World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
7886
World Ranking
7845
National Ranking
4218

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
7312
World Ranking
8399
National Ranking
3596

Steven Franconeri publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven Franconeri sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 171 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Steven Franconeri D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven Franconeri sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steven Franconeri is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of Computer Science. The scholar's work spans several subfields, including Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Food Science.

Their research focuses on a range of topics, notably:

  • Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Data Analysis with R
  • Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods

Steven Franconeri has published extensively, with notable recent papers including:

  • The Science of Visual Data Communication: What Works (2021) published in Gothic.net
  • The Unmet Data Visualization Needs of Decision Makers Within Organizations (2021) published in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • Declutter and Focus: Empirically Evaluating Design Guidelines for Effective Data Communication (2021) published in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • Seeing What You Believe or Believing What You See? Belief Biases Correlation Estimation (2022) published in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • Visual Arrangements of Bar Charts Influence Comparisons in Viewer Takeaways (2021) published in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

The venues in which they frequently publish reflect their focus, with the most common being:

  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Vision
  • Cognition
  • Gothic.net

Frequent co-authors include Cindy Xiong, Fumeng Yang, Cristina R. Ceja, Kylie Lin, and Caitlyn McColeman, indicating collaborative research efforts primarily in visualization and cognitive science domains.

Best Publications

  • Moving and looming stimuli capture attention.

    Steven L. Franconeri;Daniel J. Simons

  • How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism.

    George A. Alvarez;Steven L. Franconeri

  • Flexible cognitive resources: Competitive content maps for attention and memory

    Steven L. Franconeri;George A. Alvarez;Patrick Cavanagh

  • Change Blindness in the Absence of a Visual Disruption

    Daniel J Simons;Steven L Franconeri;Rebecca L Reimer

  • The Science of Visual Data Communication: What Works

    Unknown

  • Eye movements during emotion recognition in faces.

    M. W. Schurgin;J. Nelson;S. Iida;H. Ohira

  • Do New Objects Capture Attention

    Steven L. Franconeri;Andrew Hollingworth;Daniel J. Simons

  • Ranking visualizations of correlation using Weber's law

    Lane Harrison;Fumeng Yang;Steven Franconeri;Remco Chang

  • Tracking Multiple Objects Is Limited Only by Object Spacing, Not by Speed, Time, or Capacity

    Steven Franconeri;S. V. Jonathan;J. M. Scimeca

  • Number estimation relies on a set of segmented objects.

    Steven L. Franconeri;Douglas K. Bemis;George Angelo Alvarez

  • ISOTYPE Visualization: Working Memory, Performance, and Engagement with Pictographs

    Steve Haroz;Robert Kosara;Steven L. Franconeri

  • Look before you regulate: differential perceptual strategies underlying expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal.

    Genna M. Bebko;Steven L. Franconeri;Kevin N. Ochsner;Joan Y. Chiao

  • Sudden insight is associated with shutting out visual inputs

    Carola Salvi;Carola Salvi;Emanuela Bricolo;Steven L. Franconeri;John Kounios

  • A Task-Based Taxonomy of Cognitive Biases for Information Visualization

    Evanthia Dimara;Steven Franconeri;Catherine Plaisant;Anastasia Bezerianos

  • The siren song of implicit change detection.

    Stephen R. Mitroff;Daniel J. Simons;Steven L. Franconeri

  • How many locations can be selected at once

    Steven L. Franconeri;George A. Alvarez;James T. Enns

  • Four types of ensemble coding in data visualizations

    Danielle Albers Szafir;Steve Haroz;Michael Gleicher;Steven Franconeri

  • Perception of Average Value in Multiclass Scatterplots

    Michael Gleicher;Michael Correll;Christine Nothelfer;Steven Franconeri

  • Evidence against a speed limit in multiple-object tracking

    S. L. Franconeri;J. Y. Lin;J. T. Enns;Z. W. Pylyshyn

  • Object Correspondence across Brief Occlusion Is Established on the Basis of both Spatiotemporal and Surface Feature Cues.

    Andrew Hollingworth;Steven L. Franconeri

  • The dynamic events that capture visual attention: A reply to Abrams and Christ (2005)

    Steven L. Franconeri;Daniel J. Simons

  • Comparing averages in time series data

    Michael Correll;Danielle Albers;Steven Franconeri;Michael Gleicher

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel J. Simons
Daniel J. Simons University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
George A. Alvarez
George A. Alvarez Harvard University
David H. Uttal
David H. Uttal Northwestern University
Michael Gleicher
Michael Gleicher University of Wisconsin–Madison
James T. Enns
James T. Enns University of British Columbia
Enrico Bertini
Enrico Bertini Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital
Joan Y. Chiao
Joan Y. Chiao Northwestern University
Zenon W. Pylyshyn
Zenon W. Pylyshyn Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Dedre Gentner
Dedre Gentner Northwestern University
Susan Goldin-Meadow
Susan Goldin-Meadow University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens a variety of online degree options and career pathways, especially in mental health services. Many students choose to pursue an online master’s program to prepare for roles such as licensed counselors or therapists. However, it’s important to understand that requirements vary significantly by state.

For example, those interested in pursuing licensure can review the specific licensed therapist requirements in Portland and compare them to the licensed therapist requirements in Raleigh. Each jurisdiction may differ in education hours, supervised work experience, and licensing exams.

If you are planning to move or study elsewhere, consider researching the licensed therapist requirements in Reno or learn about Richmond licensed therapist requirements. Staying informed about these local requirements will help you plan a smooth academic journey and successfully transition into your professional career after graduation.

Best Scientists Citing Steven Franconeri

Trending Scientists