World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Andrew Hollingworth

Andrew Hollingworth

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
52
Citations
13412
World Ranking
4936
National Ranking
2713

Andrew Hollingworth publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Hollingworth sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 135 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Andrew Hollingworth D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Hollingworth sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew Hollingworth is a researcher affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States. Their work spans a range of topics within neuroscience and psychology, primarily focusing on cognitive neuroscience and experimental psychology. The subfields of study include cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, human-computer interaction, and biomedical engineering.

The primary topics in Hollingworth's research encompass visual perception and processing mechanisms, neural and behavioral psychology studies, and multisensory perception and integration. Additional areas of focus include human-automation interaction and safety, color perception and design, gaze tracking and assistive technology, as well as face recognition and perception.

Hollingworth's scholarly output includes multiple recent papers published across various journals. Noteworthy recent publications include:

  • Categorical cuing: Object categories structure the acquisition of statistical regularities to guide visual search (2021), Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Guidance of attention from visual working memory is feature-based, not object-based: Implications for models of feature binding (2021), Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Visual working memory content influences correspondence processes (2021), Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
  • Object-mediated overwriting across saccades (2021), Journal of Vision
  • Real-world object categories and scene contexts conjointly structure statistical learning for the guidance of visual search (2022), Attention Perception & Psychophysics

The researcher frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Journal of Vision
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • Computers in Biology and Medicine

Hollingworth collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including Ariel M Kershner, Cathleen M. Moore, Zexuan Niu, J. Toby Mordkoff, and Michael L. Paavola.

Best Publications

  • HIGH-LEVEL SCENE PERCEPTION

    John M. Henderson;Andrew Hollingworth

  • The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing

    John M. Henderson;Phillip A. Weeks Jr.;Andrew Hollingworth

  • Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes

    Andrew Hollingworth;John M. Henderson

  • Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger.

    Kiel Christianson;Andrew Hollingworth;John F. Halliwell;Fernanda Ferreira

  • Eye Movements During Scene Viewing: An Overview

    John M. Henderson;Andrew Hollingworth

  • The Role of Fixation Position in Detecting Scene Changes Across Saccades

    John M. Henderson;Andrew Hollingworth

  • To see and remember: visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes.

    Andrew Hollingworth;Carrick C. Williams;John M. Henderson

  • Theories and measurement of visual attentional processing in anxiety

    Mariann R. Weierich;Teresa A. Treat;Andrew Hollingworth

  • Does consistent scene context facilitate object perception

    Andrew Hollingworth;John M. Henderson

  • Constructing Visual Representations of Natural Scenes: The Roles of Short- and Long-Term Visual Memory

    Andrew Hollingworth

  • Understanding the function of visual short-term memory: transsaccadic memory, object correspondence, and gaze correction.

    Andrew Hollingworth;Ashleigh M. Richard;Steven J. Luck

  • Semantic Informativeness Mediates the Detection of Changes in Natural Scenes

    Andrew Hollingworth;John M. Henderson

  • Misinterpretations of Garden-Path Sentences: Implications for Models of Sentence Processing and Reanalysis

    Fernanda Ferreira;Kiel Christianson;Andrew Hollingworth

  • Eye movements and visual memory: Detecting changes to saccade targets in scenes

    John M. Henderson;Andrew Hollingworth

  • Do New Objects Capture Attention

    Steven L. Franconeri;Andrew Hollingworth;Daniel J. Simons

  • Object-position binding in visual memory for natural scenes and object arrays.

    Andrew Hollingworth

  • Simultaneous Control of Attention by Multiple Working Memory Representations

    Valerie M Beck;Andrew Hollingworth;Steven J Luck

  • Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects

    Andrew Hollingworth

  • Failures of retrieval and comparison constrain change detection in natural scenes.

    Andrew Hollingworth

  • The comparison of visual working memory representations with perceptual inputs.

    Joo-seok Hyun;Geoffrey F. Woodman;Edward K. Vogel;Andrew Hollingworth

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven J. Luck
Steven J. Luck University of California, Davis
John M. Henderson
John M. Henderson University of California, Davis
Stefan Van der Stigchel
Stefan Van der Stigchel Utrecht University
Shaun P. Vecera
Shaun P. Vecera University of Iowa
Daniel J. Simons
Daniel J. Simons University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
James M. Gold
James M. Gold University of Maryland, Baltimore
Steven Franconeri
Steven Franconeri Northwestern University
John P. Spencer
John P. Spencer University of East Anglia
Fernanda Ferreira
Fernanda Ferreira University of California, Davis
Jan R. Wessel
Jan R. Wessel University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree online opens flexible pathways in counseling, research, human resources, and beyond. Many universities across the USA offer accredited online psychology programs that combine foundational theory with practical, real-world experience. These programs often cater to different interests, ranging from clinical psychology to organizational behavior and forensic psychology.

When considering your options, location can play a key role in specialty areas, internship availability, and networking opportunities. For instance, students interested in Texas can explore the top psychology degrees in Arlington or check current best psychology program rankings in Austin for tailored offerings. If you’re looking to study on the West Coast, many institutions feature on the list of top psychology programs in California. The South also provides strong choices, such as the top psychology degrees in Charleston.

Whether you aim for entry-level work or hope to continue with graduate studies, exploring these regionally recognized programs can set you on a meaningful career path in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew Hollingworth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles