World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
10958
World Ranking
8402
National Ranking
4487

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
10955
World Ranking
8210
National Ranking
3518

Fred W. Sabb publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fred W. Sabb sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 78 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Fred W. Sabb D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fred W. Sabb sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Fred W. Sabb is affiliated with the University of Oregon in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Psychiatry and Mental Health. Their work encompasses several subfields including Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The main topics explored in their research include:

  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions

Sabb has authored multiple recent papers, notable examples include:

  • "Accelerating Medicines Partnership® Schizophrenia (AMP® SCZ): Rationale and Study Design of the Largest Global Prospective Cohort Study of Clinical High Risk for Psychosis," 2024, published in Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • "Counterpoint. Early intervention for psychosis risk syndromes: Minimizing risk and maximizing benefit," 2020, published in Schizophrenia Research
  • "Sample ascertainment and clinical outcome measures in the Accelerating Medicines Partnership® Schizophrenia Program," 2025, published in Schizophrenia
  • "Digital health technologies in the Accelerating Medicines Partnership® Schizophrenia Program," 2025, published in Schizophrenia
  • "Cognitive assessment in the Accelerating Medicines Partnership® Schizophrenia Program: harmonization priorities and strategies in a diverse international sample," 2025, published in Schizophrenia

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Daniel H. Mathalon
  • Jean Addington
  • Celso Arango
  • Kristin S. Cadenhead
  • Monica E. Calkins

Sabb's research outputs are prominently published in venues such as:

  • Schizophrenia
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin Open
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Schizophrenia Research
  • Brain and Behavior

Best Publications

  • Genome-wide association meta-analysis in 269,867 individuals identifies new genetic and functional links to intelligence

    Jeanne E Savage;Philip R Jansen;Philip R Jansen;Sven Stringer;Kyoko Watanabe

  • Selective Deficits in Prefrontal Cortex Function in Medication-Naive Patients With Schizophrenia

    M Deanna;Cameron S. Carter;Todd S. Braver;Fred W. Sabb

  • Study of 300,486 individuals identifies 148 independent genetic loci influencing general cognitive function

    Gail Davies;Max Lam;Sarah E. Harris;Joey W. Trampush

  • The Neural Correlates of Motor Skill Automaticity

    Russell A. Poldrack;Fred W. Sabb;Karin Foerde;Sabrina M. Tom

  • Recruitment of Anterior Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Human Reasoning: a Parametric Study of Relational Complexity

    James K. Kroger;Fred W. Sabb;Christina L. Fales;Susan Y. Bookheimer

  • Working Memory for Letters, Shapes, and Locations: fMRI Evidence against Stimulus-Based Regional Organization in Human Prefrontal Cortex

    Leigh E. Nystrom;Todd S. Braver;Fred W. Sabb;Mauricio R. Delgado

  • A phenome-wide examination of neural and cognitive function

    R.A. Poldrack;E. Congdon;W. Triplett;K.J. Gorgolewski

  • The cognitive atlas: toward a knowledge foundation for cognitive neuroscience.

    Russell A. Poldrack;Aniket Kittur;Donald Kalar;Eric Miller

  • Anterior Cingulate and the Monitoring of Response Conflict: Evidence from an fMRI Study of Overt Verb Generation

    M Deanna;Todd S. Braver;Fred W. Sabb;Douglas C. Noll

  • A unique adolescent response to reward prediction errors

    Jessica R Cohen;Jessica R Cohen;Robert F Asarnow;Fred W Sabb;Robert M Bilder

  • GWAS meta-analysis reveals novel loci and genetic correlates for general cognitive function: a report from the COGENT consortium

    Joey W Trampush;M L Z Yang;J Yu;E. Knowles

  • The Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11: reassessment of its structure in a community sample.

    Steven P. Reise;Tyler M. Moore;Fred W. Sabb;Amira K. Brown

  • Phenomics: The systematic study of phenotypes on a genome-wide scale

    R. M. Bilder;R. M. Bilder;F. W. Sabb;F. W. Sabb;T. D. Cannon;T. D. Cannon;E. D. London;E. D. London

  • Blunted activation in orbitofrontal cortex during mania: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

    Lori L. Altshuler;Lori L. Altshuler;Susan Y. Bookheimer;Jennifer Townsend;Manuel A. Proenza

  • Increased amygdala activation during mania: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

    Lori Altshuler;Susan Bookheimer;Manuel A. Proenza;Jennifer Townsend

  • Overt Verbal Responding during fMRI Scanning: Empirical Investigations of Problems and Potential Solutions

    M Deanna;Fred W. Sabb;Cameron S. Carter;Todd S. Braver

  • Functional MRI changes during panic anticipation and imagery exposure.

    Alexander Bystritsky;Deborah Pontillo;Mark Powers;Fred W. Sabb

  • Regional brain changes in bipolar I depression: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study

    Lori Altshuler;Susan Bookheimer;Jennifer Townsend;Manuel A Proenza

  • Cognitive ontologies for neuropsychiatric phenomics research.

    Robert M. Bilder;Fred W. Sabb;D. Stott Parker;Donald Kalar

  • Predicting risky choices from brain activity patterns

    Sarah M. Helfinstein;Tom Schonberg;Eliza Congdon;Katherine H. Karlsgodt

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert M. Bilder
Robert M. Bilder University of California, Los Angeles
Katherine E. Burdick
Katherine E. Burdick Brigham and Women's Hospital
Edythe D. London
Edythe D. London University of California, Los Angeles
Russell A. Poldrack
Russell A. Poldrack Stanford University
Aarno Palotie
Aarno Palotie University of Helsinki
Tyrone D. Cannon
Tyrone D. Cannon Yale University
Ole A. Andreassen
Ole A. Andreassen Oslo University Hospital
Ingrid Melle
Ingrid Melle University of Oslo
Nikolaos Smyrnis
Nikolaos Smyrnis National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Srdjan Djurovic
Srdjan Djurovic Oslo University Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience in the USA can open doors to a range of lucrative and rewarding careers. If you’re curious about your earning potential, review our resource on the college majors that make the most money. While Neuroscience is challenging, its interdisciplinary nature is also valued in top-paying fields like healthcare, biotechnology, and research.

For students looking for flexibility, there are several best online colleges that accept fafsa. These institutions offer accredited programs at affordable rates and can help you finance your studies with federal aid. Many even provide online bachelor’s or certificate options relevant to neuroscience.

Additionally, consider online courses with certificates to boost your credentials or specialize in high-demand skills quickly. These short-term programs can supplement your neuroscience background and increase job prospects.

Lastly, if you’re weighing options for a less rigorous academic path, check out the easiest college majors for online learners. Making the right choice can help you balance your aspirations with your academic strengths.

Best Scientists Citing Fred W. Sabb

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles