World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Patrick Cavanagh

Patrick Cavanagh

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 84 1224 1078 62 52 441 26859

Patrick Cavanagh publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Patrick Cavanagh between 1950 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Patrick Cavanagh published across 76 years, from 1950 to 2025, averaging 7.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 56 publications in 2010. 29 of the 550 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1950 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 56. Peak 56 publications in 2010. 1950: 1 publication 1951: 0 publications 1952: 0 publications 1953: 0 publications 1954: 0 publications 1955: 0 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 3 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 7 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 11 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 10 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 56 publications 2011: 26 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 12 publications
1950 2025

550 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Patrick Cavanagh: publications per year, 1950 to 2025
Year Publications
1950 1
1951 0
1952 0
1953 0
1954 0
1955 0
1956 0
1957 0
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 1
1975 0
1976 1
1977 1
1978 3
1979 1
1980 2
1981 4
1982 2
1983 2
1984 7
1985 7
1986 5
1987 11
1988 4
1989 10
1990 7
1991 9
1992 10
1993 8
1994 5
1995 8
1996 11
1997 5
1998 12
1999 9
2000 15
2001 9
2002 6
2003 3
2004 9
2005 8
2006 5
2007 12
2008 10
2009 10
2010 56
2011 26
2012 21
2013 22
2014 19
2015 25
2016 16
2017 16
2018 15
2019 15
2020 8
2021 22
2022 12
2023 15
2024 17
2025 12
Total 550
Download as CSV

Patrick Cavanagh publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Cavanagh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–450 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 441 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32 441
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Patrick Cavanagh D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Cavanagh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86 84
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Patrick Cavanagh is affiliated with York University in Canada and conducts research primarily in the field of Neuroscience, with a focus on Cognitive Neuroscience. Their scholarly work addresses various aspects of visual perception and processing mechanisms, neural dynamics and brain function, as well as tactile and sensory interactions.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies
  • Ocular and Laser Science Research
  • Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Patrick Cavanagh are:

  • Peter U. Tse
  • Stuart Anstis
  • Marvin R. Maechler
  • Bernard Marius 't Hart
  • Sharif Saleki

Common publication venues for their work include:

  • Journal of Vision
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • i-Perception
  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • Scientific Reports

Representative recent academic papers authored or coauthored by Patrick Cavanagh are:

  • The Architecture of Object-Based Attention, 2023, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • The Language of Vision*, 2021, Perception
  • Apparent Motion Is Computed in Perceptual Coordinates, 2020, i-Perception
  • Pop-out for illusory rather than veridical trajectories with double-drift stimuli, 2020, Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • Attentional tracking takes place over perceived rather than veridical positions, 2021, Attention Perception & Psychophysics

Best Publications

  • The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects

    George Alvarez;Patrick Cavanagh

  • Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness

    Sheng He;Patrick Cavanagh;James Intriligator

  • The spatial resolution of visual attention

    James Intriligator;Patrick Cavanagh

  • Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention.

    Patrick Cavanagh;George A. Alvarez

  • Motion: the long and short of it.

    Patrick Cavanagh;George Mather

  • Retinotopy and color sensitivity in human visual cortical area V8.

    Nouchine Hadjikhani;Arthur K. Liu;Anders M. Dale;Patrick Cavanagh

  • Cortical fMRI activation produced by attentive tracking of moving targets

    Jody C. Culham;Stephan A. Brandt;Stephan A. Brandt;Patrick Cavanagh;Nancy G. Kanwisher

  • Attention and the subjective expansion of time.

    Peter Ulric Tse;James Intriligator;Josée Rivest;Patrick Cavanagh

  • Attention-based motion perception

    Patrick Cavanagh

  • The attentional requirements of consciousness

    Michael A. Cohen;Patrick Cavanagh;Marvin M. Chun;Ken Nakayama

  • Familiarity and pop-out in visual search

    Qinqin Wang;Patrick Cavanagh;Marc Green

  • Independent Resources for Attentional Tracking in the Left and Right Visual Hemifields

    George A. Alvarez;Patrick Cavanagh

  • Visual stability based on remapping of attention pointers

    Patrick Cavanagh;Patrick Cavanagh;Amelia R. Hunt;Amelia R. Hunt;Arash Afraz;Arash Afraz;Martin Rolfs

  • Predictive remapping of attention across eye movements

    Martin Rolfs;Martin Rolfs;Donatas Jonikaitis;Heiner Deubel;Patrick Cavanagh

  • Flexible cognitive resources: Competitive content maps for attention and memory

    Steven L. Franconeri;George A. Alvarez;Patrick Cavanagh

  • Attention response functions: characterizing brain areas using fMRI activation during parametric variations of attentional load.

    Jody C Culham;Patrick Cavanagh;Nancy G Kanwisher;Nancy G Kanwisher

  • A minimum motion technique for judging equiluminance

    S. M. Anstis;P. Cavanagh;J. D. Mollon L. T. Sharpe

  • The blinking spotlight of attention.

    Rufin VanRullen;Thomas Carlson;Thomas Carlson;Patrick Cavanagh

  • The contribution of color to motion in normal and color-deficient observers

    P. Cavanagh;S. M. Anstis

  • The 'when' pathway of the right parietal lobe.

    Lorella Battelli;Alvaro Pascual-Leone;Alvaro Pascual-Leone;Patrick Cavanagh;Patrick Cavanagh

  • FACIAL ORGANIZATION BLOCKS ACCESS TO LOW-LEVEL FEATURES: AN OBJECT INFERIORITY EFFECT

    Satoru Suzuki;Patrick Cavanagh

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Rolfs
Martin Rolfs Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Peter U. Tse
Peter U. Tse Dartmouth College
David Whitney
David Whitney University of California, Berkeley
George A. Alvarez
George A. Alvarez Harvard University
Rufin VanRullen
Rufin VanRullen Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Sheng He
Sheng He Chinese Academy of Sciences
Takeo Watanabe
Takeo Watanabe Brown University
Jody C. Culham
Jody C. Culham University of Western Ontario
Martin Arguin
Martin Arguin University of Montreal
Frans A. J. Verstraten
Frans A. J. Verstraten University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens up diverse career opportunities, especially in fields like behavior analysis, counseling, and mental health. Many students choose online programs to balance studies with work and family commitments. These flexible degrees can lead to various state-specific certifications and professional pathways.

One fast-growing career option is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), which is in high demand across the United States. Each location may have unique requirements and steps for BCBA certification. For example, you can find detailed guidance on how to become a bcba in Lexington, or review the bcba certification requirements in Lincoln.

If you’re interested in opportunities on the West Coast, you can explore information about bcba certification requirements in Long Beach as well as an overview of Los Angeles bcba requirements. These resources can help you decide which online programs and certifications best fit your career ambitions in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick Cavanagh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles