World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8847 8261 4706 4283 115 6369

Bennett L. Schwartz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bennett L. Schwartz between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bennett L. Schwartz published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2014. 12 of the 147 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2014. 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 6 publications
1992 2025

147 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bennett L. Schwartz: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 3
1993 2
1994 3
1995 1
1996 1
1997 3
1998 4
1999 1
2000 3
2001 4
2002 7
2003 4
2004 6
2005 6
2006 5
2007 3
2008 3
2009 4
2010 5
2011 3
2012 2
2013 6
2014 10
2015 3
2016 6
2017 7
2018 8
2019 5
2020 6
2021 2
2022 5
2023 4
2024 6
2025 6
Total 147
Download as CSV

Bennett L. Schwartz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bennett L. Schwartz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 115 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 115
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Bennett L. Schwartz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bennett L. Schwartz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Bennett L. Schwartz is affiliated with Florida International University in the United States. Their research spans Neuroscience and Psychology, with a particular focus on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Education, and Philosophy. The main topics of their work include Memory Processes and Influences, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Memory and Neural Mechanisms, Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods, Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics, Neural dynamics and brain function, and Face Recognition and Perception.

Key recent publications by Schwartz include:

  • The MAPS model of self-regulation: Integrating metacognition, agency, and possible selves, 2021, Metacognition and Learning
  • Epistemic curiosity and the region of proximal learning, 2020, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
  • Continuous flash suppression: Known and unknowns, 2020, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Revisiting the Metacognitive and Affective Model of Self-Regulated Learning: Origins, Development, and Future Directions, 2024, Educational Psychology Review
  • The underconfidence-with-practice effect in action memory: The contribution of retrieval practice to metacognitive monitoring, 2022, Metacognition and Learning

Schwartz frequently publishes together with the following co-authors:

  • Ali Pournaghdali (7 joint publications)
  • Janet Metcalfe (3 joint publications)
  • Andreas Jemstedt (2 joint publications)
  • Fabián A. Soto (2 joint publications)
  • Anne M. Cleary (2 joint publications)

Their frequent publication venues include:

  • Metacognition and Learning (3 publications)
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (2 publications)
  • Journal of Cognition (2 publications)
  • Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (1 publication)
  • Educational Psychology Review (1 publication)

In addition to articles, Schwartz has contributed to book publications with Cambridge University Press. The titles include Primate Cognitive Studies (2022) and Tip of the Tongue States (2025).

Best Publications

  • THE MISMEASURE OF MEMORY : WHEN RETRIEVAL FLUENCY IS MISLEADING AS A METAMNEMONIC INDEX

    Aaron S. Benjamin;Robert A. Bjork;Bennett L. Schwartz

  • The cue-familiarity heuristic in metacognition.

    Janet Metcalfe;Bennett L. Schwartz;Scott G. Joaquim

  • Sources of information in metamemory: judgments of learning and feelings of knowing

    Bennett L. Schwartz

  • Cue familiarity but not target retrievability enhances feeling-of-knowing judgments.

    Bennett L. Schwartz;Janet Metcalfe

  • Tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) states: retrieval, behavior, and experience.

    Bennett L. Schwartz;Janet Metcalfe

  • Applied Metacognition

    Unknown

  • The cue-familiarity heuristic in metacognition.

    Unknown

  • Tip-of-the-tongue States: Phenomenology, Mechanism, and Lexical Retrieval

    Bennett L. Schwartz

  • Feeling-of-knowing in episodic memory: an event-related fMRI study

    Anat Maril;Jon S Simons;Jon S Simons;Jason P Mitchell;Bennett L Schwartz

  • The relation between metacognitive monitoring and control

    Lisa K. Son;Bennett L. Schwartz

  • Methodological problems and pitfalls in the study of human metacognition.

    Bennett L. Schwartz;Janet Metcalfe

  • The Inferential and Experiential Bases of Metamemory

    Bennett L. Schwartz;Aaron S. Benjamin;Robert A. Bjork

  • Sparkling at the end of the tongue: The etiology of tip-of-the-tongue phenomenology.

    Bennett L. Schwartz

  • Episodic memory in nonhumans: what, and where, is when?

    Robert R Hampton;Bennett L Schwartz

  • Memory: Foundations and Applications

    Bennett L. Schwartz

  • Single-trial learning of "what" and "who" information in a gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla): implications for episodic memory

    Bennett L. Schwartz;Melanie R. Colon;Isabel C. Sanchez;Isabel Alexa Rodriguez

  • English speakers attend more strongly than Spanish speakers to manner of motion when classifying novel objects and events

    Alan W. Kersten;Christian A. Meissner;Julia Lechuga;Bennett L. Schwartz

  • Episodic memory in primates.

    Bennett L. Schwartz;Siân Evans

  • The Retrieval of Related Information Influences Tip-of-the-Tongue States

    Bennett L. Schwartz;Steven M. Smith

  • Episodic-like memory in a gorilla: A review and new findings ☆

    Bennett L. Schwartz;Megan L. Hoffman;Siân Evans

  • The phenomenology of real and illusory tip-of-the-tongue states

    Bennett L. Schwartz;Donald M. Travis;Anthony M. Castro;Steven M. Smith

  • Working memory load differentially affects tip-of-the-tongue states and feeling-of-knowing judgments.

    Bennett L. Schwartz

Frequent Co-Authors

Janet Metcalfe
Janet Metcalfe Columbia University
Christian A. Meissner
Christian A. Meissner Iowa State University
Anastasia Efklides
Anastasia Efklides Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Aaron S. Benjamin
Aaron S. Benjamin University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Robert A. Bjork
Robert A. Bjork University of California, Los Angeles
Nate Kornell
Nate Kornell Williams College
Steven M. Smith
Steven M. Smith Texas A&M University
Paul Bloom
Paul Bloom Columbia University
Mark L. Howe
Mark L. Howe City, University of London
Jon S. Simons
Jon S. Simons University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens a wide range of online study options and career pathways. Popular routes include clinical psychology, counseling, and specialized fields such as Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT). Each state and city has its own educational and licensing requirements, so it's essential to research the specifics that apply to your desired location and role.

For example, if you are interested in becoming a therapist in Detroit, review the mft requirements in Detroit. Similarly, understanding how to become a marriage and family therapist in Durham may require specific coursework and supervised clinical experience in North Carolina.

Students considering other locations should also look into El Paso mft education requirements or Fort Wayne mft education requirements to ensure they meet all qualifications for licensure.

Most online psychology programs are designed to prepare you for these varied pathways, offering flexibility and practical experience. Always confirm that your chosen degree is accredited and meets state-specific licensing standards.

Best Scientists Citing Bennett L. Schwartz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles