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nancy G. Saravia sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - ASM Moselio Schaechter Award in Recognition of a Developing-Country Microbiologist, American Society for Microbiology

Overview

Nancy G. Saravia is affiliated with Tulane University in the United States, with a research focus primarily in Medicine. Their work spans various subfields including Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, Parasitology, Rheumatology, and Insect Science.

The main research topics addressed by Nancy G. Saravia include:

  • Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
  • Trypanosoma species research and implications
  • Parasites and Host Interactions
  • Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
  • Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes
  • Synthesis and Biological Evaluation
  • Insect and Pesticide Research

Their recent publications cover a range of issues primarily related to infectious diseases, tropical medicine, and global health. Notable papers include:

  • Social innovation in global health: sparking location action, 2020, published in The Lancet Global Health
  • Cutaneous leishmaniasis treatment and therapeutic outcomes in special populations: A collaborative retrospective study, 2023, published in PLoS neglected tropical diseases
  • Adaptation and performance of a mobile application for early detection of cutaneous leishmaniasis, 2021, published in PLoS neglected tropical diseases
  • Diagnostic performance of a Recombinant Polymerase Amplification Test-Lateral Flow (RPA-LF) for cutaneous leishmaniasis in an endemic setting of Colombia, 2021, published in PLoS neglected tropical diseases
  • The different impact of drug-resistant Leishmania on the transcription programs activated in neutrophils, 2024, published in iScience

Nancy G. Saravia frequently publishes in journals such as:

  • PLoS neglected tropical diseases
  • American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
  • The Lancet Global Health
  • iScience
  • Pathogens

Collaborative efforts in research have involved coauthors including Olga Lucía Fernández, Neâl Alexander, María del Mar Castro, Alexandra Cossio, and Andrea Sánchez-Hidalgo. These collaborations suggest engagement in diverse projects often related to tropical and neglected disease research.

In 2013, Nancy G. Saravia received the ASM Moselio Schaechter Award in Recognition of a Developing-Country Microbiologist from the American Society for Microbiology.

Best Publications

  • Advances in leishmaniasis.

    Henry W Murray;Jonathan D Berman;Clive R Davies;Nancy G Saravia

  • Evaluation of Polymerase Chain Reaction, Adenosine Deaminase, and Interferon-γ in Pleural Fluid for the Differential Diagnosis of Pleural Tuberculosis

    Maria Virginia Villegas;Luz Angela Labrada;Nancy Gore Saravia

  • Diagnosis of Cutaneous and Mucocutaneous Leishmaniasis in Colombia: A Comparison of Seven Methods

    K A Weigle;M de Dávalos;P Heredia;R Molineros

  • Resistance to Antimony and Treatment Failure in Human Leishmania (Viannia) Infection

    Ricardo Rojas;Liliana Valderrama;Mabel Valderrama;Maria X. Varona

  • Plumbing the brain drain

    Nancy Gore Saravia;Juan Francisco Miranda

  • Gender Is a Major Determinant of the Clinical Evolution and Immune Response in Hamsters Infected with Leishmania spp.

    Bruno L. Travi;Yaneth Osorio;Peter C. Melby;Peter C. Melby;Bysani Chandrasekar

  • Recurrent lesions in human Leishmania braziliensis infection--reactivation or reinfection?

    N.G. Saravia;I. Segura;L.A. Labrada;K. Weigle

  • Role of the ABC Transporter MRPA (PGPA) in Antimony Resistance in Leishmania infantum Axenic and Intracellular Amastigotes

    Karima El Fadili;Nadine Messier;Philippe Leprohon;Gaétan Roy

  • Antimony Uptake Systems in the Protozoan Parasite Leishmania and Accumulation Differences in Antimony-Resistant Parasites

    Christian Brochu;Jingyu Wang;Gaétan Roy;Nadine Messier

  • Leishmanin skin test standardization and evaluation of safety, dose, storage, longevity of reaction and sensitization.

    Kristen A. Weigle;Liliana Valderrama;Alba Lucia Arias;Cecilia Santrich

  • Natural history, clinical evolution, and the host-parasite interaction in New World cutaneous leishmaniasis

    Kristen Weigle;Nancy Gore Saravia

  • Epidemiologic, genetic, and clinical associations among phenotypically distinct populations of Leishmania (Viannia) in Colombia.

    Nancy G. Saravia;Iris Segura;Ana F. Holguin;Cecilia Santrich

  • Effect of maternal nutritional status on immunological substances in human colostrum and milk

    Reynaldo Miranda;Nancy G Saravia;Ruben Ackerman;Neva Murphy

  • Mucocutaneous leishmaniasis in Colombia: Leishmania braziliensis subspecies diversity.

    Saravia Ng;Holguín Af;McMahon-Pratt D;D'Alessandro A

  • The Relationship of Leishmania braziliensis Subspecies and Immune Response to Disease Expression in New World Leishmaniasis

    Nancy Gore Saravia;Liliana Valderrama;Maricel Labrada;Ana Fernanda Holguin

  • Detection of Leishmania RNA Virus in Leishmania Parasites

    Haroun Zangger;Catherine Ronet;Chantal Desponds;F. Matthew Kuhlmann

  • Noninferiority of Miltefosine Versus Meglumine Antimoniate for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Children

    Luisa Consuelo Rubiano;María Consuelo Miranda;Sandra Muvdi Arenas;Luz Mery Montero

  • Treponema pallidum Elicits Innate and Adaptive Cellular Immune Responses in Skin and Blood during Secondary Syphilis: A Flow-Cytometric Analysis

    Juan C. Salazar;Adriana R. Cruz;Constance D. Pope;Liliana Valderrama

  • Correlation between histopathology, immune response, clinical presentation, and evolution in Leishmania braziliensis infection.

    Y. Gutierrez;Graciela H. Salinas;Gloria Palma;Liliana B. Valderrama

  • Changes in expression of signal transduction proteins in T lymphocytes of patients with leprosy.

    Arnold H. Zea;Arnold H. Zea;Maria T. Ochoa;Paritosh Ghosh;Dan L. Longo

Frequent Co-Authors

Diane McMahon-Pratt
Diane McMahon-Pratt Yale University
John E. Walker
John E. Walker University of Cambridge
Marc Ouellette
Marc Ouellette Université Laval
Peter C. Melby
Peter C. Melby The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Nicolas Fasel
Nicolas Fasel University of Lausanne
Jan H.M. Schellens
Jan H.M. Schellens Utrecht University
Piero Olliaro
Piero Olliaro University of Oxford
Jos H. Beijnen
Jos H. Beijnen Utrecht University
Douglas T. Golenbock
Douglas T. Golenbock University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Isabel Rodriguez-Barraquer
Isabel Rodriguez-Barraquer University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students who pursue Biology and Biochemistry degrees in the USA often explore diverse career pathways. Online degrees in health-related fields continue to grow in popularity due to their flexibility, affordability, and strong job prospects. For example, becoming a medical coder is a popular healthcare career. Many wonder how long does it take to become a medical coder—with some programs offering certifications in under a year.

The job outlook for medical billing and coding remains positive, driven by the ongoing need for accurate health data management in hospitals and clinics. Alongside coding, health information management online programs are popular for those interested in combining healthcare with technology and data analytics.

For students considering advanced study, costs are a key factor. Researching the cost of masters degree in nutrition can help you plan your finances and choose the right program. Overall, online health science degrees open new career opportunities in the growing health and wellness sector.

Best Scientists Citing Nancy G. Saravia

Trending Scientists