World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
11142
World Ranking
5874
National Ranking
3188

Kurt Hugenberg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kurt Hugenberg sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 126 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Kurt Hugenberg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kurt Hugenberg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kurt Hugenberg is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States and conducts research primarily in the fields of Social Sciences, Psychology, and Neuroscience. Their scholarly work spans several related subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Gender Studies.

Their research contributions cover a range of topics, prominently featuring:

  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Kurt Hugenberg has published multiple recent papers in well-recognized venues. Selected papers include:

  • "Poverty and pain: Low-SES people are believed to be insensitive to pain," 2021, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
  • "Race-based biases in judgments of social pain," 2020, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
  • "Sharenting and Children's Privacy in the United States: Parenting Style, Practices, and Perspectives on Sharing Young Children's Photos on Social Media," 2022, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • "Good Cop, Bad Cop: Race-Based Differences in Mental Representations of Police," 2020, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • "Social Cognitive Abilities Predict Unique Aspects of Older Adults' Personal Social Networks," 2021, The Journals of Gerontology Series B

The venues where Kurt Hugenberg frequently publishes include:

  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • Emotion

Among their frequent co-authors are Mattea Sim, Jason C. Deska, Steven M. Almaraz, E. Paige Lloyd, and Michael J. Bernstein. Collaboration with these researchers has contributed to a consistent presence in interdisciplinary social and cognitive science research.

Best Publications

  • Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition : The quad model of implicit task performance

    Frederica R. Conrey;Jeffrey W. Sherman;Bertram Gawronski;Kurt Hugenberg

  • Facing Prejudice Implicit Prejudice and the Perception of Facial Threat

    Kurt Hugenberg;Galen V. Bodenhausen

  • The categorization-individuation model: an integrative account of the other-race recognition deficit.

    Kurt Hugenberg;Steven G. Young;Michael Jason Bernstein;Donald F. Sacco

  • Ambiguity in social categorization: The role of prejudice and facial affect in race categorization.

    Kurt Hugenberg;Galen V. Bodenhausen

  • The Cross-Category Effect Mere Social Categorization Is Sufficient to Elicit an Own-Group Bias in Face Recognition

    Michael J. Bernstein;Steven G. Young;Kurt Hugenberg

  • Racial bias in judgments of physical size and formidability: from size to threat

    John Paul Wilson;Kurt Hugenberg;Nicholas O. Rule

  • Social surrogacy: How favored television programs provide the experience of belonging

    Jaye L. Derrick;Shira Gabriel;Kurt Hugenberg

  • Eye Gaze as Relational Evaluation: Averted Eye Gaze Leads to Feelings of Ostracism and Relational Devaluation

    James H. Wirth;Donald F. Sacco;Kurt Hugenberg;Kipling D. Williams

  • The Self-Regulation of Automatic Associations and Behavioral Impulses

    Jeffrey W. Sherman;Bertram Gawronski;Karen Gonsalkorale;Kurt Hugenberg

  • Categorization and individuation in the cross-race recognition deficit : Toward a solution to an insidious problem

    Kurt Hugenberg;Jennifer Miller;Heather M. Claypool

  • Perception and Motivation in Face Recognition: A Critical Review of Theories of the Cross-Race Effect

    Steven G. Young;Kurt Hugenberg;Michael J. Bernstein;Donald F. Sacco

  • The Reappropriation of Stigmatizing Labels The Reciprocal Relationship Between Power and Self-Labeling

    Adam D. Galinsky;Cynthia S. Wang;Jennifer A. Whitson;Eric M. Anicich

  • Social categorization and the perception of facial affect: target race moderates the response latency advantage for happy faces

    Kurt Hugenberg

  • Class, Race, and the Face: Social Context Modulates the Cross-Race Effect in Face Recognition

    Edwin R. Shriver;Steven G. Young;Kurt Hugenberg;Michael J. Bernstein

  • Social categorization and stereotyping: How social categorization biases person perception and face memory.

    Kurt Hugenberg;Donald F. Sacco

  • THE REAPPROPRIATION OF STIGMATIZING LABELS: IMPLICATIONS FOR SOCIAL IDENTITY

    Adam D Galinsky;Kurt Hugenberg;Carla Groom;Galen V Bodenhausen

  • Being “In” With the In-Crowd: The Effects of Social Exclusion and Inclusion Are Enhanced by the Perceived Essentialism of Ingroups and Outgroups

    Michael Jason Bernstein;Donald F. Sacco;Steven G. Young;Kurt Hugenberg

  • Implicit and explicit attitudes respond differently to increasing amounts of counterattitudinal information

    Robert J. Rydell;Allen R. McConnell;Laura M. Strain;Heather M. Claypool

  • Implicit Theories About Groups and Stereotyping The Role of Group Entitativity

    Robert J. Rydell;Kurt Hugenberg;Devin Ray;Diane M. Mackie

  • Mere social categorization modulates identification of facial expressions of emotion.

    Steven G. Young;Kurt Hugenberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael J. Bernstein
Michael J. Bernstein Pennsylvania State University
Galen V. Bodenhausen
Galen V. Bodenhausen Northwestern University
Robert J. Rydell
Robert J. Rydell Indiana University
Allen R. McConnell
Allen R. McConnell Miami University
Apu Kapadia
Apu Kapadia Indiana University
Bennett I. Bertenthal
Bennett I. Bertenthal Indiana University
C. Neil Macrae
C. Neil Macrae University of Aberdeen
Kipling D. Williams
Kipling D. Williams Purdue University West Lafayette
Olivier Corneille
Olivier Corneille Université Catholique de Louvain
Nicholas O. Rule
Nicholas O. Rule University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology and counseling opens a range of flexible career pathways. Online programs allow students nationwide to balance their studies with work or family responsibilities while gaining essential skills in mental health, human behavior, and therapy.

Affordability is a significant concern for many prospective students. There are many affordable online counseling programs in the US that provide rigorous training at lower costs. For those interested in specific locations, some of the cheapest online counseling programs in Philadelphia and most affordable online counseling degree programs ranking in Texas offer strong options.

Online psychology and counseling degrees can lead to roles such as school counselor, clinical therapist, addiction specialist, or guidance advisor. Students in Arizona may want to explore popular counseling programs in Arizona to find the best fit in their region. Choosing the right online program can launch a rewarding journey in the broad field of psychology and mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Kurt Hugenberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles