World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 52 4908 4549 2703 2446 149 16624

Susanne M. Jaeggi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Susanne M. Jaeggi between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Susanne M. Jaeggi published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2020. 16 of the 168 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2020. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 6 publications
2003 2025

168 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Susanne M. Jaeggi: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 1
2008 3
2009 2
2010 6
2011 7
2012 13
2013 7
2014 11
2015 7
2016 10
2017 11
2018 10
2019 11
2020 14
2021 12
2022 13
2023 13
2024 10
2025 6
Total 168
Download as CSV

Susanne M. Jaeggi publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susanne M. Jaeggi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 149 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 149
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Susanne M. Jaeggi D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susanne M. Jaeggi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 52
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Susanne M. Jaeggi is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine, in the United States. Their research spans several domains within psychology and neuroscience, with a primary focus on cognitive abilities, neural and behavioral psychology, and developmental aspects of cognition.

The main fields of study for Jaeggi include:

  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Within these broader fields, their subfields of specialization are:

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Jaeggi's work covers a range of specific topics, notably:

  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Cognitive Science and Mapping
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Early Childhood Education and Development

The scientist has contributed articles to several frequent publication venues, among them:

  • Journal of Cognitive Enhancement
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Communications Biology
  • Brain Stimulation
  • Nature Human Behaviour

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Jaeggi include:

  • "Quantifying the Difference Between Active and Passive Control Groups in Cognitive Interventions Using Two Meta-analytical Approaches" (2020), Journal of Cognitive Enhancement
  • "Action video game play facilitates 'learning to learn'" (2021), Communications Biology
  • "The benefits of simultaneous tDCS and working memory training on transfer outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis" (2022), Brain Stimulation
  • "Activity Engagement and Cognitive Performance Amongst Older Adults" (2021), Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Neural correlates of working memory training: Evidence for plasticity in older adults" (2020), NeuroImage

Frequent coauthors working alongside Jaeggi include:

  • Aaron R. Seitz
  • Martin Buschkuehl
  • Anja Pahor
  • John Jonides
  • Jacky Au

Best Publications

  • Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory

    Susanne M. Jaeggi;Martin Buschkuehl;John Jonides;Walter J. Perrig

  • The concurrent validity of the N-back task as a working memory measure

    Susanne M Jaeggi;Martin Buschkuehl;Walter J Perrig;Beat Meier

  • Short- and long-term benefits of cognitive training

    Susanne M. Jaeggi;Martin Buschkuehl;John Jonides;Priti Shah

  • Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis

    Jacky Au;Ellen Sheehan;Nancy Tsai;Greg J. Duncan

  • The Relationship between N-Back Performance and Matrix Reasoning--Implications for Training and Transfer.

    Susanne M. Jaeggi;Barbara Studer-Luethi;Barbara Studer-Luethi;Martin Buschkuehl;Yi-Fen Su

  • Improving intelligence: a literature review.

    Martin Buschkuehl;Susanne M. Jaeggi

  • The role of individual differences in cognitive training and transfer

    Susanne M. Jaeggi;Martin Buschkuehl;Priti Shah;John Jonides

  • Working memory training improves reading processes in typically developing children

    Sandra V. Loosli;Martin Buschkuehl;Walter J. Perrig;Susanne M. Jaeggi

  • Impact of working memory training on memory performance in old-old adults.

    Martin Buschkuehl;Susanne M. Jaeggi;Sara Hutchison;Pasqualina Perrig-Chiello

  • The everyday emotional experience of adults with major depressive disorder: Examining emotional instability, inertia, and reactivity.

    Renee J. Thompson;Jutta Mata;Susanne M. Jaeggi;Martin Buschkuehl

  • Maladaptive coping, adaptive coping, and depressive symptoms: Variations across age and depressive state

    Renee J. Thompson;Jutta Mata;Susanne M. Jaeggi;Martin Buschkuehl

  • Does excessive memory load attenuate activation in the prefrontal cortex? Load-dependent processing in single and dual tasks: functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

    Susanne M Jaeggi;Ria Seewer;Arto C Nirkko;Doris Eckstein

  • Resting state cortico-cerebellar functional connectivity networks: a comparison of anatomical and self-organizing map approaches.

    Jessica A. Bernard;Rachael D. Seidler;Kelsey M. Hassevoort;Bryan L. Benson

  • Emotion-Network Density in Major Depressive Disorder

    Madeline Lee Pe;Katharina Kircanski;Renee J. Thompson;Laura F. Bringmann

  • Neuronal effects following working memory training.

    Martin Buschkuehl;Susanne M. Jaeggi;John Jonides

  • Feeling Blue or Turquoise? Emotional Differentiation in Major Depressive Disorder

    Emre Demiralp;Renee J. Thompson;Jutta Mata;Susanne M. Jaeggi

  • Walk on the bright side: Physical activity and affect in major depressive disorder.

    Jutta Mata;Renee J. Thompson;Susanne M. Jaeggi;Martin Buschkuehl

  • Improving Methodological Standards in Behavioral Interventions for Cognitive Enhancement

    C. Shawn Green;Daphne Bavelier;Arthur F. Kramer;Arthur F. Kramer;Sophia Vinogradov

  • On how high performers keep cool brains in situations of cognitive overload

    Susanne M. Jaeggi;Martin Buschkuehl;Alex Etienne;Christoph Ozdoba

  • Tuning the mind: Exploring the connections between musical ability and executive functions.

    L. Robert Slevc;Nicholas S. Davey;Martin Buschkuehl;Susanne M. Jaeggi

  • Improving Fluid Intelligence With Training on Working Memory: A Meta-Analysis: (524912015-029)

    Jacky Au;Ellen Sheehan;Nancy Tsai;Greg J. Duncan

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Buschkuehl
Martin Buschkuehl University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
John Jonides
John Jonides University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Priti Shah
Priti Shah University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Walter J. Perrig
Walter J. Perrig University of Bern
Scott Peltier
Scott Peltier University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ian H. Gotlib
Ian H. Gotlib Stanford University
Renee J. Thompson
Renee J. Thompson Washington University in St. Louis
Aaron R. Seitz
Aaron R. Seitz University of California, Riverside
Jutta Mata
Jutta Mata University of Mannheim
Jessica A. Bernard
Jessica A. Bernard Texas A&M University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology now offers more flexibility than ever, with a growing number of online degree options available throughout the USA. Many students are looking for affordable paths to a psychology degree, making cost and value vital considerations.

Regional affordability can dramatically shape your decision-making. For instance, those searching for affordable psychology degrees in Boston will find options tailored to urban students who may need evening or hybrid classes. Similarly, affordable psychology degrees in California offer access to programs in a range of community colleges and universities, both public and private.

If you are located in the Southeast, affordable psychology degrees in Florida are plentiful and typically support online learners balancing work or family roles. Prospective students in Texas may want to explore the cheapest psychology programs in Houston for strong job prospects and practical program design.

With many programs now available online, psychology students can tailor their educational experience to meet individual learning styles and career goals. When choosing a pathway, consider factors like tuition, available concentrations, and local career opportunities to help shape your future in this dynamic field.

Best Scientists Citing Susanne M. Jaeggi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles