World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7526 7018 7 7 154 7745

Anastasia Efklides publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anastasia Efklides between 1979 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anastasia Efklides published across 46 years, from 1979 to 2024, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2013. 2 of the 165 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2013. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 7 publications 2013: 39 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 3 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications
1979 2024

165 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anastasia Efklides: publications per year, 1979 to 2024
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 0
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 0
1987 1
1988 1
1989 2
1990 0
1991 1
1992 0
1993 3
1994 4
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 2
1999 2
2000 2
2001 4
2002 4
2003 4
2004 4
2005 6
2006 14
2007 3
2008 6
2009 11
2010 6
2011 1
2012 7
2013 39
2014 2
2015 3
2016 16
2017 3
2018 1
2019 3
2020 3
2021 1
2022 0
2023 0
2024 2
Total 165
Download as CSV

Anastasia Efklides publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anastasia Efklides sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 154 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 154
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Anastasia Efklides D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anastasia Efklides sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Anastasia Efklides is affiliated with Aristotle University of Thessaloniki in Greece and conducts research primarily in the field of psychology. Their scholarly work covers several subfields including developmental and educational psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, sociology and political science, education, and information systems.

The research topics Anastasia Efklides focuses on include:

  • Innovative teaching and learning methods
  • Educational strategies and epistemologies
  • Psychological and educational research studies
  • Education and critical thinking development
  • Psychosocial factors impacting youth
  • Education and learning interventions
  • Grit, self-efficacy, and motivation

Frequent coauthors in their work are:

  • Katerina Nerantzaki
  • Panayiota Metallidou
  • Bennett L. Schwartz
  • Irini Dermitzaki
  • Panayota Metallidou

Significant publication venues where Anastasia Efklides has contributed include:

  • Psychology the Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society
  • New Ideas in Psychology
  • Educational Psychology Review
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
  • The American Journal of Psychology

Recent papers by Anastasia Efklides highlight various aspects of cognitive processing, metacognition, and self-regulated learning. These works include:

  • "Feelings and judgments as subjective evaluations of cognitive processing: How reliable are they?" (2020) published in Psychology the Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society
  • "Revisiting the Metacognitive and Affective Model of Self-Regulated Learning: Origins, Development, and Future Directions" (2024) in Educational Psychology Review
  • "Applying Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning in the Classroom" (2020) in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education

Other related research papers often coauthored with Katerina Nerantzaki address topics such as epistemic emotions and task processing, published in venues like New Ideas in Psychology and Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.

Best Publications

  • Interactions of Metacognition with Motivation and Affect in Self-Regulated Learning: The MASRL Model.

    Anastasia Efklides

  • Metacognition Defining : Its Facets and Levels of Functioning in Relation to Self-Regulation and Co-regulation

    Anastasia Efklides

  • Metacognition and Affect: What Can Metacognitive Experiences Tell Us about the Learning Process?.

    Anastasia Efklides

  • Trends and prospects in motivation research

    Anastasia Efklides;Julius Kuhl;Richard M. Sorrentino

  • Social Interaction - What Can It Tell Us about Metacognition and Coregulation in Learning?

    Pekka Salonen;Marja Vauras;Anastasia Efklides

  • The Architecture and Dynamics of Developing Mind: Experiential Structuralism as a Frame for Unifying Cognitive Developmental Theories

    Andreas Demetriou;Anastasia Efklides;Maria Platsidou

  • Effects of mood on students' metacognitive experiences

    Anastasia Efklides;Chryssoula Petkaki

  • The role of metacognitive experiences in the learning process

    Anastasia Efklides

  • Emotional experiences during learning: Multiple, situated and dynamic

    Anastasia Efklides;Simone Volet

  • The concept of 'ageing well' in ten Latin American and European countries

    R. Fernández-Ballesteros;L F. Garcia;D. Abarca;E. Blanc

  • FROM COLLECTIVISM TO INDIVIDUALISM? THE ACCULTURATION OF GREEK IMMIGRANTS IN AUSTRALIA*

    Doreen A. Rosenthal;Richard Bell;Andreas Demetriou;Anastasia Efklides

  • Subjective quality of life in old age in Greece: The effect of demographic factors, emotional state, and adaptation to aging

    Anastasia Efklides;Maria Kalaitzidou;Grace Chankin

  • Metacognitive experiences in problem solving: Metacognition, motivation, and self-regulation.

    Anastasia Efklides

  • Structure and Sequence of Formal and Postformal Thought: General Patterns and Individual Differences.

    Andreas Demetriou;Anastasia Efklides

  • Trends and prospects in metacognition research

    Anastasia Efklides;Plousia Misailidi

  • Metacognitive knowledge of effort, personality factors, and mood state: their relationships with effort-related metacognitive experiences

    Anastasia Efklides;Anastasia Kourkoulou;Frosso Mitsiou;Despina Ziliaskopoulou

  • Neo-Piagetian Theories of Cognitive Development : Implications and Applications for Education

    Andreas Demetriou;Michael Shayer;Anastasia Efklides

  • Wechsler Memory Scale, Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test, and Everyday Memory Questionnaire in Healthy Adults and Alzheimer Patients

    Anastasia Efklides;Efterpi Yiultsi;Theopisti Kangellidou;Fotini Kounti

  • Experiential Structuralism and Neo-Piagetian Theories Toward an Integrated Model

    Andreas Demetriou;Anastasia Efklides

  • How Does Metacognition Contribute to the Regulation of Learning? An Integrative Approach

    Anastasia Efklides

  • Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self- and co-regulation

    A. Efklides

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas Demetriou
Andreas Demetriou University of Cyprus
Marja Vauras
Marja Vauras University of Turku
Magda Tsolaki
Magda Tsolaki Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Bennett L. Schwartz
Bennett L. Schwartz Florida International University
Doreen Rosenthal
Doreen Rosenthal University of Melbourne
Symeon P. Vlachopoulos
Symeon P. Vlachopoulos Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Mary H. Kosmidis
Mary H. Kosmidis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Michael Shayer
Michael Shayer King's College London
Julius Kuhl
Julius Kuhl Osnabrück University
Georgios D. Sideridis
Georgios D. Sideridis Boston Children's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology opens the door to a variety of online degrees and exciting career pathways, including specialties like Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA). Many students choose to pursue careers as Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBAs), who work with individuals on behavior modification and mental health support.

To become a BCBA, specific academic and fieldwork requirements are necessary. These requirements can vary by location. For instance, if you’re interested in practicing in California, you’ll need to meet Riverside bcba requirements or Sacramento bcba requirements depending on your region. In Minnesota, pursuing this path means understanding Saint Paul bcba education requirements, while in Texas, you’ll want to learn how to become a bcba in San Antonio.

Many accredited U.S. universities now offer online degrees in Psychology and ABA, making it easier to gain relevant qualifications while balancing work or family commitments. This flexible approach allows aspiring professionals to meet local licensure requirements and begin rewarding careers in diverse psychological and behavioral settings.

Best Scientists Citing Anastasia Efklides

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles