World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8619 8053 4596 4187 114 5748

James R. Brockmole publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James R. Brockmole between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James R. Brockmole published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2012. 2 of the 116 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2012. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 7 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
2000 2025

116 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James R. Brockmole: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 0
2002 3
2003 5
2004 2
2005 5
2006 4
2007 1
2008 7
2009 6
2010 13
2011 9
2012 16
2013 6
2014 3
2015 3
2016 2
2017 6
2018 5
2019 5
2020 7
2021 2
2022 2
2023 1
2024 1
2025 1
Total 116
Download as CSV

James R. Brockmole publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James R. Brockmole sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 114 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 114
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

James R. Brockmole D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James R. Brockmole sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

James R. Brockmole is affiliated with the University of Notre Dame in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Neuroscience with a focus on Cognitive Neuroscience. This work includes contributions to Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Human-Computer Interaction, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

The scientist's published papers have appeared in a variety of journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Journal of Vision
  • Journal of Educational Psychology

Major research topics covered by James R. Brockmole encompass:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Mind wandering and attention
  • Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Free Will and Agency
  • Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts

Among their recent papers are the following, listed with publication year and venue:

  • The eye-mind wandering link: Identifying gaze indices of mind wandering across tasks., 2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
  • Where the eyes wander: The relationship between mind wandering and fixation allocation to visually salient and semantically informative static scene content, 2020, Journal of Vision
  • Attentional selection is biased towards controllable stimuli, 2020, Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • The mediating role of attention in the association between math anxiety and math performance: An eye-tracking study., 2022, Journal of Educational Psychology
  • Interactions among endogenous, exogenous, and agency-driven attentional selection mechanisms in interactive displays, 2022, Attention Perception & Psychophysics

Frequent collaborators with James R. Brockmole include:

  • Kristina Krasich
  • Greg Huffman
  • Myrthe Faber
  • Kevin M. O'neill
  • Samuel Murray

Best Publications

  • VISUAL SALIENCY DOES NOT ACCOUNT FOR EYE MOVEMENTS DURING VISUAL SEARCH IN REAL-WORLD SCENES

    John M. Henderson;James R. Brockmole;Monica S. Castelhano;Michael Mack

  • Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search

    James R. Brockmole;John M. Henderson

  • Age-related change in visual working memory: a study of 55,753 participants aged 8-75

    James R. Brockmole;Robert H. Logie

  • Contextual cueing in naturalistic scenes: Global and local contexts.

    James R. Brockmole;Monica S. Castelhano;John M. Henderson

  • Recognition and attention guidance during contextual cueing in real-world scenes: evidence from eye movements.

    James R. Brockmole;John M. Henderson

  • Temporal integration between visual images and visual percepts.

    James R. Brockmole;Ranxiao Frances Wang;David E. Irwin

  • Do binding deficits account for age-related decline in visual working memory?

    James R. Brockmole;Mario A. Parra;Sergio Della Sala;Robert H. Logie

  • Human navigation in nested environments.

    Ranxiao Frances Wang;James R. Brockmole

  • The role of attention in binding visual features in working memory : evidence from cognitive ageing

    Louise A. Brown;James R. Brockmole

  • Feature bindings endure without attention: Evidence from an explicit recall task

    Daniel A. Gajewski;James R. Brockmole

  • The World Within Reach: Effects of Hand Posture and Tool Use on Visual Cognition

    James R. Brockmole;Christopher C. Davoli;Richard A. Abrams;Jessica K. Witt

  • Simultaneous spatial updating in nested environments.

    Ranxiao Frances Wang;James R. Brockmole

  • Working memory tasks differ in factor structure across age cohorts: Implications for dedifferentiation.

    Wendy Johnson;Robert H. Logie;James R. Brockmole

  • LATEST: A model of saccadic decisions in space and time.

    Benjamin W. Tatler;James R. Brockmole;R. H. S. Carpenter

  • Bound feature combinations in visual short-term memory are fragile but influence long-term learning

    Robert H. Logie;James R. Brockmole;Annelinde R. E. Vandenbroucke

  • Feature binding in visual short-term memory is unaffected by task-irrelevant changes of location, shape, and color

    Robert H. Logie;James R. Brockmole;Snehlata Jaswal

  • Prioritization of new objects in real-world scenes: evidence from eye movements.

    James R. Brockmole;John M. Henderson

  • Processing Speed and Visuospatial Executive Function Predict Visual Working Memory Ability in Older Adults

    Louise A. Brown;James R. Brockmole;Alan J. Gow;Ian J. Deary

  • Attention capture is modulated in dual-task situations.

    Walter R. Boot;James R. Brockmole;Daniel J. Simons

  • Automated gaze-based mind wandering detection during computerized learning in classrooms

    Stephen Hutt;Kristina Krasich;Caitlin Mills;Nigel Bosch

  • Prioritizing new objects for eye fixation in real-world scenes: Effects of object–scene consistency

    James R. Brockmole;John M. Henderson

Frequent Co-Authors

John M. Henderson
John M. Henderson University of California, Davis
Walter R. Boot
Walter R. Boot Florida State University
Jessica K. Witt
Jessica K. Witt Colorado State University
David E. Irwin
David E. Irwin University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Sidney K. D'Mello
Sidney K. D'Mello University of Colorado Boulder
Richard A. Abrams
Richard A. Abrams Washington University in St. Louis
Caitlin Mills
Caitlin Mills University of Minnesota
Robert H. Logie
Robert H. Logie University of Edinburgh
Nicole M. McNeil
Nicole M. McNeil University of Notre Dame
Daniel J. Simons
Daniel J. Simons University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and career options, such as counseling, social work, and mental health services. Many students are looking for ways to earn their qualifications affordably, making the choice of school and program essential.

For example, students searching for most affordable counseling degree programs in Georgia can find regionally accredited, budget-friendly options that don’t sacrifice academic quality. Similarly, consideration should be given to location and costs. In the Midwest, finding the cheapest counseling programs in Illinois or affordable counseling programs in Indiana can help students reduce student loan debt while accessing top educational resources.

For those on the West Coast, the most affordable counseling degree programs in Los Angeles offer pathways to licensure and employment in a vibrant urban setting. Exploring these options ensures you find a balance between academic aspirations, career goals, and affordability, setting the stage for a rewarding future in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing James R. Brockmole

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles