World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8229 7683 4407 4013 126 6982

Jonathan Butner publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jonathan Butner between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jonathan Butner published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2020. 11 of the 151 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2020. 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 7 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 2 publications
1999 2025

151 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jonathan Butner: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 2
2000 1
2001 0
2002 1
2003 2
2004 1
2005 2
2006 1
2007 4
2008 4
2009 5
2010 5
2011 6
2012 3
2013 1
2014 7
2015 8
2016 11
2017 13
2018 6
2019 7
2020 15
2021 14
2022 12
2023 9
2024 9
2025 2
Total 151
Download as CSV

Jonathan Butner publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Butner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 126 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 126
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jonathan Butner D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Butner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jonathan Butner is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and medicine, with a focus on clinical psychology, endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and public health.

The scientist's work covers several interconnected topics including eating disorders and behaviors, diabetes management and research, mental health research topics, diabetes management and education, suicide and self-harm studies, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, and posttraumatic stress disorder research.

Jonathan Butner has published extensively, with some recent papers highlighting diverse aspects of health psychology and psychiatric research. Notable publications include:

  • "Daily illness appraisal and collaboration in couples with type 1 diabetes." (2020), Health Psychology
  • "The Binge Eating Genetics Initiative (BEGIN): study protocol" (2020), BMC Psychiatry
  • "The Impact of Complexity on Methods and Findings in Psychological Science" (2021), Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Retention, engagement, and binge-eating outcomes: Evaluating feasibility of the Binge-Eating Genetics Initiative study" (2022), International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • "A multimethod approach to measuring communal coping in adults with type 1 diabetes." (2021), Health Psychology

The pattern of collaboration is reflected in a number of frequent co-authors, whose joint efforts show consistency across publications. Key frequent co-authors include:

  • Cynthia A. Berg
  • Pascal R. Deboeck
  • Qinxin Shi
  • Cynthia M. Bulik
  • Rachael E. Flatt

Jonathan Butner's work is featured in several well-regarded academic journals. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • Journal of Behavioral Medicine
  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Health Psychology
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders

Best Publications

  • Functional projection: how fundamental social motives can bias interpersonal perception.

    Jon K. Maner;Douglas T. Kenrick;D. Vaughn Becker;Theresa E. Robertson

  • Dynamical evolutionary psychology: individual decision rules and emergent social norms.

    Douglas T. Kenrick;Norman P. Li;Jonathan Butner

  • Compliance with a Request in Two Cultures: The Differential Influence of Social Proof and Commitment/Consistency on Collectivists and Individualists

    Robert B. Cialdini;Wilhelmina Wosinska;Daniel W. Barrett;Jonathan Butner

  • Dynamical Evolutionary Psychology: Mapping the Domains of the New Interactionist Paradigm

    Douglas T. Kenrick;Jon K. Maner;Jon Butner;Norman P. Li

  • Collaborative coping and daily mood in couples dealing with prostate cancer.

    Cynthia A. Berg;Deborah J. Wiebe;Jonathan Butner;Lindsey Bloor

  • Outcome Evaluation of a Randomized Trial of the PhoenixCare Intervention: Program of Case Management and Coordinated Care for the Seriously Chronically Ill

    Leona S. Aiken;Jonathan Butner;Carol A. Lockhart;Barbara E. Volk-Craft

  • Hostility, Anger, and Marital Adjustment: Concurrent and Prospective Associations with Psychosocial Vulnerability

    Kelly Glazer Baron;Timothy W. Smith;Jonathan Butner;Jill Nealey-Moore

  • Attachment style and two forms of affect coregulation between romantic partners

    Jonathan Butner;Lisa M. Diamond;Angela M. Hicks

  • Longitudinal trajectories of parental involvement in Type 1 diabetes and adolescents' adherence.

    Pamela S. King;Cynthia A. Berg;Jonathan Butner;Jorie M. Butler

  • Self-regulation of motivation when learning online: The importance of who, why and how

    Carol Sansone;Tamra Fraughton;Joseph L. Zachary;Jonathan Butner

  • Role of Parental Monitoring in Understanding the Benefits of Parental Acceptance on Adolescent Adherence and Metabolic Control of Type 1 Diabetes

    Cynthia A. Berg;Jorie M. Butler;Peter Osborn;Gary King

  • Developmental Processes Associated With Longitudinal Declines in Parental Responsibility and Adherence to Type 1 Diabetes Management Across Adolescence

    Deborah J. Wiebe;Chong Man Chow;Debra L. Palmer;Jonathan Butner

  • Parent-Adolescent Discrepancies in Adolescents’ Competence and the Balance of Adolescent Autonomy and Adolescent and Parent Well-Being in the Context of Type 1 Diabetes

    Jonathan Butner;Cynthia A. Berg;Peter Osborn;Jorie M. Butler

  • The Structure of Parental Involvement and Relations to Disease Management for Youth with Type 1 Diabetes

    Debra L. Palmer;Peter Osborn;Pamela S. King;Cynthia A. Berg

  • Longitudinal Trajectories of Metabolic Control Across Adolescence: Associations With Parental Involvement, Adolescents' Psychosocial Maturity, and Health Care Utilization

    Pamela S. King;Cynthia A. Berg;Jonathan Butner;Linda M. Drew

  • Culturally Adapted Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Chinese Americans With Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Wei Chin Hwang;Hector F. Myers;Eddie Chiu;Elsie Mak

  • Problem-Solving Phase Transitions During Team Collaboration

    Travis J. Wiltshire;Travis J. Wiltshire;Jonathan E. Butner;Stephen M. Fiore

  • Multilevel Modeling of Two Cyclical Processes: Extending Differential Structural Equation Modeling to Nonlinear Coupled Systems.

    Jonathan Butner;Polemnia G. Amazeen;Genna M. Mulvey

  • Individual Differences and Day-to-Day Fluctuations in Perceived Self-Regulation Associated With Daily Adherence in Late Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes

    Cynthia A. Berg;Deborah J. Wiebe;Yana Suchy;Amy E. Hughes

  • Parental persuasive strategies in the face of daily problems in adolescent type 1 diabetes management.

    Cynthia A. Berg;Jonathan E. Butner;Jorie M. Butler;Pamela S. King

Frequent Co-Authors

Cynthia A. Berg
Cynthia A. Berg University of Utah
Deborah J. Wiebe
Deborah J. Wiebe University of Pennsylvania
Yana Suchy
Yana Suchy University of Utah
Craig J. Bryan
Craig J. Bryan The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Timothy W. Smith
Timothy W. Smith University of Utah
Vicki S. Helgeson
Vicki S. Helgeson Carnegie Mellon University
Bert N. Uchino
Bert N. Uchino University of Utah
Douglas T. Kenrick
Douglas T. Kenrick Arizona State University
Perrin C. White
Perrin C. White The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Cynthia M. Bulik
Cynthia M. Bulik University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding career paths, especially in fields focused on helping others. Many students choose to transition into social work, leveraging their knowledge of human behavior and mental health to create meaningful impact in their communities.

If you’re considering this direction, it’s important to understand the education and licensing requirements, which can vary by state. For instance, those becoming a social worker in New Jersey must complete specific coursework and gain supervised experience before applying for licensure. Similarly, the process for becoming a social worker in New Mexico involves approved degree programs and passing state exams.

Requirements are unique in the Northeast as well. To learn about how to become a social worker in New York, prospective professionals must navigate detailed regulations around education and supervised practice hours. The pathway for how to become a social worker in North Carolina emphasizes continuing education and field experience.

Online psychology degrees, paired with knowledge of state-specific requirements, can offer flexible and accessible options for entering this challenging and impactful field.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan Butner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles