World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
31
Citations
6642
World Ranking
11089
National Ranking
5796

Joshua M. Ackerman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joshua M. Ackerman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 92 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Joshua M. Ackerman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joshua M. Ackerman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joshua M. Ackerman is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Psychology, with a significant focus on subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The scientist's work covers multiple topics, with key areas including Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Cultural Differences and Values, Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Social and Intergroup Psychology, COVID-19 and Mental Health, and Eating Disorders and Behaviors.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Joshua M. Ackerman include the following:

  • Common Academic Experiences No One Talks About: Repeated Rejection, Impostor Syndrome, and Burnout (2020), published in Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • What Role Does Pathogen-Avoidance Psychology Play in Pandemics? (2020), published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • COVID-19 stress and eating and drinking behaviors in the United States during the early stages of the pandemic (2021), published in Appetite
  • Medication and substance use increases among people using cannabis medically during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020), published in International Journal of Drug Policy
  • Sounds of sickness: can people identify infectious disease using sounds of coughs and sneezes? (2020), published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Joshua M. Ackerman has collaborated frequently with a number of researchers. These frequent co-authors include Wilson N. Merrell, Soyeon Choi, Oliver Sng, George Cybenko, and Joshua M. Tybur.

The scientist often publishes work in various venues. The most frequent publication outlets for Joshua M. Ackerman are arXiv (Cornell University), Psychological Science, Perspectives on Psychological Science, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, and Appetite.

Best Publications

  • Incidental Haptic Sensations Influence Social Judgments and Decisions

    Joshua M. Ackerman;Christopher C. Nocera;John A. Bargh

  • When the Economy Falters, Do People Spend or Save? Responses to Resource Scarcity Depend on Childhood Environments

    Vladas Griskevicius;Joshua M. Ackerman;Stephanie M. Cantú;Andrew W. Delton

  • Infection Breeds Reticence: The Effects of Disease Salience on Self-Perceptions of Personality and Behavioral Avoidance Tendencies

    Chad R. Mortensen;D. Vaughn Becker;Joshua M. Ackerman;Steven L. Neuberg

  • They All Look the Same to Me (Unless They're Angry): From Out-Group Homogeneity to Out-Group Heterogeneity

    Joshua M. Ackerman;Jenessa R. Shapiro;Steven L. Neuberg;Douglas T. Kenrick

  • The financial consequences of too many men: sex ratio effects on saving, borrowing, and spending.

    Vladas Griskevicius;Joshua M. Tybur;Joshua M. Ackerman;Andrew W. Delton

  • A pox on the mind: Disjunction of attention and memory in the processing of physical disfigurement

    Joshua M. Ackerman;D. Vaughn Becker;Chad R. Mortensen;Takao Sasaki

  • You Wear Me Out The Vicarious Depletion of Self-Control

    Joshua M. Ackerman;Noah J. Goldstein;Jenessa R. Shapiro;John A. Bargh

  • The behavioral immune system: Current concerns and future directions

    Joshua M. Ackerman;Sarah E. Hill;Damian R. Murray

  • Immunizing Against Prejudice Effects of Disease Protection on Attitudes Toward Out-Groups

    Julie Y. Huang;Alexandra Sedlovskaya;Joshua M. Ackerman;John A. Bargh

  • Is friendship akin to kinship

    Joshua M. Ackerman;Douglas T. Kenrick;Mark Schaller

  • Let's get serious: communicating commitment in romantic relationships.

    Joshua M. Ackerman;Vladas Griskevicius;Norman P. Li

  • Common Academic Experiences No One Talks About: Repeated Rejection, Impostor Syndrome, and Burnout:

    Lisa M Jaremka;Joshua M Ackerman;Bertram Gawronski;Nicholas O Rule

  • The Infectiousness of Crowds: Crowding Experiences Are Amplified by Pathogen Threats

    Iris M Wang;Joshua M Ackerman

  • More Memory Bang for the Attentional Buck Self-Protection Goals Enhance Encoding Efficiency for Potentially Threatening Males

    D. Vaughn Becker;Uriah S. Anderson;Steven L. Neuberg;Jon K. Maner

  • I only have eyes for you: Ovulation redirects attention (but not memory) to attractive men.

    Uriah S. Anderson;Elaine F. Perea;D. Vaughn Becker;Joshua M. Ackerman

  • The Costs of Benefits: Help-Refusals Highlight Key Trade-Offs of Social Life:

    Joshua M. Ackerman;Douglas T. Kenrick

  • What Role Does Pathogen-Avoidance Psychology Play in Pandemics?

    Joshua M. Ackerman;Joshua M. Tybur;Aaron D. Blackwell

  • Signal detection on the battlefield: Priming self-protection vs. revenge-mindedness differentially modulates the detection of enemies and allies

    D. Vaughn Becker;Chad R. Mortensen;Joshua M. Ackerman;Jenessa R. Shapiro

  • No sign of quitting: incidental exposure to “no smoking” signs ironically boosts cigarette-approach tendencies in smokers

    Brian D. Earp;Brendan Dill;Jennifer L. Harris;Joshua M. Ackerman

  • Catching (Up with) Magical Contagion: A Review of Contagion Effects in Consumer Contexts

    Julie Y. Huang;Joshua M. Ackerman;George E. Newman

  • The Oxford handbook of evolutionary family psychology

    Justin H Park;JM Ackerman

  • The financial consequences of too many men: Sex ratio effects on saving, borrowing, and spending.

    Vladas Griskevicius;Joshua M. Tybur;Andrew W. Delton;Theresa E. Robertson

Frequent Co-Authors

Jon K. Maner
Jon K. Maner Florida State University
Douglas T. Kenrick
Douglas T. Kenrick Arizona State University
John A. Bargh
John A. Bargh Yale University
Vladas Griskevicius
Vladas Griskevicius University of Minnesota
Steven L. Neuberg
Steven L. Neuberg Arizona State University
Joshua M. Tybur
Joshua M. Tybur Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Carolyn Yoon
Carolyn Yoon University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mark Schaller
Mark Schaller University of British Columbia
Angela Y. Lee
Angela Y. Lee Northwestern University
Ashley N. Gearhardt
Ashley N. Gearhardt University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying psychology in the USA, it's important to consider related fields that offer strong career prospects—such as social work. Online social work degrees provide flexible options for those seeking a profession focused on helping individuals, families, and communities access the support they need.

Many top universities offer both on-campus and online social work programs tailored to different locations. For example, if you are located in the Midwest, explore the top social work programs in Oklahoma. For students on the East Coast, check out the best social work degree programs in Philadelphia. On the West Coast, you can consider the best social work degree programs in Portland. Additionally, those in the Mountain region can review the top social work programs in Salt Lake City.

Whether your passion lies in psychology, counseling, or social work, pursuing an online degree opens doors to diverse career pathways while offering the flexibility to balance study with other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Joshua M. Ackerman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles