World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
18406
World Ranking
6795
National Ranking
3683

Priti Shah publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Priti Shah sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 120 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Priti Shah D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Priti Shah sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Priti Shah is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their academic work primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with notable contributions in subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Education.

Their research topics encompass a diverse range of areas including mind wandering and attention, climate change communication and perception, behavioral health and interventions, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, misinformation and its impacts, neural and behavioral psychology studies, and data visualization and analytics.

Priti Shah has published in several venues frequently, including:

  • Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
  • npj Science of Learning
  • Cognitive Science
  • PLoS ONE
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied

Among recent scholarly papers, some notable works are:

  • "The Science of Visual Data Communication: What Works" (2021, Gothic.net)
  • "Growth mindset and academic outcomes: a comparison of US and Chinese students" (2021, npj Science of Learning)
  • "Rookies connected: Interpersonal relationships among newcomers, newcomer adjustment processes, and socialization outcomes." (2021, Journal of Applied Psychology)
  • "The influence of environmental reliability in the marshmallow task: An extension study" (2020, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology)
  • "Perceptions of the malleability of fluid and crystallized intelligence." (2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology General)

The scientist collaborates regularly with other researchers, including frequent co-authors such as Madison Fansher, John Jonides, Xin Sun, Jahla Osborne, and Shaylene E. Nancekivell.

Best Publications

  • Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control

    Akira Miyake;Priti Shah

  • The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: an individual differences approach.

    Priti Shah;Akira Miyake;Akira Miyake

  • How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis.

    Akira Miyake;Naomi P. Friedman;David A. Rettinger;Priti Shah

  • Short- and long-term benefits of cognitive training

    Susanne M. Jaeggi;Martin Buschkuehl;John Jonides;Priti Shah

  • Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning

    Hsin Kai Wu;Priti Shah

  • Aging, Training, and the Brain: A Review and Future Directions

    Cindy Lustig;Priti Shah;Rachael Seidler;Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz

  • How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis.

    Unknown

  • Review of Graph Comprehension Research: Implications for Instruction

    Priti Shah;James Hoeffner

  • Models of Working Memory

    Akira Miyake;Priti Shah

  • The role of individual differences in cognitive training and transfer

    Susanne M. Jaeggi;Martin Buschkuehl;Priti Shah;John Jonides

  • A Model of the Perceptual and Conceptual Processes in Graph Comprehension

    Patricia A. Carpenter;Priti Shah

  • The Science of Visual Data Communication: What Works

    Unknown

  • Models of Working Memory: Toward Unified Theories of Working Memory: Emerging General Consensus, Unresolved Theoretical Issues, and Future Research Directions

    Akira Miyake;Priti Shah

  • Uninhibited imaginations: Creativity in adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

    Holly A. White;Priti Shah

  • Graphs as aids to knowledge construction: Signaling techniques for guiding the process of graph comprehension.

    Priti Shah;Richard E. Mayer;Richard E. Mayer;Mary Hegarty;Mary Hegarty

  • Creative style and achievement in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

    Holly A. White;Priti Shah

  • Cultural Differences in Allocation of Attention in Visual Information Processing

    Aysecan Boduroglu;Priti Shah;Richard E. Nisbett

  • The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking

    Priti Shah;Akira Miyake

  • Conceptual limitations in comprehending line graphs.

    Priti Shah;Patricia A. Carpenter

  • Bar and Line Graph Comprehension: An Interaction of Top‐Down and Bottom‐Up Processes

    Priti Shah;Eric G. Freedman

  • Models of Working Memory: Models of Working Memory: An Introduction

    Priti Shah;Akira Miyake

  • Benefitting InfoVis with Visual Difficulties

    J. Hullman;E. Adar;P. Shah

Frequent Co-Authors

Susanne M. Jaeggi
Susanne M. Jaeggi University of California, Irvine
Martin Buschkuehl
Martin Buschkuehl University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Akira Miyake
Akira Miyake University of Colorado Boulder
John Jonides
John Jonides University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mary Hegarty
Mary Hegarty University of California, Santa Barbara
David H. Uttal
David H. Uttal Northwestern University
Steven Franconeri
Steven Franconeri Northwestern University
Susan A. Gelman
Susan A. Gelman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz
Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Patricia A. Carpenter
Patricia A. Carpenter Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology and counseling can unlock a wide range of career pathways, from clinical practice to educational guidance and mental health advocacy. Today, many accredited institutions offer flexible online programs, making it easier for students across the nation to access top-quality education and specializations in fields such as clinical therapy, school counseling, or rehabilitation services.

Students interested in regional advantages can start by reviewing some of the top counseling degree programs in Maryland or view the best college counseling programs in Michigan for varying program strengths and admission requirements. If you’re considering a broader area, check out the best counseling degree programs in the Midwest, which highlights institutions known for research and student support.

Additionally, Minnesota’s robust offerings are featured in the list of best counseling degree programs in Minnesota, ideal for those seeking hands-on practicum experiences. No matter your location, online psychology and counseling programs are designed to prepare you for licensure and open doors in healthcare, schools, and community organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Priti Shah

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles